Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Limitations act and taking training provider to court under mis-sale


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I apologise for the length of this, this is a shortened version believe it or not! :)

 

Hi,

 

I'm wondering if anyone can give information on the limitations act before I open a court money claim.

 

a company sold me an IT training course in 2007,

4 courses totalling £3700

and the finance was to be paid over 3 years.

 

Paid them for about a year and done the first course,

ran into financial difficulties in 2008,

 

wrote to finance company who never responded

(they claim they sent an Income/exp. form,

they wrote to me after this and tried to attach the income form they sent but instead sent me someone else's agreed repayment plan)

 

Debt collector took over in 2009,

i had a separate contract for the training course and a separate contract for the finance as they were two different companies

 

The debt collector said I could no longer do the training course unless I paid £40 per month

and the finance company has taken legal advice about this,

which I didn't pay so they then sent a £75 cancellation fee to write it off, I didn't pay this either.

 

At the start of my training the training provider wrote me a letter thanking me for my payment and the course was paid in full by the finance provider.

 

I wrote requesting that 2 of the courses be refunded as I hadn't started them or receive the course materials,

they replied saying they can't as monies and materials have passed hands from the finance provider to the training provider.

 

In 2009/2010 I found reports online about the contents of the courses saying they were worthless

 

it also became clear the tactics the sales advisor used in my house were wrong (100 complaints gathered by BBC watchdog),

I was lied to and they never delivered any promises,

 

They didn't chase me for the money again until I sent a data request to the training provider in 2011,

requesting some details

 

in March 2012 the finance company appointed another debt collector who tried to collect on behalf of the finance provider

and added £800 charges in the space of 3 days

(balance letter from finance provider on 3rd shows £2600, first letter from new debt collector on 6th of the same months shows nearly £800 increase.

 

Used logos from companies on the front of their material and website that they did not have permission for,

pretending to be a member of a code of conduct when they were not.

 

There are many more problems I had and things I've found that builds a big picture of how they basically [problem]med me, between the sales advisor, course materials, false promises and more.

 

I know I'm far to late to tackle the sales pitch and lies

I'm wanting to take them to court for misrepresenting it to me,

 

trading standards said as its over 3 years

they can't bring any criminal charges against the company

(I spent about two hours last week with someone from trading standards showing him what I've found)

and he didn't know much about the limitations act, much like myself.

 

I know it has an exception to the 5/6 years and this time limit won't begin until I notice the breach,

can I use this as my point,

meaning I'm still within this time period?

What other things should I be aware of?

 

I've been round every lawyer in my town and couldn't find someone to take it on,

I went round every lawyer last week who say they don't specialises in that,

they tell me who does,

I visit them and they tell me they don't specialise either

(if the company broke my arm or injured me they would specialise in that :) )

 

I've been in correspondence with the training provider recently who returned a data request showing I still owe money even tho the letter I got in 2007 days paid in full,

 

the finance company has clearly clawed money back,

as they both have the same director

I seem to be the only one who isn't getting back what's due as now

 

I've sent my EVIDENCE,

the training provider wrote back saying the complaints going in circles

and they are no longer willing to speak to me but will speak to a legal representative working on my behalf.

 

They quote the limitations act as the start date of my contract and ramble on about the defamation act, saying most of the information online isn't true.

 

My information comes from the national web archives and emails from the companies who's logos they used,

I've forwarded all information onto the relevant bodies who's endorsements they used but some have replied saying it's too late for them to do anything.

 

The finance provider is on the deadline 40 days for a data request which it looks like I won't receive,

most likely because I was never sent the letters they claimed they sent,

meaning they probably need more time to "create" these letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1000's of like threads here

if you search their name in the search cag box of the red top toolbar

 

I would be VERY careful.

they are very clever and have friends in high places.

 

ive popped you in the student training forum.

use the search have a read

have a think about it...HINT HINT...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spend the last month gathering information, its took over my life haha bit I've never been this confident and it's all my own research and nothing is misrepresented.

 

The limitations act is the only thing stopping me from opening a claim in the small claims court, need to know the exact rules surrounding this act as it's not very clear. I wrote to them in 2012 asking for a refund due to mis-selling so this would be my point for the start of the 5/6 year time limit, meaning I'm within the time (just) but someone else mentioned something about 3 years :S

 

if I can't figure out the limitations act I'm going to open a case regardless as that will give me a sure answer from a judge., it's basically going to cost me court fees to settle my mind haha I know they will use this act as their defence and therefore I want to be armed with a counter argument for this before I start a claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Thought it would give an update on this 1 year on.

 

Still no refund.

 

I'm pursuing the finance provider. Submitted a data request to them, thu cashed the £10 fee and ignored the request.

45 page complaint went to the ICO.

They lied and said the request wasn't addressed to them.

 

Pictures I took of the letter and postal order before sending with their name debunked this.

They then said they sent the data as a gesture of goodwill but it was never received,

couldn't prove they sent it or that it was received,

didn't send by recorded mail.

 

ICO ruled that they should have complied with the request within the 40 days,

ordered them to send my data and told them that they need more training.

Finally got my data 4-5months after making the request.

 

Finance company Always claimed my allegations had no substance and sent me a 44 page booklet detailing how all the information on the internet is false,

the booklet detailed a lot of defamation against someone else who had got a refund for their course.

 

I forwarded this booklet to the individual who was detailed in the book who now has a barrister and lawyer working on a defamation case against both the finance and training provider, I'll likely also be a witness if it goes to court.

 

I compiled a 250 page complaint, 7 pages of which were an account of everything that happened.

Also discovered that the debt collector instructed by the finance company to collect the outstanding amount in 2009 was a dormant,

non trading company using someone else's FCA number.

 

Finance company objected to the ombudsman looking at the complaint due to the passage of time.

The advisor also agreed and wrote to say they can't look at the complaint as I got the course in 2007 etc...

 

Waiting to hear their outcome and are using them as a form of ADR.

 

I asked for a true copy of my contract with the finance provider who sent me a true copy of the front page and rather than sending me a true copy of the back page they attached a completely different set of terms.

 

Luckily I still had the original and the new terms printed directly on the back have changed the jurisdiction of the law from "the country your are domiciled in" to "the English courts have exclusive jurisdiction"

 

I'm in Scotland, they clearly don't want me taking them to a Scottish court.

The solicitor for the training course has been in contact with me and their isn't a single bit of truth within their letter.

 

I will get my refund.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...