Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/Lowell sols claimform - old cap1 card 'debt'***Claim Dismissed***


fletch70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am trying to find out a couple of things about capital One

 

It seems at some point they had an address in Euston Rd London that then changed to Nottingham , does anyone know when this was?

 

There are many different sets of terms and conditions, I was also wondering what set were used in 2007/2008 . It seems that V14 were used in 2010 , again looking at what has been uploaded across different forums there seems to be a lot of variation

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

popped you into the cap1 forum.

 

 

I believe #v8 there are lots of threads here too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems at some point they had an address in Euston Rd London that then changed to Nottingham , does anyone know when this was?

 

Capital One filed the change of address to Nottingham at Companies house on 19 November 2010.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stigman, makes interesting reading then as it suggests a cut and paste job. My agreement dated 2005 clearly says between me and Cap 1 in Nottm

 

I asked because i have seen others from around that date that mention London as the address

 

 

 

Thanks Dx

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been looking through the threads on here and other places and there seem very few like mine.

Acc opened Dec 2005 and started missing payments Dec 2006 , went into a DMP Jan 2007

 

There seems to have been a very long wait between going into the DMP and termination

as Cap 1 claim it to be defaulted with the CRA 15/10/2008 which is also the date they confirm a 'statement of default' was issued.

 

 

I don't have the DN ,

have asked the DMP company for it but they haven't come back to me .

 

 

I have DN's from other credit cards that defaulted in 2007

so I suspect they never issued a compliant DN but of course without it I can't prove it.

 

My reasons for getting on top of this is that I was sent a LBA and responded with a CCA request to Lowell

and a request for info from Lowell solicitors , I have had a notice that it is now on hold pending further instruction.

 

last payment was jan or Feb 2012 so a while to go yet

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx

 

I just need to find the dates that other versions were introduced , esp V14

 

I will have a search tomorrow, my PC is running so slowly at the moment

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

In early June I received a LBA from Lowell solicitors regarding a Cap 1 account.

 

I replied to the LBA asking for

1) The agreement

2) The NOA

3) The DN

4) A statement of account

 

I also sent a CCA request to Lowell

 

The letter to the solicitors was received and responded to saying they would refer to client

 

The CCA request was received, the cheque cashed but no response

 

Today I received two letters from the solicitors

1) Included a statement of account and supposedly the NOA although in fact it was a letter from lowell saying if i didnt respond they would pass it to the solicitors and the other was a letter of acting from the solicitors . It also said they were still waiting for the DN

 

2) The same statement of account and a letter saying there was no actual DN but they had enclosed a copy of the DN template - in fact they hadn't

 

Both letters have asked that i contact them although as you can see the language has changed from will issue to may issue a claim

 

The CCA request is still outstanding and was referred to as being outstanding

 

In my original letter I did say i would respond within 14 days from receipt of their letter

 

My question is

Do I respond telling them that they have not supplied the agreement , the DN, the NOA even though they claim to have sent the DN and NOA and that the S78 request is outstanding

 

OR

 

Do I just keep quiet and ignore them

 

Thanks

Anxiety has kicked in again today, so any help would be much appreciated.

Lowell_Solicitor_18082016 Edit.pdf

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typically the wisdom of recent times is never respond to a failed CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have failed to send the CCA, as DX says, ignore, don't tell them.

 

As for the letters they have sent you, which one is the NOA? Because all I can see is three missives that Lowlifes have printed?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have failed to send the CCA, as DX says, ignore, don't tell them.

 

As for the letters they have sent you, which one is the NOA? Because all I can see is three missives that Lowlifes have printed?

 

Apart from the statement , that is all they sent with that letter. They are either incompetent or pretending that they are NOA's.

 

In the other letter - which I can not upload because for some reason I can only have 997 Kb of storage - they sent another copy of the statement and claimed that sent a standard DN . There was no DN standard or otherwise.

