Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing Benefit Overpayment Date In Court


NikkiJSon1986
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Sorry if I have posted this incorrectly,

 

I'm at my wits end and so worried dont know what to do,

 

I was claiming housing benefit, and then my partner moved in, at this time we were both working part time. I re-applied for a joint claim, Apr 2013 and gave wageslips and bank statements and so on to which I was advised I would still be entitled to Housing Benefit.

 

In June my partner increased his hours from 20 to 37 and I went on my councils website in May to advise that there had been a change in circumstances and also that my rent had increased. A few weeks later I received a letter advising that I was not entitled to the full amount and was only entitled to around £28 a week. (I was under the impression that they had received my change in circumstances and acted upon it). Stupidly I didn't even check the amount in the paperwork as I just thought that we were still entitled to it as I was still part time and his wage hadn't increased by a large amount.

 

In Sept 2015 I was advised that I wasnt entitled to housing benefit anymore and then in In February 2016 I was interviewed under caution and advised that I had not advised them that my partners wage had increased and that it was going to be investigated.

 

I then received a letter advising that I had been overpaid by £5600, I was mortified and advised that I wanted to pay it back asap.

 

I sent in an appeal as my circumstances at the time were not good, i received nothing back from them to advise they had even acknowledged my appeal, then when i spoke to them the other day they advised that they had closed my appeal down and just withdrawn it by £100

 

I re-applied when i was on maternity allowance, they advised i was entitled to around £10 a week of which they would claim that back towards my debt, then when i went back to work they advised me i wasnt entitled so I set up a payment plan of £30 a month.

 

Now I have received a letter saying i need to go to court i am at my wits end. From the free legal advice that I have received they are saying if i plead guilty I will get a criminal record and fine but if i plead not guilty then it could be drawn out longer and court costs could go up more and i could be looking at prison.

 

I have never done anything wrong in my life i'm so worried im going to leave my children.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much to be honest, as I dont think that we would be entitled to legal aid, spoke to a local solicitor who advised that fixed costs would be around £400 and just to basically speak to the on duty solicitor when i get there.

 

On the letter from court it states that I failed to advise that my partners hours had increased and was being done under section 111a

 

Im so worried about leaving my children and being in the local paper, i would be mortified if i was classed as a benefit cheat and got a criminal record, I would probably even lose my job :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charge magistrates court 1720

 

between june 2013-aug 2015 you dishonestly failed to promptly notify the council in a prescribed manner of a change of circumstances. which you knew would affect your entitlement to housing benefit namely you partner received an increased income. Contrary to section 111a (1a) and (3) of the social security administration act 1992 (ss92039) :(

 

I know I owe the overpayment back but i really dont think that i did it fraudulently, but i dont want to plead guilty as i dont think that i am but i really dont want a criminal record or it have to go to a trial.

 

Cant stop thinking about it im so worried feel sick, started having chest pains as well with it all

Edited by NikkiJSon1986
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would stop worrying about prison. For a first offence (if convicted) you are likely to receive a fine.

 

My gut reaction to the statement in your first post is that this 'could' be an administrative error by the council. If you have left anything out, say so but it appears to me that you contacted the council on every change of circumstances. The problem is proving it.

 

What I would do is contact the solicitor informing them that I will be denying the charge and that they provide all evidence that they intend to rely on in court including all data that may undermine their case.

At the same time, I would contact the council and state that as this matter is now pending legal action, you require them to disclose all communications that you have had with them via letter, email and telephone logs.

Get a hold of your phone bills and highlight where you have phoned the council.

 

Do you have a date to attend court yet?

 

While pleading not guilty will increase the costs, even if found guilty, you can apply to pay in instalments and the court will take your financial circumstances into account.

