Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ACI/TM legal claimform - old Lending stream PDL ***Struck Out Twice & Costs***now third claim issued


mame
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Due next Tuesday mame ...I will be shortly drafting the same defence for yourself and Burgesfan...same claim same date in the link above provided by DX.

 

So keep an eye over the next few days.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim for reference only

 

1.Asset Collections and investigation purchased this debt from the lending stream and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise.

 

2.The defendant failed to respond from the claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion

 

3.asset collections and investigation claim this amount in respect of an unpaid loan funded by the lending stream.

the defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

 

4.the claimant claims interest under section 69 of the county courts act at a rate of 8% a year from 24/06/2016 to 06/07/2017 on £677.11 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.15.

 

7th July 2017

 

£835.37

 

 

 

########Defence########

 

1. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The claimants claim is denied having previously issued the same claim on xxxxxxxxx in the xxxxxxxxx County Court claim number xxxxxxxxx which was presided over by District Judge xxxxxxxx (See exhibit 1a)

 

3 . The claim was Struck Out on xxx xxxx xxxx by the aforesaid District Judge.Therefore the claimant is precluded from reissuing the same claim pursuant to res judicata and therefore is barred from re-suing a winning defendant on the same cause of action. (see exhibit 1b)

 

4. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO no

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious, but can

 

"2.The defendant failed to respond from the claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion"

 

really be a valid grounds of claim in an English court?

 

For it to be valid wouldn't there have to be a legal duty on debtors to engage with creditors for the purpose of "attempting to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion"?

 

Is there such a duty?

If not how can you bring a claim of the basis of breach of a duty that doesn't actually exist?

 

Or this this just any old carp they think might make someone pay them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it should read......2.The defendant failed to respond to the claimant

 

they just need a little more practice drafting particulars.....:madgrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I have looked at the sanctions order and the claimant have failed to comply , they had till 17th sept to comply but did not untill the 27th sept.

Why are the court so lenient?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raise it within your witness statement and ask why?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have news, I received a letter from the court that there will be a preliminary hearing .

 

The court is is considering striking out the claim on its own intiative because the claimant has neither

1 explained its absence from court in case ........... on may .. th 2017

 

2 explained its failure to comply with directions in that case

 

3 confirmed that it has paid costs awarded in that case

 

It does not say anything about sending witness statements but i will be attending and taking all my paperwork .

 

is there anything else i should do?

thanks

Edited by mame
grammer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just attend the hearing and push for it to be struck out...the court could/should impose sanctions

 

I assume the claimant has requested relief from sanctions...hence the hearing

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well done mame..hopefully that will be an end of this nonsense.

 

Thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done mame..hopefully that will be an end of this nonsense.

 

Thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thanks Andy I did ask the judge can you stop another claim , he said its probably at that stage now and if a new claim was put in it would go to a higher judge to make an order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good News struck out again, The Judge made sure he put abuse of process on the order.

No show from the claimants ,

Thanks for every ones help. Special thanks to andy and dx :-D

excellent,

did you get all your costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the letter up please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CUSTOMER REFERENCE:

CURRENT OUTSTANDING BALANCE:

 

Dear

 

Welcome to Motormile Finance UK Limited (MMF).

 

We are writing to advise you that your lendingstream.co.uk account has been sold to Motormile Finance UK Limited (MMF).

 

We are pleased to advise that upon purchasing your account, we have removed interests and charges totalling £40.00 applied by lendingstream.co.uk, as a gesture of goodwill.

 

Whilst the conditions of your account will not change, we have allocated a new reference number (shown above) which replaces any previous reference numbers you have had, if you have existing accounts with us. You must now use this reference in all future correspondence or contact and ensure that you send all payments and communications to MMF using the contact details found here at http://www.mmile.com or by visiting our self service portal at http://www.mmile.com/myaccount

 

Click here to download your goodbye letter from lendingstream.co.uk, please note you will need to enter your date of birth.

 

 

The transfer assigns all of lendingstream.co.uk’s rights as the owner to Motormile Finance UK Limited. Your legal rights will not be affected by this transfer. The effect of the legal assignment is that MMF now own the debt and perform all obligations as stated in your agreement, this includes the collection of any outstanding balance.

 

How we help our customers;

 

Tailor an affordable repayment plan and give you peace of mind that this is set up – if you have an existing plan with us we can adjust this to include this account. If this is the case you will need to call us and we will do this for you.

 

Ensure that we are always flexible and put the customer first.

 

Never expect you to pay more than you can afford.

 

Offer our expertise in dealing with sensitive and or difficult circumstances

You can manage all of the accounts you hold with us, and set a payment plan securely by registering with our secure on line customer portal at http://www.mmile.com/myaccount

 

If you would prefer you can email us at [email protected] or call us on 0113 887 6876.

 

If you would prefer to set up a standing order or direct debit without registering on our portal we have attached a mandate here for completion and return.

 

We will send you a statement of your account shortly for your ease of reference and look forward to hearing from you within the next 5 days. However, if you believe any of the information we hold is incorrect, please let us know immediately.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Motormile Finance UK Limited (MMF)

 

 

 

Please note: if you choose to communicate with MMF by email, unless otherwise advised by you, we will accept this as your consent to use your personal details to contact you by electronic means (email) with information about your account(s) which may include collections activity, negotiations and other services and products.

 

We are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of consumer credit regulated agreements.

MMF is the trading name of Motormile Finance UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06637307.

Our registered office is Protection House, 83 Bradford Road, Leeds LS28 6AT. http://www.mmile.com

convert-jpg-to-pdf.net_2017-12-15_21-07-53.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...