Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Understanding my Pension Statement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2688 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning. Firstly, sorry about this post being crammed into one paragraph! I can't seem to edit it to how I'd like to present it.

 

I have a couple of questions as I'd like to be pre-armed with a tiny bit of knowledge before contacting the pension provider/financial adviser.

 

I have a pension plan with Zurich, which was formerly with Allied Dunbar, which I haven't contributed to for many years. Firstly, should I be concerned that a Financical Adviser company has written to me (last year) to inform me they have taken over from Zurich Assurance Ltd in handling my pension?

 

The statement is on Zurich letterhead with the new company's details on the right hand side. But, the main reason for the post is to just understand the basics of what the statement is telling me. It's showing two parts: EXCLUDING FORMER PROTECTED RIGHTS BENEFITS = Total Current Value of £6,301 FORMER PROTECTED RIGHTS BENEFITS ONLY = Total Current Value of £71,365

 

My questions are: Does my pension 'pot' literally consist of these two combined? When I reach the age of 55 next August will I be able to access the full amount? It's a small pot, therefore of course, I don't consider this is going to be providing me with a regular income at retirement - therefore the likelihood is that I'll take the 25% tax free amount and then go with one of the options available for the remaining.

 

Hope that makes sense and thanks in advance for any replies. Stuarto.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.

Bank Charges:

First Direct: £250 settled at Prelim stage 3.4.07. :-)

Intelligent Finance: £798 settled at Prelim stage 1.6.07. :-)

Woolwich: £1178 settled at Prelim stage 20.7.07. :-)

 

PPI:

Barclaycard: £1103.67 settled at S.O.C. stage 2.8.11. :-)

Credit Card Charges:

Barclaycard: £926.38 settled at S.O.C. stage 4.8.11 :-)

 

Thanks CAG and all those who've helped me on the forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to raise any questions like these with Zurich and get the information in writing.

 

I think you need it from the horses mouth, rather than an online forum. If you don't understand a pension scheme, you need the company doing the pension admin to explain about your rights.

 

I thought the Government were going to stop people aged 55 or over withdrawing all of the available pension pot money. Again a reason for Zurich confirming your rights, if you wanted to access the funds next year.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically a pension is divided into 2 bits because you have opted out of the govt SERPS whilst it was active. What your pension is worth is the 2 amounts combined. Before you make any decisions on moving your money you need certain information such as what are the current management fees- the maximum under current rules is less than 1% but older schemes will have much higher fees so that can make it worthwhile moving the money elsewhere anyway. Secondly what is the cash in value as some schemes have a big penalty of what they like to call "market rate adjustment". Again, on newer schemes they just have a buy/sell price on the units in the scheme so it is easier to calculate what the real cash value is. The older scheme may take a massive slace for their supposed adjustment. It theoretically pays for the sudden selling of all of your shares held in trust at a loss but in reality they just take a massive cash slice to punish you. Thirdly you will want to know if you can take the whole sum as cash, a partial settlement to ease the tax liability and whether you can transfer part of it out to another scheme.

They may force you to see a financial advisor who will charge you £2k to do nothing useful if you actually want the cash.

Theoretically though you can take the whole lot as cash. You cannot take 25% of the pot tax free and leave the rest where it is, the tax free bit is a portion of the amount you take out of the scheme so if you withdraw £50k you get the first £12.5k tax free and the rest is treated as income for the tax year so will bump you into the higher tax bracket. Take out £20k and you get £5k tax free and then pay your normal tax rate on the remainder so 20% for most people

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...