Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council PCN issued on private land split car park Coalville, Leicestershire


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A few years ago my local town centre car park was covered in snow and the bay markings were covered.

 

People parked in an orderly manner but when the snow melted most people found they had been ticketed because they were not parked in marked bays, fortunately I was not one of them.

 

However last week I found out that the car park is actually private land but the District Councils civil enforcement officer patrols it and issues tickets.

 

My question is what status do the tickets have, private parking charges or council issued fines?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that if the parking company really thinks that it is going to enforce the parking bay markings, and it has a contractual responsibility to clear the entire car park of snow so that they are visible.

 

I think what we are hearing here is a scandal that all sorts of perfectly reasonable and ordinary people are doing their best to use the car park correctly and in an orderly way – and no doubt are paying the required fee for parking – and yet receive a ticket because the parking bays were not clearly marked.

 

Which parking company is this? Do you know anyone at all who has been affected? I think this is the kind of thing that I would be contacting the local newspaper about because I'm sure that somebody would be interested in running a story and that they would then be contacted by drivers who had been affected.

 

I would recommend in the strongest terms that anyone in this situation who has received a ticket should stand up to it and defend it – with a very high chance of success, in my view.

 

These private parking companies are parasitic and in the circumstances that you describe, they are clearly attempting to suck their pint of blood and drink it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said in my post

this actually happened a couple of years ago and quite a bit of fuss was made at the time.

 

I don't know what the outcome was as I was not personally affected.

What I was asking is if a ticket was issued would it be a parking charge I. E a private ticket or a parking fine?

 

The car park is privately owned but patrolled and ticketed by a council employed warden.

This is a real situation not hypothetical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it in Farnham?

 

I know that the private co bloke that wanders around the Maltings car park also works for the council and you will find that the private parking tickets look identical to the official ones and are in the same plastic envelope but the payment details are different.

 

I have reported to the council who say " nowt to do with us guv" so you will have to fight each and every ticket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is in Coalville, Leicestershire.

The warden that patrols and issues tickets is the genuine council civil enforcement officer.

 

There are two car parks side by side separated by a grass bank.

 

One is council owned land and therefore the CEO is entitled to issue fines

but the other is owned by the company that own the shopping mall

so I wouldn't have though that the CEO had any power to issue fines.

 

I do know the difference between fines and charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

and?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does the Signage at the entrance and within the Car Park say?

 

I would contact both the Company that owns the shopping centre and the Local Authority for clarification.

 

Contact the Company that owns the shopping centre to confirm they are the Landowner of that specific Car Park and if they have given the Local Authority permission for there Civil Enforcement Officer to Patrol and issue Parking Tickets in there Car Park.

 

Contact the Local Authority and ask them what agreement/permission is in place for there Civil Enforcement Officers to Patrol and issue Parking Tickets in that specific Car Park.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

I have raised this before but cannot find the thread but in any case I want to take the matter further.

 

My local council issue parking fines on land owned by a private company. They have also installed ticket machines on the private land.

 

I would like to know what information I should request from the council to establish whether they have the legal right to issue these fines on private land.

 

It would not surprise me if they didn't have the right as they are well known for making up their own rules as suits them.

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which LA is this?

 

Where is the private land?

 

Have you taken any photographs/evidence?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged for history

to find your thread

simply click your username

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one mentions several Coalville carparks:

 

VT33

 

It's the last one on page one of schedule 1. Belvoir Shopping Centre/Market Hall Carpark (part)....not sure what 'part' means.

 

Thanks for finding the original thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone needs to look up the land on the council's map of what they own and then whack in a complaint to the council director of amenities of whatever dept is in charge and ask them who owns the adjacent land and then when you have that answer ask why they are trying to enfoce an order that doesnt apply.

 

You then take it to the local govt ombudsman if they dont correct their error. You should also send copies of your correspondence to the landowner as the owner of the land might not like someoe trying to appropriate their land and the rights that go with it.

 

I would lay bets that an error has been made on the drawings and someone is too arrogant to admit a mistake has been amde and will just let things run rather than look stupid by having to correct it and possibly pay back monies to motorists who have been trapped into paying up

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Councils can enforce private car parks, mine does the local Waitrose and Morrisons car parks who owns the land has little to do with it.

 

Surely that would mean they're public then?

 

Bromsgrove District Council enforces the local Morrisons car park too, which makes it public, not private.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the council can enforce on land that "has been appropriated by them" so they will have to prove this. I cant see that Morrisons has given away the rights to that land lightly becasue they would also give the council the right to slap a bus staion or similar on it so again checking the permission would be a must.

The OP's case refers to part of land and that scenario has cropped up many times before where somewhere like a market square is not a single plot of land and subject to different conditions that the council parking wardens dont seem to know about so I would always say that it shoudl be challenged and the council provide the evidence they do have the right to enforce rather than take their word for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is another way the council can enforce on land adjacent to a public highway and that is via the decision of Dawood but that relies on both proximity and delineation. However, that doesnt apply to somewhere that isnt a highway so 2 adjacent car parks wouldnt have the same rights to enforce as would parking next to a road behind a building in a town centre for example

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...