Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

47K Unsecured debt advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Just looking for some advice on what I should do going forward. For the record I am a resident in Scotland.

 

I have accrued around 47k of unsecured debt among six creditors in the UK.

 

1 Ratesetter £23.8k P2P loan

2 Barclaycard CC £4.9K

3 Tesco Bank CC £5.9k

4 Virgin Money CC £6.2k

5 Hitachi deferred payment £4.5K

6 V12 Secure Trust Bank £1.8K

 

I am now at a point that I am about to start missing payments and will end up defaulting. I have spoken to step change who have recommended a DPP under the Debt Arrangement Scheme as I have a flat with equity that I wish to protect.

 

While this is the formal way of things I thought I could perhaps try the informal route first and doing a self managed DMP with it being more flexible and being able to pay off creditors with lump sums if I can get some overtime built up.

 

I filled out my income/expenditure sheet and included this in a letter to each of my creditors explaining I can no longer service my debts and included a revised payment amount (pro rata of £585 surplus). The letters were sent 1st class recorded signed for. All direct debits have been cancelled today also.

 

I assume it is now just a waiting game for their responses? I reckon they will more than likely reject especially Ratesetter - this is the debt I am most worried about as it's a high amount and essentially other peoples money.

 

Am I doing the right thing here? Should I just be going straight for the DPP to save any court cases?

 

Any help or advice on the matter is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

none are secured on your property?

when did you take them out

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi none are secured against my property.

I don't recall the exact dates however;

 

Ratesetter feb/March 2016

Tesco CC sometime around 2012

Hitachi deferred payment September/Oct 2015

Virgin CC summer 2016

Barclays summer 2016

V12 April 2016

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Scotland there is a network of legal/debt advice centres with experts on Scottish law. You might want to see what you can find out locally, to see what you can do. They will want to see your finance agreements. Then at least you will know more and be informed about decisions you may take.

 

Stepchange as the major debt charity are recognised by finance companies, so you are more likely to be taken seriously. If you try to do it yourself, then they might not be as helpful.

 

These are all recent debts, so not much scope for ways to deal with them. If there is a temporary financial problem, then best to agree to some repayment arrangement based on affordability, where they freeze interest/stop adding charges. Then see how it goes and make decisions when you need to. At some point, if you cannot repay, then presumably they can try to obtain a charge against your property.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ouch all recent then.

 

where that £25k all gone in 6mts?

 

nationaldebtline & their website is good on Scottish stuff and they are impartial.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly wish I knew.

For the most part the loan paid some things off while,

I needed new windows put in,

had massive problems with my car at the time,

so paid off the existing finance and got shot of it,

had some large vet bills as well and had relied on credit a few times to get me through the months.

 

Silly,

but what is done is done and I have unfortunately learned the hard way.

I am committed now to getting myself out of the mess I'm in so will attempt the self managed side of it.

Thank you for your replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there ANY other creditors which should be included?

 

Generally speaking, every organisation you owe money to should be included when you are trying to make pro rata payments from your "disposable income".

 

For example, you shouldnt be paying 1creditor in full if others are being asked to accept reduced payments.

 

Is this a temporary situation or is this how things are for the foreseeable future?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi All,

 

I like many others got myself into a bad situation and had the oh bum moment around two years ago.

I sought help and almost entered into a DAS (Debt Arrangement Scheme which is a formal Scottish debt solution) but decided against it and went for a self managed DMP first.

Safe to say I'm glad I did so far.

 

Going forward I'd like to be rid of this burden as soon as possible so I can begin to move on with my life so looking for any advice going forward.

 

I had multiple creditors, one was my mortgage, one was my car, the rest were unsecured credit agreements, cc's and a loan.

 

I stayed up to date with one credit card, my mortgage and my car.

The rest I stopped paying and allowed them to go into default etc. and set up payment plans

In December I plan to clear my up to date credit card balance which will leave me with the car and mortgage still active and the following in default;

 

Tesco CC - default still with Tesco.

Barclay Card CC - default, sold to PRA group.

Virgin CC - default, sold to Cabot. They have previously offered to settle for 60% twice.

Hitachi Loan - Late Payment, sold to Lowell (Hitachi never defaulted prior to selling)

Ratesetter Loan - Default, Scott and Mears acting on behalf of OC. This is the youngest default at June 2017 they took their time to default.

 

These are all "recent" debts taken out after 2012.

Best to carry on with the DMP and saving up for a hopeful full and final or should be I sending any particular letters to the DCA's?

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you CCA'd them?

 

PRA cabot dont chase legit debts. Lowell are very shady and theres usually something wrong with the debts.

 

CCA everything and also SAR the OC's so you can see exactly what youre dealing with. Never blindly pay.

 

Also NEVER under any circumstances consider a full and final to a DCA. Especially when you havent checked the debts validity.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

always CCA. Doesnt matter if its recent or not.

 

And yes, sar the OC's, including the ones that havent been sold on. You want to know everything about your debts before you start arranging payment plans

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the ones that have been sold on, do you CCA the original creditors as well as the DCA's?

 

Should I be cancelling the payment plans that have been in place for the last year and a half prior to sending these?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA everyone. Keep payment plans in place until they default on your CCA request. They get 12+2 working days to comply. The day it expires, if they havent fully complied, you stop payments until they do. ESPECIALLY if those payment plans are with DCA's who will NEVER have any paperwork or info for the debt unless you specifically request it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be aware that the paperwork they send may very well be compliant, but its a very good idea to get as much info on the debts as possible so you can decide on your next move.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive merged an old thread and this op is in Scotland so remains in the Scotland forum .

 

go get your credit file.

lets see what damage is done

like defaulted dates please.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,

 

 

1 Ratesetter (Scott Mears acting on behalf) default date: March 2017.

2 Barclaycard CC (Sold to PRA Group) default date: Feb 2017.

3 Tesco CC (Not sold or passed on, in-house collections) default date: Jan 2017.

4 Virgin Money (Sold to Cabot) default date: June 2017.

5 Hitachi (Sold to Lowell) No default date, late payment markers only, around Jan-March 2017

Link to post
Share on other sites

ratesetter was a form of PDL was it not...irresponsible lending complaint time?

 

as for the other yep a CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ratesetter was a Peer to Peer loan so don't think I have grounds for irresponsible lending.

 

 

Great, I'll draft up some letters tonight to get posted Monday/Tuesday. Is the below template still the go to? Send recorded with a crossed postal order enclosed?

 

 

[removed - dx]

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does the top red line say?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that particular line doesn't show up on the mobile browser very well - found it on the laptop.

 

 

Amended the template to suit and printed off the CCA letters ready to post tomorrow. In terms of the Ratesetter loan, do I send the CCA to the debt collector acting on behalf of Ratesetter or to Ratesetter directly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you send it to the DCA's stated client.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats because they rarely ever are able to obtain the paperwork. Also it shows that they , and other DCA's chase people without even having the paperwork needed to do so.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...