 

While ignorance is no excuse, it does seem to me that you have updated the council when required.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank-you for your response Silverfox,

 

No nothing left out at all, only thing is I contacted the housing benefit the other day to check what information they had received from myself about updating my details. They say that have nothing from when I registered my partner living at my address with me up until Sept 15. Although she did say to me that they had received regular updates form the tax credits, (which i informed as well), when I asked why didnt they update my details from the tax credits, she just said they dont always rely on that info.

 

They have nothing registered that I sent a change of circumstance in, because I actually did this through my councils website, I have no proof that I did this. And as I received a letter a few weeks after to advise that my claim had changed, I just assumed that this was because of the change that I reported.

 

Would it be the person from the housing benefit that I would inform that i would be denying the charge?

 

Yes my court date is the 14th March :(

Edited by NikkiJSon1986
Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no name of a solicitor on the summons then if you have a name on the summons, write to them. If there is no named person then I would assume the Legal Deparment. If you can, deliver he letter by hand ang get a receipt.

Nothing will be decided on the first hearing as it is likely to be adjourned to a later date for you to get your defence filed. The Only defence you have at the moment is your statement that you did inform the council via its website. Did you not get an acknowledgement email from them?

 

I would be asking the council to withdraw the summons. It can be done. I have done so and then begin the complaints progress. I have to say that it has been a few years (at least 9) since I last had contact with my council so procedures may have changed since then. You don't have a lot of time so I would suggest you get onto this ASAP.

 

There is nothing stopping the council doing another review of the account but the summons needs to be withdrawn first. Apart from moral support, there is not much we can do this end.

 

One thing I would mention if it comes to court. The fact that you have acknowledged there was an overpayment and you had agreed to pay this back in instalments so why the need to take court action. This case isn't about the overpayment but the councils assertions that this was a deliberate act to defraud them. This is what you have to defend. Prior notices of changes should be brought up as well. Why tell the council about changes at all if it was your intention to defraud?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank-you Silverfox,

 

Yes I did receive an acknowledgement when I submitted the change of circumstances, but stupidly I didn't save it because i just thought that as they had my new details they would just amend them accordingly. And then I received a letter from them a few weeks later advising that it had decreased, from this I thought they had acted on the information that I had provided.

 

I am going to contact the housing benefit tomorrow, what do you think would be best to say to them to try and get this stopped from going to court?

 

Also going to draft a letter, as there is a name of a person that the charge has been authorised by, is that who I would write directly to?. (Specialist Fraud Division Crown Prosecution Division)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, write to them.

 

As for the acknowledgement, that should be in their system somewhere and your email address. A simple check on their systems should reveal something.

 

When contacting the benefits section, stress that you did submit a change of circumstances via email. Stick to facts with one exception. I would think that the interview under caution was a stressful time and may have given them the impression you were trying to hide something. This was not the case. As you had previously notified them of a change AND after, why would you suddenly not do this one.

 

If this doesn't raise concerns with them I don't know what will. As this is going to be a long letter, stick to the points in brief on the first page and expand further into the letter.

 

See if you can find a local solicitor that does a free half hour and get an opinion. Also see if there is a Community Legal Service available in your area.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can always send in a Subject Acess Request (SAR) it costs £10. It would be best to hand it in and get a receipt for it. You can use the document scanning desk that most Councils have at reception.

 

The request can take up to 40 days to fulfil. If your case is before you get the bundle then ask for an adjournment as the information may help your defence.

 

A prison sentence is possible and often this is suspended. There are many cases listed in a site that many regular posters know about. See here >> (lacef) one such story from there is below.

 

http://www.waverley.gov.uk/news/article/194/suspended_sentence_for_benefit_cheat

 

Also there are new sentencing guidelines comin out soon. Also you may want to have a read here as well >> https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/overview

 

Please don't think I am judging you I am not. I am just informing you what the possible outcomes COULD be.

 

Secondly if caught a second time you can be sanctioned for a significant period of time.

 

You may also ask to speak to the duty Solicitor on duty in Court the day of your hearing. Please do so as soon as you arrive. Then make sure you inform the Prosecution you are represented.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...