Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and Brexit Britain err EU Greece becomes first European country to ban bottom trawling in marine parks   Greece becomes first European country to ban bottom trawling in marine parks | Fishing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM The law will come into force in national parks within two years and in all of the country’s marine protected areas by 2030  
    • Good on them for following the rules. They still haven't proven that I'm the driver though right? I also checked the council's website and there's no planning permission for the signs. No luck with the organ grinder. I think I'll need to take this to court and win to prove my point to the other freeholders.
    • Isas already allow you to earn tax-free interest on up to £20,000 each tax year. But under recent reforms, they are now supposed to be more flexible.View the full article
    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell Claimform - Old shop direct CAT Debt***Claim Dismissed***


dave466
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2366 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning.

 

This morning my wife has received a claim form from the county court business centre.

 

I have been reading up and would thus be the correct process to challenge the debt?

 

 

The POC is as follows-

 

The defendant entered into a consumer credit act 1974 agreement with shop direct under account reference Xxxxxxxx (the agreement)

 

The defendent failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 01/07/2011 and notice given to the defendant.

 

Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2827.72 remains due and outstanding.

 

 

And the claiment claims

 

the said sum of £2827.72.

 

interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.620, but limited to one year, being £226.22.

 

Costs

 

So therefore if i send a CPR 31.14 to lowell solicitors limited which is on the claim form this would be requesting them to send me all the documents that relate to the agreement that they are claiming for??

 

And also will need to complete and acknowledge of service online?

 

Regards, dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi dave I have moved your thread to the Financial Legal Issues in view of the claim form received,

 

Please read the following link which will explain the process and what you need to do.

 

Copy and paste the Qs and your responses back here so we have all the relevant history of the debt and answers in one post.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate

 

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell portfolio Ltd

 

Date of issue – 22 Feb 2017

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1.The defendant entered into a consumer crediticon act 1974 agreement with shop direct under account reference Xxxxxxxx (the agreement)

 

2.The defendent failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

3.The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 01/07/2011 and notice given to the defendant.

 

4.Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2827 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the claiment claims

 

the said sum of £2827

 

interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.620, but limited to one year, being £226.22.

 

Costs

 

What is the value of the claim?

Amount claimed 3053

Court fee 185

Legal costs 80

Total amount 3318

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? The claim is from a catalogue (shop direct group)

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Not 100% sure but either 2007/8

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to debt purchaser lowell.

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I believe she did

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I believe she did.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not too sure.

 

Why did you cease payments? I think it was about January 2011 but again not 100% sure

 

What was the date of your last payment? Possibly January 2011

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? I don't believe so no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" So therefore if i send a CPR 31.14 to lowell solicitors limited which is on the claim form this would be requesting them to send me all the documents that relate to the agreement that they are claiming for?? "

 

Correct and also a CCA section 78 request

 

" And also will need to complete and acknowledge of service online? " Correct

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just signed her up to noddle. Date of default was 28/06/2011

 

" So therefore if i send a CPR 31.14 to lowell solicitors limited which is on the claim form this would be requesting them to send me all the documents that relate to the agreement that they are claiming for?? "

 

Correct and also a CCA section 78 request

 

" And also will need to complete and acknowledge of service online? " Correct

 

Andy

 

Cheers Andy.

 

Just noticed this on her credit report but we know nothing about this.

It's under the ccj and showing as ACTIVE

 

Name Xxxxxxxxx

Address xxxxxxxxxxx

Judgment date 28/05/2012

Amount £ 690

Court name Northampton Ccbc

Link to post
Share on other sites

so vanishes may next year.

 

 

theres no harm in ringing SD and asking last payment date.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just realised too that the claim form is in her maiden name, does this make any difference? No

 

And also do I send the cpr to the address for sending documents? Yes and the CCA

 

Regards.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

 

Thanks for quick replies Andy, much appreciated.

 

Both letters are now written up and printed ready to be posted.

 

Would it be best to send them both separate and recorded or in one envelope recorded along with the £1 postal order for the ccj request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its recorded...yes thats fine

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its recorded...yes thats fine

 

Just a quick update. Relevant forms got posted recorded and I've checked the tracking and it states they were delivered and signed for yesterday, 27/02/17.

 

We have also been online and done the AOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

now don't forget to go ring SD and ask last payment date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so vanishes may next year.

 

 

theres no harm in ringing SD and asking last payment date.

 

Sorry must have missed your message the other day.

But there is no details as to what the ccj is for or for whom.

 

And I assume your saying ring shop direct to see when last payment was?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont hurt. to ring SD in case it might be closer to SB if the Default was registered late?

 

 

as for the other CCJ - you have the CCJ number

go ring northants bulk and ask for a copy of it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

My wife today received the following letters from lowell.

 

Not sure if i have attached them ok.

 

One states that the account was actually opened 22nd November 2005, also states that i asked for cca 24th feb 2014 (typo?).

 

Another states that they got legally assigned the account on 11th January 2011

(therefore is this now statute barred as she had not made any payments or arrangements to pay any of this?)

20170302_175549.pdf

20170302_174857.pdf

20170302_174635.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of assignment then

Won't go anywhere without a signed agreement

But whatever happens don't miss your def date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go back and read that link in post 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great work well done!!

 

 

so when was her last payment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dave keep the 2 copies of the notice of assignments safe with varying dates that they think they bought the debt...but not really sure...this will prove excellent disclosure for your defence. :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for late reply. Her last payment was 11th November 2010.

 

dave keep the 2 copies of the notice of assignments safe with varying dates that they think they bought the debt...but not really sure...this will prove excellent disclosure for your defence. :wink:

 

Yeah I've kept everything together cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for late reply. Her last payment was 11th November 2010.

 

Then its statute barred

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...