Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/bw claim form - old SimplyBe JDW CAT 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


blacksofa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:thumb: Not all claims require a Skelly

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

All posted, special signed for delivery by 1.00 pm tomorrow. Next stop Skeleton Argument bullet points. Probably going to have the evening off!

 

Edited: Sorry Andy I posted the above before I saw your post.

 

 

I thought a Skeleton Argument was sort of my notes on the WS

- bullet points - to remind me of my main arguments?

 

 

At the moment I feel like I have read through that WS so many times that I'll be able to recite it

- but that will probably change in front of a judge!

 

 

What do you mean that not all claims require one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably going to have the evening off!

 

Can I also :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you definitely deserve it Andy. I edited my earlier post but probaby too late for you to see it.

 

What do you mean that not all claims require a skeleton argument?

 

Was mulling it all over on the way to the Post Office

 

 

- my main legal arguments are (?)

Hearsay on their part,

Statute Barred,

No Default Notice,

lack of compliance with CCA/CPR requests (back up of suspect documentation)?

 

 

If the judge decides to go down the 'probabilities' route

then the probability is that with their hearsay documentation,

reconstituted agreement, terms, letters and very generic list of transactions, and a claim of a default notice which appears to not exist, that debt (if it exists) could belong to almost anyone.

 

 

Also there is a probability that,

realising the imminence of statute barred for this alleged debt,

they decided to have a last ditch effort to pursue the debt,

and recoup far more than they paid for it when they purchased it,

even though they were outside the statute barred timescale.

 

 

Am I on the right lines here, or is that too inflammatory?

 

Which reminds me...

I keep forgetting to say this,

but the debt has dropped off my noddle account at the latest monthly snapshot yesterday.

Wish I had remembered to say that earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

of no importance

just means the default reached its 6th birthday

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been so focussed on the WS that I just realised I don't really know much about the potential outcomes of all of this!

 

from what I can gather, the possible outcomes:

 

Discontinued by Lowell/BW before the date

 

On the day:

If they don’t turn up – dismissed/struck out (is there a difference) or ruled in my favour?

 

If they do turn up: dismissed/struck out; ruled in their favour; ruled in my favour

 

If dismissed/struck out/discontinued or in my favour, can I claim costs and if so do I have to prep this in advance?

 

Don’t want to spend time on it in advance unless I have to

, or if there is a real advantage,

 

as if I lose

, I will feel that I have given them even more!

 

I have had a look at a few threads re costs, but they mainly seem to be quite old.

 

There are references to special court forms for this,

but also some people seem to favour simply an itemised statement/list to take to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its small claims costs are fixed already in their POC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been so focussed on the WS that I just realised I don't really know much about the potential outcomes of all of this!

 

from what I can gather, the possible outcomes:

 

Discontinued by Lowell/BW before the date Unlikely given that they have prepared and served their WS

 

On the day:

If they don’t turn up – dismissed/struck out (is there a difference) One and the same or ruled in my favour? Hope so

If they do turn up: dismissed/struck out; ruled in their favour; ruled in my favour Correct

 

If dismissed/struck out/discontinued or in my favour, can I claim costs and if so do I have to prep this in advance? You have to ask the Judge best to have a rough figure ready

 

Don’t want to spend time on it in advance unless I have to

, or if there is a real advantage,

 

as if I lose

, I will feel that I have given them even more!

 

I have had a look at a few threads re costs, but they mainly seem to be quite old.

 

There are references to special court forms for this, Thats for Fast Track..your in Small Claims track

but also some people seem to favour simply an itemised statement/list to take to court.

Correct

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies DX and Andy.

 

DX - are you saying that I can only claim the same figure as they have indicated in the costs section of their POC?

 

Edited... they have listed £50 legal representative fees. Is that the amount I can claim? I think I'll be over that with stationery, postage, and travel/parking expenses alone, or can I not claim them?

blacksofa

Edited by blacksofa
Added some numbers!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies DX and Andy.

 

DX - are you saying that I can only claim the same figure as they have indicated in the costs section of their POC?

 

blacksofa

 

No...thats the fixed fees for the claimant costs for issuing the claim......if they win they can ask for further costs.....which is at the discretion of the Judge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No...thats the fixed fees for the claimant costs for issuing the claim......if they win they can ask for further costs.....which is at the discretion of the Judge.

 

So I can claim postage and stationery costs then (with receipts) and mileage? and car parking?

 

What about this hourly fee for LIPs that I have read about (£18 or £19), Can I also claim under that? I don't think I could put on a claim for the actual number of hours I have spent on it, as that comes into £100s.

 

I have read that the max that can be granted by the judge is 2/3 of that which would be payable to a solicitor dealing with the case for you.

 

Any ideas on what a realistic figure would be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And also £90 for a days work if you have to take a day off....have a rough tot up and you give me a figure your thinking of ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And also £90 for a days work if you have to take a day off....have a rough tot up and you give me a figure your thinking of ?

 

OK Andy, will do, either later tonight or over the next few days (back to work tomorrow). I have read somewhere mileage = 40p per mile - is that still correct?

 

Not sure about the day off work issue - I have booked it as annual leave, so don't know if I can claim for that - bit miffed I have had to lose a day's leave though. (£90 a day would be nice, but I'm in the sticks and working in Adult Health and Social Care, so £60 is more like it!)

 

Blacksofa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes as far as Im aware...40p per mile

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So... came home from a long early shift at work, planning to spend the afternoon/evening writing out my skeleton argument and my expenses, to find a Notice of Discontinuance from BW.

 

 

Have rung the court and they have received their copy,

the case has been removed from the hearings list on Friday

and moved to the 'Dead Zone' which made me snigger.

 

Enormous thanks to DX and Andy for your help.

There is no way I could have achieved this without it.

Pay day on Thursday and although it won't be huge,

I will be making a donation.

 

Drinking coffee and eating doughnuts whilst humming 'Fanfare for the Common Man'!

 

Blacksofa

Link to post
Share on other sites

no Lucky Man...know the album well

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Black....I guess the Witness statement was worthwhile.

 

Thread title amended to reflect the result........delighted for you.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...