Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Stupidly accepted an offer from Wonga


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Since 2012 I have taken over 35 Wonga loans, these have been anywhere from £100 up to £1,000 a time, paying well over £3k in interest.

 

I submitted a claim out of desperation last year and when they offered me a refund on four of the loans for £800 I snapped and said yes due to my immediate need for cash.

 

Since doing that I have learnt that I was wrong to accept so quickly and that they were probably in the wrong for most of these loans as they were often being used in conjunction with up to 6 other pay day lenders.

 

Since i accepted this compensation for the four loans, does this close the door for me to appeal further?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gensk121 and Welcome to CAG

 

On the offers you accepted...was they direct with the PDL Companies or through the FCA/Ombudsman ? Were the offers agreed in writing as full and final settlement?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy and thanks,

 

Direct with Wonga, I've copied the email below of the final response:

 

Our Understanding of the Complaint

 

You say:

 

* We did not take appropriate measures to establish affordability and the loans were not suitable for your long term needs. You experienced a cycle of payday lending and increased debts and your financial situation became worse because of the payday loans.

 

To resolve the complaint, you want the interest and charges applied to the loans refunded to you.

 

Our response:

 

Having carefully reviewed the records of the loans you took, we accept that five of the loans may not have been affordable in their specific circumstances. We have listed them in the table below.

 

We do not, however, accept the other loans were not affordable because;

 

* Looking at the loan amounts borrowed, we consider each amount for the loans represented what we considered a reasonable amount of your stated monthly incomes of £1000 and £1500 that you provided on various applications.

 

* We are not aware of any other factors that indicated unaffordability.

 

We do sympathise with your situation, however, we do not have any records to show that you contacted us about financial difficulties during the time you have taken your previous loans. Our Hardship Team is in place to discuss your circumstances and the way forward with your loans. Although we are expected to treat you positively and sympathetically, it does not follow that interest or charges are automatically suspended because you are in financial difficulties.

 

In regards to being left in debt due to the loans, we do not agree that we disadvantaged you financially by lending to you. You approached us for financial assistance and as we do on all the applications, checked if you were eligible for the loans. We feel it reasonable that you could have approached other lenders in the market if you were unhappy with our lending terms.

 

In regard to the loans that you may have taken from other lenders to repay your loans with us, while we feel this was your decision, you may want to contact them directly to discuss your situation.

 

Outcome

 

Based on the above, we intend to uphold the complaint in part. Therefore, we would like to offer you by way of compensation, £696.19 an amount which is equal to the interest and fees on the loans. Additionally, we will also request for the redressed loans to be removed from your credit record. This may take up to 30 working days to be updated fully on your credit file.

 

Date

 

 

Loan reference

 

Amount

15/04/2014

£243.27

 

 

30/06/2014

£166.38

 

 

15/06/2014

£124.15

 

 

16/05/2012

£126.52

 

 

26/04/2012

£35.87

 

 

Interest of 8% simple per year has been added to the total redress for each loan from the date the loan was taken out until the date of calculation. Please see the outline below.

 

interest and fees

 

£696.19

 

8% interest net

 

£104.83

 

total settlement

 

£801.02

Edited by Gensk121
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks...well there is nothing there about F&FS so if you feel you require further redress then I would think the door is still open...although I do feel Wonga have been quite reasonable.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...