Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old MBNA Credit Card debt > Aktiv Kapita > PRA > Brodies LLP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here's my summarised situation.

I'd like any advice on how I should proceed now.

 

Took out a Credit Card with MBNA in 1999

 

Through their unscrupulous lending,

my own stupidity & intermittent mental health issues,

I ran up a debt that I couldn't pay off

 

I started to have problems meeting my minimum monthly payments in 2010, and requested a temporary interest freeze when it got really bad

(thought this was 2011, but now realise it was probably 2012... further explanation below)

to help me to sort our my finances.

This request was ignored.

 

After several months I stopped paying anything and prioritised other debts.

 

Eventually defaulted in 2012

I started to get harrassed by Aktiv Kapital

Over time have now been chased by PRA, another couple of agents and back to PRA

 

At one stage,

not sure when but probably 2012/13

I requested proof of the debt being owed to Aktiv Kapital/PRA?,

and didn't receive that proof.

 

At the time I downloaded a template letter to send,

but not sure where from,

but it included the sentence about not admitting to the debt.

 

Due to not receiving the proof requested I didn't enter into any communication with any of these companies again.

PRA continued to harrass me.

 

I wouldn't hear from them for months and would then be bombarded with telephone calls as well as letters.

I didn't answer the phone to them or respond to their letters.

 

Over time they have offered a discount on the debt several times

 

In June 2016 they advised by letter that they were considering passing the case to their Scottish Solicitors

 

I received a letter from Brodies LLP in July 2016 stating they had been instructed by PRA to pursue recovery of the debt and threatening court proceedings.

 

I panicked!

I was convinced at the time that it had actually been in 2011 that I had last communicated with the original lender and sent a Statute Barred letter.

 

I heard nothing back and when a couple of months passed with no communication I thought I had heard the last from them.

 

On Saturday I received a letter from Brodies again (6 months later) which included a copy of my original Credit Agreement and copies of the final few months of statements of my account with MBNA showing I made a payment in August 2012.

 

This letter states that

"To avoid this matter being passed to our Court Action Team, you are required to pay the Debt or contact us to discuss a suitable payment arrangement not later than 2 February 2017"

The amount of the debt being chased is £5781.16

 

Are they allowed to only give 4 working days for me to contact them?

 

Are they allowed to come back to me after 6 months of no communication?

 

Am I entitled to request proof of ownership of the debt by PRA?

 

Should I contact them tomorrow?

I am not in a position to pay this amount.

 

Part of me says,

I borrowed the money and should accept that it eventually needs to be paid.

 

However, if there are any loopholes I can use to my advantage then I'd like to try to use them, as for the first time in 20 years I have all my other debts under control and can't believe this has come back to haunt me.

 

I've tried to read as much as possible on other threads, but got really confused by some of the terminology being used, so apologies if I should have been able to find my answers elsewhere.

Edited by missjam
Link to post
Share on other sites

.....throw the morality card that you had the money so must repay it out the window now.

 

/...if you did owe anything now..., then why did a big mutli national creditor sell the debt on to a debt buyer and write it off and not take you to court and crush you themselves...???.......urm.........

 

all the players you mention are all part of the same 'group'

so sadly you fell for the oldest trick in the book that DCA's pull...

 

you fell for the perceived web that the debt was somehow 'going up a chain'

that was a notion that they painted

you fell for it and responded...mug caught in the headlights...doh!!

 

back to basics....

 

its a 1999 mbna card

they'll almost never get an enforceable agreement nor the right sets of T&C's together

other than raiding their filing cabinet and faking it, from MBNA should you CCA request them...[no WAIT]

that WAS what you got or signed

other than an application form which doesn't contain all the prescribed conditions correctly.

 

so bearing that baseline in mind...

 

did you take this out whilst resident in Scotland

and are you at the SAME address as your take out date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thankyou

can you please scan up what they have sent as an agreement & T&C's to ONE multipage PDF

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's got to be the very 1st time we've actually seen the reverse of their postal application form ever..

the T&C's make refs to conditions in the bottom right like see 14.1 etc

they are not on that page

did they send page 3?

 

 

I also notice PPI ticked

i'd expect PPI running from 1999 to wipe any debt out even £5k they are claiming you owe

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPI was my first thought too

 

 

having looked at the statements I have I wasn't paying it.

 

 

I found one very old statement from 2002

(I think! will check when I get home this evening) that also didn't have a PPI payment on it,

I assume I cancelled it.

 

 

The job I was in when I applied for this card didn't last long and I became a student a month later so I possibly cancelled it.

There is no page 3 of the application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they are missing an important part of the CCA return then.

 

 

and where the statement of account, did they send one...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it should have come wit the CCa return as its part of the requirements

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So at this stage I've now not met their deadline to get in touch. I'm wondering if I ought to be sending something about the CCA being incomplete? Or do I sit tight and wait for their next move?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you certainly don't invite letter tennis no.

its also not relevant to tell them the CCA return might not be compliant

that's not for you or them to speculate upon

 

that for a Sherriff to do, IF it ever gets that far.

 

the overriding fact here

[but its not unusual mind]

 

is that MBNA sold a very large debt on.

why?

they could have crushed you in court but didn't....urm..

 

but as I said, that's quite typical of MBNA

and seems to be the remit of the American consortium that at the time had purchased MNBA credit card division.

 

its now I think back in the uk and owned by Lloyds I think.....I read.

 

the bottom line is:

 

PRA are only interested in fleecing money out of people

like all DCA's

 

so have seen +£5k here and have put it thru their PC threat-o-gram machine.

 

if any human has actually had a part in this yet is to be discovered..i doubt it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have failed to give you an annual statement of account

( should have done this every year since the debt was sold to AK, along with a notice of assignment), j

ust an old card statement from before AK bought the debt so not CCA compliant.

 

 

Debt looks like it will become SB in sep/oct so do nothing for the moment and they will probably let the clock run down too long to actualy take action by the time they do try again and you tell them they have got it wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of ifs but mays might's and instructed there

IMHO ignore too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...