Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

capquest scottish 1a small claims - old cap1 debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

hope this is in the right area.apologies if it isnt.

 

Ive received a small claims summons from capquest in regards a debt they purchased off capital one on 30 november 2012.

 

After reading many pages on here,

would i be right that the first port of call is sending a postal order for £1 and asking for the CCA?

 

This is through a scottish sherrif court if that makes any difference

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG

 

We need to know more about the debt. Please follow this link, copy Post #1 and paste here with your answers to the questions - leave out any personal or identifying details

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the Scotland forum as litigation is different.

 

can you tell us what you have gotten.

 

I take it this was served by a sherrifs officer

walker love or whomever?

 

what type of claim is it a claim 1a small claim or?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?428590-You-have-received-a-Claim-**ISSUED-IN-SCOTLAND**-What-you-need-to-do.

 

yes CCA request MIGHT be the first move

 

pop the required info ive asked up 1st please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? capquest

 

Date of issue – return day is 27th december

- served 24th november but not to me personally

 

What is the claim for –

 

The parties are as designed in the instance.

The named defender resides at xxxxx.

The defender has been so resident for more than three months immediately preceding the raising of this action.

The defender is domiciled there.

The court accordingly has jurisdiction.

There are no proceedings pending before any other court involving the present cause of action and betweenthe parties hereto.No agreement exists prorogating jurisdiction to another court

 

The pursuers are a finance company which inter alia operates the business of debt purchasing.

By virtue of a debt purchase agreement between the pursuers and Capital One(Europe) plc dated 30 november 2012

the pursuer acquired the right to payment in respect of all debts and other monetary claims of any nature due to owing by the defenders to capital one(europe)plc which were in existence as at the date the said agreement was entered into in relation to the contract herinafter condescended upon.

The said assignation was intimated to the defender by way of written notice on or around the date of assignation

 

The said contract between capital one(europe)plc and the defender is dated 14 february 2011 and relates to credit card agreement with account number xxxxxx.

The said account is in default and the sum due there under is due and payable now.

As at the date hereof, the sum due in terms of the said agreement amounts to £1300 conform to copy statement of account which will be produced in any defended process to follow hereono.

In terms of the debt purchase agreement hereinbefore condeccneded upon, the right to receive payment of the sums due on terms of the said statement of account vests in the pursuer.

 

The defender has been called upon to make payment of the sums sued for.They refuse or at least delay in doing so.This action is accordingly necessary

What is the value of the claim? £1300

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? after

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? unsure

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? believe so

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? unsure

Why did you cease payments?couldnt afford it

What was the date of your last payment?dont know

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? ???

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it was not served person to person?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

i'll post something tomorrow or later if I find what i'm looking for.

 

DONT do anything yet

nor entertain or talk to anyone for now.

 

99% of cabot/capquest Scottish claims fail if you defend it

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to gander back ground info which is always useful:

 

who served the papers?

have you received any previous letters regarding this debt and who from?

if you didn't, why not?

have you moved since you took it out?

 

what/where court served it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant find the thread I want we have database errors at present.

 

but.

 

I have done 8 of these now.

below is a scan of a return of page 7 of the summons I ve used before

 

just be aware you WILL need to attend the court

but its probably an open one where ALL summons are heard infront of each other once you sent back the form as I have done.

 

obv if YOU are going to attend

don't blot out the wrong bit , mine are where I am attending on behalf of.

 

i'd get that in asap once you've answered my q's above and I say its good to go in.

 

its better that way

rather than wasting time on a CCA request.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to gander back ground info which is always useful:

 

who served the papers?

have you received any previous letters regarding this debt and who from?

if you didn't, why not? have you moved since you took it out?

 

 

what/where court served it?

 

 

shoosmiths LLP is the solicitor that is working on behalf of capquest,

 

 

its from stirling sherrif court but it says service on defender is falkirk.

 

 

I've moved twice since i took it out and it was registered at my parents house

ive no idea as i was rarely back there to open mail.

 

 

never received anything recorded delivery or anything like that

Link to post
Share on other sites

who served the papers personally on your father not shoes

they are solicitor representing capquest

 

the sheriffs officer...walker love, scott and co?

they should have given your father a covering letter with their details as there is one attached to the courts copy to say it was handed over in person

they cannot use post whatever format.

 

but don't worry too much

so see the attachment in post 10

that's your next step IMHO

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

seems like the usual score.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well court date on tuesday and no paperwork has been delivered so what should i expect at court?

 

Another continuation or will the judge throw it out?

 

Can i ask for it to be thrown out as they are obviously not coming up with it any time soon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hope the sheriff sticks by his words.

 

you can politely point out that they obviously knew from date [you returned the form]

that they would need paperwork and to date some XX weeks later they still haven't provided any...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hows this going

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ask for it to be a decree of absolvitor

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they rolled into court today with a credit agreement but no statements even though the sheriff had said they couldnt.their argument was that they only received it on friday.continued for another 8 weeks to produce the statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

incredible!

hope it had T&C's and the default notice too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
incredible!

hope it had T&C's and the default notice too?

Hopefully the final update on this.

 

Court again today and they still hadn't produced the statements

 

the sheriff dismissed the case with no expenses.

 

He did say that they might try again further down the line.

 

Many thanks for all your help.

 

Just goes to show that these companies think they can bully people but some very helpful advice shows otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...