Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HPH2/Cohen Claimform - old HSBC Credit Card 'debt' ***Claim Discontinued***


RU753
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Could you help me with a Northampton county court claim dated 13 sep 2016 which is for £935.50 + interest.

I have acknowledged it online and the issue date is 13 Sep 2016.

 

Claim History

A claim was issued against you on 13/09/2016

Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 22/09/2016 at 20:20:43

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 23/09/2016 at 08:01:36

 

I want to dispute the whole claim which I have told the court online as im not sure about this credit card or when it was taken out as at that time I had so many debt but im not sure which one this is.

 

Which forms do I need to send off to the claimant and the solicitors.

 

CCA and 31:14?

 

Any help will be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

Name of the Claimant ? HOIST PORTFOLIO HOLDING 2 LTD

Date of issue – 13 Sep 2016

 

Particulars:

 

1.The claim is for sum of £935.00 in respect of monies owing under an Agreement with the account no.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA)

The debt was legally assigned by MKDP LLP (Ex HSBC) to the Claimant and notice has been served.

2.The Defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the Agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA.

 

3.The Claimant claims

1.The sum of £935.00

2. Interest pursuant to s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00percent from the 20/04/11 to the date hereof 1968 is the sum of £400

3. Future interest accruing at the daily rate of £ .21

4.Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £935

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Not sure

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. HPH2

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I can remember

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I can remember

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? I had a few debt and lost my Job and had to stop paying all of my debts but i'm not sure if this is one of them.

What was the date of your last payment? Not sure

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Not sure

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

Yes I did pay some of the other debts but I really can't remember this one.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so

CCa request to the claimant

CPR 31:14 to Cohens

 

 

don't sign ANYTHING

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

 

 

might give you more info if you go check your credit file

see if this debt shows.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I gather from you mentioning MKDP that you've prob had ots of various letters over the years

some dates on history would be nice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks allot DX, :-D

 

I will check the credit file as I didn't think of that.

 

Could you please check the red parts of the CCA and the 31:14 as im not sure if they are ok and if im asking for the correct stuff.

 

[templates removed - dx]

 

alot of the letter went in the bin as it was sent to my old address but then I changed my bank address about 5 months ago to my new address and I received a letter saying court action will take place and soon after I received the CCJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

please read the top of those letters.....

 

 

and you've not got a CCJ

you've got a claimform...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opps, yes its a claims form silly me. :-)

 

 

please read the top of those letters..... which ones?

 

On the CCA you gave me a link to its asks to pick s.77/78/79 (delete as appropriate - see post 3 below) on post 3 it says credit card is 78 would I take out 77 and 79?

 

s.77(4)a/78(6)a/79(3)a(delete as appropriate) which part do I delete here?

 

 

On 31:14

 

1. The agreement...

2. The assignment by MKDP LLP.

3. Default notice.

4. Contractual payments.

 

is it the above what I need to ask for?

 

Thanks for your swift replies DX

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they both say what right at the top....

PLEASE DONT PUBLISH IN THE OPEN FORUM......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opps, yes its a claims form silly me. :-)

 

 

please read the top of those letters..... which ones?

 

On the CCA you gave me a link to its asks to pick s.77/78/79 (delete as appropriate - see post 3 below) on post 3 it says credit card is 78 would I take out 77 and 79?

 

s.77(4)a/78(6)a/79(3)a(delete as appropriate) which part do I delete here? a credit card is what ....78 ...so work it out...

 

On 31:14

 

1. The agreement...

2. The assignment by MKDP LLP.

3. Default notice.

4. Contractual payments.

 

is it the above what I need to ask for? what is mention in their poc..

 

 

 

Thanks for your swift replies DX

 

 

no being funny nor obstructive

but its a legal process and you need to understand why and what..

everyone else manages..

take your time.

dont need posting till the morning.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you want them to lift the sig and place it on fake paperwork..

not that any DCA would ever do that of course...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please just get on with it

we've done 1000's of claims here

 

 

they do not need to be signed.

READ THE 2 FULL THREADS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the clickme links where you got the CCA and CPR from

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello dx,

 

I have received a reply back from Robinson way and Howard cohen

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BytXDIYLA5NNOVNRc2hWQkNoS0U/view?usp=sharing

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BytXDIYLA5NNNU9rY0swWUgtZlE/view?usp=sharing

 

Please could you tell me what I need to do now?

 

Many thanks,

RB

 

Also, my last day to put my defence forward to court is in 4 days time on the 16th.

Link to post
Share on other sites

both std letters they send to everyone.

if you had looked at any other like threads here

 

 

as for your defence

likewise you need to go look at like other threads

I cant see you've actually viewed any others ??

 

 

this is a self help site too.........

 

 

have a go at a defence

post it up

and we'll help

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have looked at other posts some people send a defence saying they didn't get the documents requested and some people ask for an extension but id like some more to read could you give me some links which I could look at which are similar to mine, please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you do not want to give them more time to magic up paperwork...old hat

 

 

copy and paste your thread title

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

search cag box of the top red toolbar.

 

claimform credit card debt 2016

 

by old hat I mean that's a old defence you must have read.,

 

its a speculative claim

hoping for a non contested [defended] default rubberstamped judgement

where nothing is checked.

 

you defended now put them to strict proof to PROVE their case

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ford,

 

Could you check my thread and advise me on which document or template I need to send as a defense now? dx is helping me but the more help I get the better.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?469936-HPH2-Cohen-Claimform-old-HSBC-Credit-Card-debt&p=4950011#post4950011

 

Many many thanks,

ru753

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...