Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Breach of contract and disability discrimination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I started a new teaching post in September 2016.

 

Before I started I was open and honest about my ADDISONS DISEASE and thyroid - hashimotos . Both are autoimmune endocrine chronic illnesses that can flare up. The Addisons is effected significantly by emotional stress and exhaustion.

 

I hadn't to that point had to take time off work with either other than to visit consultants .

However , in November 2016 I was taken by ambulance to hospital from school having my first crisis. This led to two weeks 'sick leave' during which I requested some adjustments to support me at work .

It should be noted that I have taught for over 20 years and never in a school as hard as this one.

 

When I came back, my TA was allowed to stay in class all day which made a big difference to me and my exhaustion levels .

 

After Christmas this was removed , my planning day was changed but anyone can have their planning day changed . I then became progressively ill, I had spoken to my head teacher and highlighted how I was feeling , this was ignored . I ended up in hospital for four days following another crisis.

 

I was then emailed and told I couldn't return to work until I had seen occupational health but was not placed on medical leave . So my GP has had to sign me off sick . I saw OH yesterday and they were very supportive however I am not well enough to return particularly without adjustments .

 

Today I received a letter informing me that I was no on half pay as I had had 25 days off sick. Those 25 days are directly related to my addisons which is covered under the 2010 equalities act and wouldn't have happened had they put in place reasonable adjustments .

 

My contract states that all sick leave is aggragated and includes previous employment with other schools. So I should have 100 days at full pay and 100 days at half pay, not that I want to use them.

 

I have asked my union for support but I don't know if I should do anything else.

My contract is quite clear and I am bring really messed around now which nearly pushed me into crisis again .

 

So, if you have got this far :

Should I go legal straight away?

Should I push the union next week ?

Do I have a discrimination claim? I know it's constructive dismissal but I haven't been with this employer long enough . Any help or advice would be great , thank you

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is sick pay discretionary? If not, then yes - just send a letter asking for the pay

 

It sounds like you may be fundamentally unable to do the job - what do you think?

 

Ultimateley a court , not you or the employer, decides if an adjustment is "reasonable" but it sounds like in effect you will always need a second person present?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sick pay is not discretionary so the union should be able to sort it out on Monday .

 

I realise that this school is really a dead end for me as the stress level is too high. So I am thinking of changing careers.

 

Occupational health said they can recommend but school do not have to comply .

In reality I have accepted this is not for me and we have to part company , I am just so angry at the deduction in wages which is wrong. Thank you for replying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully the pay is simple - sounds like it. That will buy you some time to work out "what next", which is always a tough question when you are at your best, never mind unwell.

 

Have you liked other schools? Would cover work, where you just do the available days you are well, suit better?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been happy in previous schools but my body has let me down . Gives the wrong impression .

 

I did supply for two terms last year , in the same school , loved it and managed the behaviour as they weren't too bad. They sadly offered me a job after I had accepted another which wasn't the best idea really .

 

But that is an option .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever you do don't resign. It is possible you might leave teaching with a disabilty pension which would be a much better bet. This needs to be negotiated while you are still employed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to read the pension scheme's ill health retirement rules. A lot of pension schemes changed the wording about what is considered a permanent disability and what level it must be to get a pension. It would have said about not being able to fulfil your duties in your present role but most schemes changed that to being unfit to do ANY work so look at it carefully and if it is about your current job then consider applying for early retirement.

 

You should ask your doctor to organise a brain scan, you may well have problems with the Hypothalamus Pituitary axis and with either thickening of the wall of the hypothalamus, causing it to fail to secrete key chemicals or possibly an adenoma on the pituitary gland causing overproduction of prolactin and proteins called leucokines and cytokines (plus others) which control the immune response and other glands and major organs. The raised prolactin may also cause your mental problems. You can get medication to reduce the prolactin levels but not adjust the protein levels as the drugs that would work can also kill you as they suppress the immune system and are normally given to patients with cancers such as Hodgkins lymphoma. However, they have been trialled for MS sufferers and apart from the dead people show promising results. If you live near London you should get yourself referred to Dr Amolak Bansal at Epsom-St Helier Hospital

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to read the pension scheme's ill health retirement rules. A lot of pension schemes changed the wording about what is considered a permanent disability and what level it must be to get a pension. It would have said about not being able to fulfil your duties in your present role but most schemes changed that to being unfit to do ANY work so look at it carefully and if it is about your current job then consider applying for early retirement.

