Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/cohen claimform - Ex Barclays card 'debt'


Aliw04
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys.

 

Revived a letter from hoist portfolio holdings who seems to purchase debt from MKDP LLP Ex Barclays card for the sum of £2978.

 

The court sent a letter for mediation service which I agreed n sent back.

 

However this card I had long time ago n I was paying minimum agreed payments until 2015 (I think).

 

I moved address few times n my financial situation changed quit a lot.

 

I tried to look for original agreement and last card statement but was unable to find it.

 

What is the best way to approach this matter.

 

Should I ask their solicitor Chohen for original agreement and last transaction statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Wali and welcome to CAG

 

We need some more info :-

 

!. When was this a/c opened.

 

2. When were you unable to make minimum pay'ts.

 

3. When was the a/c defaulted.

 

4. Is this debt showing on your CRA files.

 

5. I assume you received a county court claim and you've acknowledged and defended.

 

6. Do you have statements that show if you paid default charges in the past.

 

First off, you need to send Cohen a CCA request.

 

We may need to move this to the Legal Issues forum.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Wali,

 

If we're to help you deal with this, it would be better if you replied more quickly.

 

I'll move your thread to the Financial Legal Issues forum.

 

Read this and post answers to the Q's - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Ltd

 

Date of issue 23 October 2016

This was the first notice they issued and I partly defended it.

But I received the response from court that part admission was not accepted.

So I received another notice on 9th January 2017 offer mediation which I have acknowledged.

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.This is for sum of 2253 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account no.xxxxxx pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974(CCA)

 

2.The debt was legally assigned by MKPD LLP (Ex Barclaycard) to the claimant and notice has been served.

3.The defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA.

 

4.The claimant claims.

1: the sum of 2253

2: intrest pursuant to s69 of the county court act 1984 at a rate of 8.00percent from the 18-09-2013 to the date hereof 1094 is the sum of 540.

3: future interest accruing at daily rate of 0.49

4: costs

 

What is the value of the claim? 2253

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before 2007. (2005)

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

Why did you cease payments? Change in circumstances.

 

What was the date of your last payment? it .was in 2013. Not sure about the exact date

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? NO

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the first notice they issued and I partly defended it.

But I received the response from court that part admission was not accepted.

So I received another notice on 9th January 2017 offer Mediationlink3.gif which I have acknowledged.

 

can you expand on the above please.

 

I think you mean that when you got the claimform

you returned it saying partial admittance?

then you recently got the N180 about mediation [was this the 9th jan form?]

that you said yes too?

 

But I received the response from court that part admission was not accepted.

^^what do you mean by this?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right. First I part admitted.i was nervous and couldn't remember if I have owed that much. Then on 9th January I acknowledged the mediation.

 

9th Jan court firm said.

1 this is now a defended claim. The part admission was not accepted

2 it appears that this case is suitable for allocation to small claim track. If you believe this is not appropriate track for claim, you must complete boxC1 on small claim directions (Firm N180) and explains why.

3: you must by 26 January complete form N180 and file with court office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant

 

 

ok so you sent that to the court [the N180]

and you sent a copy to the sols?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you send a CCa request

and

aCPR 31:14 when you got the claimform?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good you're getting there....

 

did you copy your completed n180?

if you did

then id recommend to send cohens a copy of it.

 

have you popped up on the MCOL website and viewed the status of the claim?

 

once you log in

there a link that shows you whats going on

like in this thread...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475065-MMF-Moriarty-Law-claimform-old-Mr-Lender-PDL-Loan-debt-(2-Viewing)-nbsp&p=5001275#post5001275

post 10.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it might be wise for you to file our holding defence if it lets you on mcol.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I registered with MCOL. Tried the claim number n password sent on court letter which was sent first on 20 sep. but it dint let me log in.

The other letter by court sent 9th Jan doesn't have any password on it.

I dint kept the copy of N180. But Cohan sent me their copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have been waiting for their response but so far they haven't got back to me.

 

However I have received a letter from Robinson way a debt collection agency.

 

They wrote

"we have noted the query/dispute you raised.

We are dealing with it in in the due course we have stopped all collection activity on this account "

I never heard of this company before.

What I should do next. Please advise. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are hoist

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why you don't wan them to respond

no papers = no debt!

 

they lose hands down..

 

why don't you ring the court tomorrow

and ask the status of the claim

and whilst you are at it

see if they can get MCOL going for you.

 

have you tried it again since...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

looks like it as they exchanged N180's.

 

so the claim is stayed Wali?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would check the status......if DQs were submitted by both parties...then it would have proceeded to allocation.....so either the claimant didn't pay the hearing fee or the OP never went to trial and has a CCJ or the claim was discontinued.

 

It cant be stayed if DQs were submitted.

 

All guess work when the OP leaves a gap of 12 months between updating his thread.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never get to file defence. The dint even show on my credit file (ClearScore) anymore.

 

Sorry for being naive but what is DQ and OP means ? 😬

 

The letter states:

 

We refer to the matter above.

Please find enclosed for your reference a copy of regulated credit agreement, statement of account and notice of assignment.

We now invite you to submit your proposal for payment outstanding.

Should we not hear from you within 14 day we have no alternative but to seek our clients instruction to apply to the court for judgement against you.

We trust that this clarifies our position and looking forward to hear from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...