Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What is a Bond?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2685 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Probably the wrong forum but don't know where else to put this.

 

On Friday I received a letter from the DWP. Enclosed was a letter from the same pension company that my (very modest) lump sum pension payment came from a few months back. Same company, different department it would seem.

 

Anyway, the letter reads:

 

Dear X

 

Our Ref: Final Salary XXXXX

 

Dear Mrs X

 

Bond: 123456/1 (not the real reference number)

 

There is a benefit due to you for the above bond.

 

Now, I'm very intrigued and of course, it arrives on the Friday and I can't find out what it is until tomorrow.

 

I do remember some 30 years ago when the company I worked for had a meeting with some financial advisor for everyone them extolling the virtues of the pension plan they'd chosen for us - in their own words at the time - the best money could buy.

 

I have vague recollections of the advisor saying something about investing a portion of our pensions in the pension scheme itself and something about the remainder but what exactly I can't recall.

 

Anyway, despite searching the Net for information about Bonds, most of them seem to relate to American Bonds and the only information I can get for this country are ISAs. Whatever this Bond is, it was long before ISAs.

 

If anyone can shed any light on this, please let me know otherwise I will have to kick my heels until tomorrow.

 

Not clued up on financial institutions or products I'm afraid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you work for a gov't / public utility and opt out of gov't scheme? [superannuation etc]

 

 

this would have been in the 1990's?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bond "should" be a Gov backed security, that pays a fixed return per annum. The general rule of thumb is that when interest rates are rising then the price/value of bonds will fall, and if you are living through low interest rates the price/value rises as the bond offers better return than sitting in a bank would.

 

Basically, they are among the safest places to invest your money for a low risk investor, however the current returns offered by bonds are pitiful Imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you work for a gov't / public utility and opt out of gov't scheme? [superannuation etc]

 

 

this would have been in the 1990's?

 

No. Worked for the gov in the 1970s and that one's already taken care of.

 

During the 1980s and 1990s I worked in the oil industry and this one, I think relates to when I worked for one of the largest offshore contractors in the world - an American company.

 

Thanks also to WarrenBuffet for explaining a Bond.

 

When I find out tomorrow what this is, I'll let you know but whatever it is, it certainly isn't something I was expecting or even knew I had.

 

Think I'll go and play my piano - less painful than kicking my heels :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may very well have a high yielding bond 6%>, that may very well be a very valuable asset and highly liquid in the current economic situation.

The questions you need to ask is, 1.) What is the % yield on the bond?

2.)How many more years are left on the bond?

3.) What is it's current market value and is it one bond or 100's or 1000's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...