Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have been repaying Payday UK at £50.00 per month,

took out i loan for £380.00 and so far repaid £250.00 leaving the sum of £130.00 to clear the loan of £380.00.

 

they state they want £405.00 now and had this email below from Debt Collection Company :

 

Dear Mr ,

 

 

Creditor: MEM Consumer Finance Ltd (Payday UK)

Reference: ************

 

We have been instructed by the above to collect your unpaid MEM Consumer Finance Ltd (Payday UK) account.

 

This is your last opportunity to prevent your credit rating being adversely affected.

 

To pay your account in full please visit www.equidebt.co.uk or alternatively call Equidebt Limited on 01789 472 182 between 8.00am and 8.00pm Mon - Thurs, 8.00am - 6.00pm Friday or 8.00am - 1.00pm on Saturday.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Equidebt Limited

WHEN LEAVING MESSAGES WE MAY REFER TO OURSELVES AS EQL

 

Lucky i looked in my spam file and this email was their, strange thing as i have emailed Payday UK regarding the outstanding and had no reply nor anything in writing, just this email. I have stated i willrepay the loan of £380.00 plus month fee and thats all, what next as the debt collector state they are adding fees on top of the outstanding, just a joke and buch of clowns. Trying to repay and just get no reply

 

Any Thoughs what to do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Payday uk are one of the worse!!! I set up a repayment plan for £50pm with the citizens advice and yep they took £635 on the first

Month instead of £50 and after 3 months no body still

Cares, the bank not do anything no one

Will so if I was u, let it go

To a crappy dca then pay them £5 a month or

Something

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

well Equidebt have emailed me relating to the payday uk loan.

They state i must not pay the lender only them

is this to get their fees .

 

I loaned 380.00 and repaid 250.00 so far

should i repay the 130.00 balance.

Or the full amount 405.00 plus ?????

 

Has anyone had dealings with equidebt or keep paying payday uk directly

Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience with these types of companies, is I continue to pay the lender direct (via standing order) - you do not need to pay eqiedebt directly. As you say, they will probably add fees. In terms of the debt, I would pay the £130 and dispute the rest of it. Let DCA know that you believe you do not owe anything to PDUK once the £130 has been paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just had a letter frpm Equidebt, staing they demand yep £225.00 ? ,

my only option is the repay in full or £11.25 by debit card followed by monthly payments.

 

Not falling for that one,

quote them card number and just like magic they empty the account.

 

Sending them £130.00 only and thats all their getting.

just getting to double check their bank details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

My wife has just had 3 letters today:

 

Letter 1 from Payday Uk stating they have now sold the debt to PRAC Financial Ltd on 9th December 2016, giving a formal notice of assignment of the debt

 

Letter 2 from PRAC financial stating they now own the debt of £349.77 & B W Legal will be acting as their Agent.

 

Letter 3 From B W Legal stating as the agent for PRAC they are demanding full payment of a debt which was £100.00 and is over 5 years old.

 

If this debt is over the 6 years is it classed as statute barred and are all debts over this timescale removed from a credit file

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

irresponsible lending?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Well had a letter today stated " Letter of Claim " 5 pages in total.

They have confirmed if we do not reply by 6th August they will apply to the court for CCJ,

they are asking for income details and the following

 

Letter Reply form

 

Box A - I agree to the debt

Box B - i owe some of the debt

Box C - I don`t know about the debt

Box D - I dispute the debt

Box E - I will pay the debt now

Box F - I will pay but need time to pay

Box G - Getting advice

Box H - I have provided documents

Box I - I need more documents or information

 

Lists Particulars of Debt

 

Debt dated 29th November 2013 assigned on 9th December 2016 to PRAC Financial

 

My question is

should we wait until they issue court CCJ

or send off for more information including signed paperwork etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant issue a CCJ

you mean a claimform.

 

and it doesn't say WILL anywhere go read it properly!!

 

you need to follow as

here

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no!

you must reply if its a letter of claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have they sent you this:

PAP blank reply form.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you must reply

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks

 

will send off paperwork and see if they reply,

 

strange as they have not chased for along time was hoping it was SB account.

 

Thinking back it was not repaid and dates back to Nov 13.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then its not SB'd……………

 

post up your reply 1st here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just subbing your post, I have had the same.

 

They say my agreement is dated * 2014 and yet I have had no credits to my bank account at all from Payday during 2014.

 

I am going to ask what bank account they paid into and on what date.

 

Check your bank account as well.

 

Surely, if your agreement is dated whatever you requested a loan from them on that date and you would have received monies from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

We have had a letter today from B W Legal with heading Letter of claim relating to very old debt from 29th November 2013, they have sent emails offering 65% discount etc. they now have given date 23rd November to repay or face action they have enclosed particulars of claim and Annex 1 information sheet, reply form asking for debt points 

 

 Box A - i agree i owe the debt

 

Box B - I owe some of the debt

 

Box C etc to Box G 

 

and requesting income details as well

 

Should we do nothing and wait 

 

Thanks for help 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will gather this is a PDL of some kind?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...