 

You should ask your doctor to organise a brain scan, you may well have problems with the Hypothalamus Pituitary axis and with either thickening of the wall of the hypothalamus, causing it to fail to secrete key chemicals or possibly an adenoma on the pituitary gland causing overproduction of prolactin and proteins called leucokines and cytokines (plus others) which control the immune response and other glands and major organs. The raised prolactin may also cause your mental problems. You can get medication to reduce the prolactin levels but not adjust the protein levels as the drugs that would work can also kill you as they suppress the immune system and are normally given to patients with cancers such as Hodgkins lymphoma. However, they have been trialled for MS sufferers and apart from the dead people show promising results. If you live near London you should get yourself referred to Dr Amolak Bansal at Epsom-St Helier Hospital

Thank you . I have had MRI already. I am not fitting medically into a neat box.

I managed to get referred to UCLH to see a brilliant German ENDO. But I will make sure I have the name of doctor you have recommended saved too.

I will speak to my pension company although medical retirement at 46 is something I want to avoid unless it's a last resort.

My union rep has emailed me saying she doesn't have time to deal the issues, so now feeling rather more worried than before .

Link to post
Share on other sites

medical retirement is no bad thing in itself as long as the terms are right. You may be able to still work but in another role, depends on what the rules say. They certainly used to be that if you couldnt do your current role then you could take it but as said, most schemes changed that rule over the last 5 years. Mine did after I retired on ill-health grounds and the Pensions Ombudsman applied the new rules to my case even though I had left employment 2 years prior to it being considered so I lost a fortune in benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bansal is primarily a Rheumatologist, I have been a guinea pig for him and helped on a couple of papers as well. I threatened to join him on the speaking circuit jsu to get the free food. When waiting for my pension decision he asked me what I was living on as I had no income, I told him cannibalism. I put that on a benefits form as well, they didnt try and evaluate a notional income based on the equivalent cash value to one of your neighbours you had for lunch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello OP,

 

Have you been in touch with ACAS? They are a mandatory precursor to the legal route and in any event have on occasion resolved issues between employee/employer.

 

You are asking about what potential claims you have against your employer.

 

Disability discrimination.

 

You can argue that your employer is failing to make reasonable adjustments for your condition. Their defence could be that they do not have the resources available to offer you the reasonable adjustment that you seek. Do you think they would sound realistic if they used that defence?

 

Constructive dismissal does not require a minimum length of service. You are thinking about Unfair dismissal and that requires a minimum of 2 years service.

 

Constructive dismissal is to do with you feeling that your employer is forcing you out of your job. If things get to this stage before you resolve your dispute with the school, then you could raise a claim for constructive dismissal.

 

Though a breach of contract claim is what you would pursue if you wish to resolve your dispute whilst your employment is still ongoing.

 

Sorry to hear that your trade union have not been very involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go over your reps head to central branch; too busy is not acceptable

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

purplemushroomfairy, it might be useful to post this also on the TES teachers' forum as some posters there are very knowledgeable about teachers' contract of employment conditions and about disability discrimination and reasonable adjustments in schools specifically

 

https://community.tes.com/forums/workplace-dilemmas.96/

 

I recall from somewhere that if sickness absence is directly caused by a disability an employer, as a "reasonable adjustment", ought to disregard it in relation to the absence triggers in their sickness absence policy. Not sure if it should be disregarded for purposes of maximum sickness pay in the Burgundy Book though - probably not.

 

Union's response is completely unacceptable. You pay your subscription for their help at times like this. They aren't doing you a favour by supporting you, you are entitled to their support. The complexity of your case is certainly beyond any school rep's ability to deal with it, probably beyond even the regional office. But somewhere in your union's head office there will be someone with the expertise. Complain to head office and get the right person involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have home insurance check if you have the legal cover for employment matters.

 

Going to another solicitor would invalidate all union entitlement to representation. The previous answer was correct - if the union rep is not doing their job properly, escalate the issue. You only go outside the union if you have decided there is no going back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to another solicitor would invalidate all union entitlement to representation. The previous answer was correct - if the union rep is not doing their job properly, escalate the issue. You only go outside the union if you have decided there is no going back.

 

Yes definitely escalate the matter to the regional secretary. However, my advice remains the same people should check if their home insurance policy covers them for employment matters and if the union doesn't take on the case they can go to the insurer.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

As already suggested, get the union FullTime Officer for your area involved. Phone Head Office if the branch wont get in touch on your behalf.

 

Dont forget, most union reps at local level are lay reps and have a very differing range of experiances so they often need help from above to be able to offer you help. This direct contact will speed things up but dotn forget to inform your reps to keep them on side.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...