Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

old LLoyds 2008 ccj bought by Link


vetse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ccj obtained by Lloyds 7 years ago and has been sold to the above Muppets, with the proper paper work, the assignment and court papers

 

.it was a credit card from Lloyds taken out in 2003

.Original order was 37.50a month but have only been paying 17.50 for the last 2 years

.Lloyds never seemed to mind.

 

There now demanding 3 x 37.50.

 

Help ,should I send them a cca request?

 

I believe it is unenforceable anyway with it being over 6 years?

Edited by vetse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy to answer.

What rate did the court set?

Thats what you pay no matter what link try and say

. Theyd have to have their name substituted on the CCJ,

then go to court for a redetermination of the amount,

 

youd be asked to attend and supply your I&E.

 

theyre chancing their luck.

 

Theres nothing they can do, so just continue to pay what the court told you to pay.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court set it at £37.50 a month, and I have been paying 17.50 for the last 2 years with no letters from Lloyds

 

.Since they have owned the debt since June they want the full amount the court ordered.

 

Annoys me they can just sell it on and I honestly feel I wont pay them anything now and take my chances.

 

I have also moved address and know then can only act upon the ccj on my previous address

.I believe they cannot enforce the ccj as 6 years have elapsed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they can enforce it

You've been paying it

 

Sar time to Lloyd's

Look at penalties and PPI

 

CCJ trumps the CCA requirement

 

OK they'd have to get a change of claimant

Might not happen

But I bet it will

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took your advice.

 

Surprisingly they were nice and have set up an affordable repayment plan with them.

 

They also advised they had no intentions of enforcement if I at least paid something each month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't say to do that!

 

ofcourse they'll be nice to you

they want money out of you to fund their fleecing of 1000's of others.

 

it was a more wait and see post.

 

urm..

 

I take it you phoned them up...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" and have set up an affordable repayment plan with them."

 

How?...hope you have not given them your bank details ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took your advice.

 

Surprisingly they were nice and have set up an affordable repayment plan with them.

 

They also advised they had no intentions of enforcement if I at least paid something each month.

 

That's because you're being cash cowed and they're laughing hard in your face because you're willingly giving them.money they could never touch otherwise.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That could be a bit harsh as we dont know what sum was agreed.

 

If it is less then £37.50 then I would go along with it as long as the debt has been properly and legally assigned.

 

As the OP is currently silent on this matter we may think that this may not be the case but that is conjecture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

important word here 'could' not would or will.

 

no-one said blindly set up a repayment plan.

 

how have you done this?

not by phone I hope

and not by giving any card etails

nor by direct debit?

 

you need at worst to only ever use a standing order with a fleecing DCA

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS AND HAVE NOT MORE LEGAL POWRS THAN YOU OR I.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be Standing Order NEVER a Direct Debit, SO is fixed and cannot be unilaterally varied by the payee, whereas a DD can be unilaterally varied by the DCA, who can then syphon a bank account at will like the energy companies who hike the payments at will.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cash cowed?

Everyone said it could be enforced.

Set up at £5 per month.

what was I suppose to do

 

You do as you feel fit and comfortable with vetse...no one is being judged here.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

answer post 11 questions please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pers I'd cancel that dd

 

Have link ever written to you

And did they refer to the judgement

 

It worries me that they blindly accepted £5

As they'd go for the full judgement if they could

 

Something smells

Can we see the letters please?

Upload to pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Been a while I know and did listen to your advice, but for the sake of a fiver thought why rustle feathers.

 

They have contacted me for an update and review.

 

I,m worried this may escalate.

 

I hung up on them.

 

Thankyou everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct you never talk about debts over the phone

writing only.

 

can we see these letters please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ is not in their name

so i'd just keep paying what you have been.

 

did you get that SAR off to Lloyds to see if theres stuff to reclaim like PPI etc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will a SAR not stir a wasps nest as such.

 

Will do it tomorrow as they nicely provided me with the card number.

 

What would my future options be with this.

 

Debt still stands at 19k.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to do with Lloyds they sold it get that SAR to Lloyds running

 

19K, blimey

have you still got all the court paperwork ?

 

somethings not sitting right with me here on this

no mainstream lender would allow a £19k card debt to evolve

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...