 

I suppose these were the bits that I was wondering if I should query

i.e their failure to respond, to my response to their LBA

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If what they have sent you in response to your request is the above, then IMO that'll have the judges rolling in the aisles!

 

How these clowns are still able to practice is beyond me, definitely worthy of a complaint to the SRA, TS, and your local MP.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll have to pop back and delete some earlier uploads

 

if you scroll right up the top

and on the right you'll see user CP

click that

then scroll down

on the left you'll see

attachments

click that

 

scroll down again

youll see something like

Page 3 of 3

first-right.pngFirstprevious-right.png123 last[hit last on the right

 

that start ticking boxes to delete uploads

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

It is something that I tried to address a while ago with CitB and Andyorch

 

For some reason that can not be figured out, storage limit is only 996 KB . Even if I delete everything ( which I think I already had done) they was not enough space for the two documents

Edited by fletch70

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

well check it out and let us know.

prob a hangover from one of your 150+ clones days I suspect

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I can not even find the upload attachment- I did find one small attachment to remove.

 

Only 150 - I was told it was more

 

You can not call me anything but persistant - sadly at that time there were a couple of people I trusted who it turns out are as mad as boxes of frogs. Mind you , i was probably as mad as them in those days

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

there have been some issues

you should be able to attach now ok

 

 

no pm to siteteam is being investigated still I think

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that the advice was not to chase the CCA request which I didn't, however I did chase the responses from Lowell solicitors

 

If we remember they claimed to have sent me a statement of account, NOA and generic default notice and all they had sent me was a statement of account, they have now sent me a generic default notice that really couldn't be relied on , it does not satisfy the requirements of the CCA , or thats my thinking . They also say they are waiting for the NOA and the agreement which shows that they lied on the previous letter.

 

They are a bunch of clowns and if they think I am making an offer of payment without an agreement and NOA they have another think coming. In addition , should things get heavier i will be asking for the deed of assignment and while I know all the arguments they will use, letting them know I would be seeking sight of it should it go to court may just slow them down.

 

I now have some evidence that not only are they incompetent but also lie

 

I am in two minds as to what to do about this, I am reluctant to complain at the moment, although will be happy to Jan 31sr 2018 which is my SB date on nearly all my debts.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will laugh at you if you ask for the deed of assignment, simply because it is a confidential document between two corporations.

 

TBH, if you keep poking the nest, then they're going to retaliate, they think that they have you against the ropes and are scared, so they pull out all the stops now and send any document they can to pile on the pressure.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will laugh at you if you ask for the deed of assignment, simply because it is a confidential document between two corporations.

 

TBH, if you keep poking the nest, then they're going to retaliate, they think that they have you against the ropes and are scared, so they pull out all the stops now and send any document they can to pile on the pressure.

 

Indeed , I am now waiting for their next move. Until they provide a compliant agreement or send another LBA I will not be corresponding with them. The deed is indeed a sensitive document and I realise that only a judge can order its disclosure. What I want to find out is, can disclosure be ordered in the SCT as opposed to fast or multi track.

 

There may be lots of real reasons why they do not want me to see the deed because unless I have seen it I can not tell if they actually have the right to issue a claim against me. This is not FMOTL stuff, this is legal stuff. There is precedent to say that I should be shown the deed although that precedent does say that not relevant data can be redacted.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The deed is indeed a sensitive document and I realise that only a judge can order its disclosure. What I want to find out is, can disclosure be ordered in the SCT as opposed to fast or multi track.

There may be lots of real reasons why they do not want me to see the deed because unless I have seen it I can not tell if they actually have the right to issue a claim against me. This is not FMOTL stuff, this is legal stuff. There is precedent to say that I should be shown the deed although that precedent does say that not relevant data can be redacted.

 

I fully understand, and that is something I wouldn't be able to advise, as I have no personal experience of this ever happening.

 

Although I do know that most, if not all, requests for said document, are ridiculed, perhaps because of the FMOTL garbage that precedes it!?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...