Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell Claimform - Old shop direct CAT Debt***Claim Dismissed***


dave466
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning.

 

This morning my wife has received a claim form from the county court business centre.

 

I have been reading up and would thus be the correct process to challenge the debt?

 

 

The POC is as follows-

 

The defendant entered into a consumer credit act 1974 agreement with shop direct under account reference Xxxxxxxx (the agreement)

 

The defendent failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 01/07/2011 and notice given to the defendant.

 

Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2827.72 remains due and outstanding.

 

 

And the claiment claims

 

the said sum of £2827.72.

 

interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.620, but limited to one year, being £226.22.

 

Costs

 

So therefore if i send a CPR 31.14 to lowell solicitors limited which is on the claim form this would be requesting them to send me all the documents that relate to the agreement that they are claiming for??

 

And also will need to complete and acknowledge of service online?

 

Regards, dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi dave I have moved your thread to the Financial Legal Issues in view of the claim form received,

 

Please read the following link which will explain the process and what you need to do.

 

Copy and paste the Qs and your responses back here so we have all the relevant history of the debt and answers in one post.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate

 

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell portfolio Ltd

 

Date of issue – 22 Feb 2017

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1.The defendant entered into a consumer crediticon act 1974 agreement with shop direct under account reference Xxxxxxxx (the agreement)

 

2.The defendent failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

3.The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 01/07/2011 and notice given to the defendant.

 

4.Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2827 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the claiment claims

 

the said sum of £2827

 

interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.620, but limited to one year, being £226.22.

 

Costs

 

What is the value of the claim?

Amount claimed 3053

Court fee 185

Legal costs 80

Total amount 3318

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? The claim is from a catalogue (shop direct group)

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Not 100% sure but either 2007/8

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to debt purchaser lowell.

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I believe she did

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I believe she did.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not too sure.

 

Why did you cease payments? I think it was about January 2011 but again not 100% sure

 

What was the date of your last payment? Possibly January 2011

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? I don't believe so no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" So therefore if i send a CPR 31.14 to lowell solicitors limited which is on the claim form this would be requesting them to send me all the documents that relate to the agreement that they are claiming for?? "

 

Correct and also a CCA section 78 request

 

" And also will need to complete and acknowledge of service online? " Correct

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just signed her up to noddle. Date of default was 28/06/2011

 

" So therefore if i send a CPR 31.14 to lowell solicitors limited which is on the claim form this would be requesting them to send me all the documents that relate to the agreement that they are claiming for?? "

 

Correct and also a CCA section 78 request

 

" And also will need to complete and acknowledge of service online? " Correct

 

Andy

 

Cheers Andy.

 

Just noticed this on her credit report but we know nothing about this.

It's under the ccj and showing as ACTIVE

 

Name Xxxxxxxxx

Address xxxxxxxxxxx

Judgment date 28/05/2012

Amount £ 690

Court name Northampton Ccbc

Link to post
Share on other sites

so vanishes may next year.

 

 

theres no harm in ringing SD and asking last payment date.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just realised too that the claim form is in her maiden name, does this make any difference? No

 

And also do I send the cpr to the address for sending documents? Yes and the CCA

 

Regards.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

 

Thanks for quick replies Andy, much appreciated.

 

Both letters are now written up and printed ready to be posted.

 

Would it be best to send them both separate and recorded or in one envelope recorded along with the £1 postal order for the ccj request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its recorded...yes thats fine

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its recorded...yes thats fine

 

Just a quick update. Relevant forms got posted recorded and I've checked the tracking and it states they were delivered and signed for yesterday, 27/02/17.

 

We have also been online and done the AOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

now don't forget to go ring SD and ask last payment date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so vanishes may next year.

 

 

theres no harm in ringing SD and asking last payment date.

 

Sorry must have missed your message the other day.

But there is no details as to what the ccj is for or for whom.

 

And I assume your saying ring shop direct to see when last payment was?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont hurt. to ring SD in case it might be closer to SB if the Default was registered late?

 

 

as for the other CCJ - you have the CCJ number

go ring northants bulk and ask for a copy of it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

My wife today received the following letters from lowell.

 

Not sure if i have attached them ok.

 

One states that the account was actually opened 22nd November 2005, also states that i asked for cca 24th feb 2014 (typo?).

 

Another states that they got legally assigned the account on 11th January 2011

(therefore is this now statute barred as she had not made any payments or arrangements to pay any of this?)

20170302_175549.pdf

20170302_174857.pdf

20170302_174635.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of assignment then

Won't go anywhere without a signed agreement

But whatever happens don't miss your def date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go back and read that link in post 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great work well done!!

 

 

so when was her last payment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dave keep the 2 copies of the notice of assignments safe with varying dates that they think they bought the debt...but not really sure...this will prove excellent disclosure for your defence. :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for late reply. Her last payment was 11th November 2010.

 

dave keep the 2 copies of the notice of assignments safe with varying dates that they think they bought the debt...but not really sure...this will prove excellent disclosure for your defence. :wink:

 

Yeah I've kept everything together cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for late reply. Her last payment was 11th November 2010.

 

Then its statute barred

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...