Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA GROUP claim form - old provident loan 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


Liverlass
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I received a court claim form from the company in the title.

I have never heard of them before

 

they are claiming I owe £1110.41 with court fees of £70 & legal costs of £80 on top,

so are taking me to court claiming I owe them the total of £1260.41

 

I've spoken to debt helpline who told me to accept I owe the debt from 2012 which is less

& offer payment plan within the 14 days of the letter.

 

Then she gave me links to find a legal aid solicitor or I'll get it ruled against me & get a ccj.

Do I just have to accept this & pay the extra?

 

Can anyone advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED

Date of issue – . 19 SEP 2016

 

Date to submit defence - 21 OCT 2016

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The Claimant claims the sum of 1110.41 for debt and interest.

2.On 20/7/12 the defendant entered into an agreement with Provident Personal Credit Limited for a Loan under reference *******

3.On10/2/14 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of 953.40.

4.On 26/8/14 the debt of 953.40 assigned to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS, Oslo, Zug Branch, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group (UK) Ltd on 31/12/14 Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. The sum of 953.40

2.Statutory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 26/8/14 to 16/9/16 157.01 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.21 until judgement or sooner payment.

What is the value of the claim? £1260

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2012

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim .PRA group

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Cant remember

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Unsure

 

Why did you cease payments? Financial problems, lost job, ill from mental health

What was the date of your last payment? 2014 to original lender

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

yes, used debt company & they didn't pay who was owed, then informed of situation by letter & paid by myself monthly

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you

can you go up on the MCOL website and ACK [AOS BOX]

the Claim.

 

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked

 

get a CCA request running tot he Claimant

and

a CPR 31:14 running to their sols [PRA use in house so can be included with the CCA request ]

 

next

tell us about and name this DMC and what happened to your payments to them and when you latterly took over yourself.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?404049-Problems-with-DEBT-CORRECT-LTD-took-me-money-didnt-pay-debts

 

 

found it

i'll poss something there.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

look on the claimform...

 

theres a password at the end of the information box on the right

 

is that all that is in the Particulars of Claim box?

who was the original creditor please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't sure how much info to put on this post,

 

it says don't give any identifiable info.

 

Is this a closed & safe forum or can any company also read it?

 

What happens if the creditors we are disputing against recognise our situation?

 

Does it matter?

 

Found the password,

 

Is it Moneyclaim?

 

Still don't know what ACK [AOS BOX] is though sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean pra group

 

I wouldn't worry

we've never seen a claim 'lost' because an anon thread by anon member was found.

you simply just don't post your name address or any account numbers etc

the rest we need to see

 

esp the full POC

as that's what we need to base your defence on

the EXACT wording is very important.

 

as for mcol

 

https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/web/mcol/welcome

 

middle box register

 

then log in

and respond to a claim

 

follow that

 

ACK [acknowledge the claim] that will be the AOS box

defend all

leave jurisdiction untick

 

the just claim through a few pages and confirm

then exit MCOL.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll go through the claim on moneyclaim now.

 

POC - exact wording:

 

The Claimant claims the sum of 1110.41 for debt and interest.

On 20/7/12 the defendant entered into an agreement with Provident Personal Credit Limited for a Loan under reference *******

On10/2/14 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of 953.40.

On 26/8/14 the debt of 953.40 assigned to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS, Oslo, Zug Branch, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group (UK) Ltd on 31/12/14

 

Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. The sum of 953.40

2.Statutory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 26/8/14 to 16/9/16 157.01 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.21 until judgement or sooner payment.

 

Can they do that?

Can they claim money for the time the 1st company had it before being given to them when the 1st company didn't add anything on,

simply sold it on as they had received it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's better

std PRA POC lots of defences here already for it

but that's weeks away yet.

 

get post 4 done please

 

as for the bottom bit

they cant charge int from the day they got it as such

but that's for later

 

as for the names, they are the same lot not an issue

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and relax.

 

just for ref

so was this a doorstep loan that went south?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

only one with them?

or was this loan upon loan upon loan?

each extending or paying off the previous?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but

they had a nasty habit of taking money from whatever they gave you when you refinanced as the first payment...

that's a no-no as they cant do that until the 14 day cooling off period had expired.

 

lots of threads here on that...

 

the agreement and the agents payment book will be interesting to request too..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one loan then needed another for £200 a few months later,

 

I don't understand how it works,

 

he never explained any of it to me, just assumed I knew.

 

He took out a £700 loan that paid off what I owed on the original amount,

I had £400 cash but it was written that I'd had the £700 loan

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like the usual game

if when refinancing and paying off an old loan

he took the 1st payment for the new loan thee and then

that invalidates the agreement as you had a 14days cooling period

but await the CCA return

then we'll deal with it.

 

 

there are several past threads here to read .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not heard anything yet?

What is the next step?

How do I put together the defence?

 

Thanks

 

Searching for the threads to read but got confused,

tried reading the provident threads,

then also the PRA group threads.

 

I'm worried about how long I've got to prepare this defence.

 

All help is very much appreciated.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence is not due till 4pm 21st next Friday.

 

use the top red tool search cag box

 

pra claimform loan

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reveived a letter this morning returning to me my £1 postal order & the letter sent to them.

 

It's dated 11/10/2016 & says:

'I write with regards to your recent correspondence regarding the above account. Unfortunately we are unable to fufil your request as we have not yet completed the required security checks in order to verify your identity. The information we require is as follows -

 

Full name

Date of birth

Previous address and postcode

 

You can contact us via letter or telephone our office on 0800 877 8772 to complete the checks we are required to make, in line with the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Upon confirmation of the above details, we will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible.

 

Yours sincerely

 

How are they supposing to do the checks when they have returned to me my letter & the postal order?

 

They are stapled together & my letter has a sticker on it with the signed for bar code, my letter has 2 different date stamps on it, one is 10 OCT 2016 & the other has been stamped over my address & that one is BROMLEY 07 OCT 2016

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange for pra that's the usual hoist trick..

 

nothing to worry about

their problem not yours

 

just to check:

you've sent this from the same address as on the claimform? [your address]

 

and you've used the provident account number they quoted in the claimform poc?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes used the address they put on the form & the reference they used

 

I think its because my name has changed back to my maiden name, but the address is the same & so is reference number

 

The reference code they have put on this letter received today is different to the codes on the claim form from the County Court Business Centre. It's a new reference all together

 

No scrap that post, I've just found it. Its in small print underneath their phone number, its the PRA reference by the looks of it

 

Do I write to them giving them this information they require & put the letter & postal order they sent me back in with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok lets make it simpler

 

you must send the CCA from YOUR ADDRESS that is listed on the CLAIM FORM

and using the NAME [your name] listed on the claimform.

 

quoting you want the CCA for the Provident Account listed in the particulars of claim [there will be an account number there that you had with provident]

 

is that what you did>

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My name has been changed on the claim form online to what my name is now.

 

They had the wrong name for me as the agent never even asked me to confirm it when registering me in the 1st place. A lot of personal circumstances have happened since 2011 & legally my name has changed.

 

I'll send it all again registered post & see what reply they give this time

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...