Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Restons claimform 1998 HSBC loan debt


Janus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

please can you help me,

 

I have received a court claim from Arrow from Northampton Court,

 

for the claim of £4900, issued 8 days ago

 

was a bank loan issued opened up in 1998, ,

 

last know payment was 2008/9.

 

I have not acknowledged this debt, or any comms from me to Arrow

 

I have filed online that I will contest this claim, hopefully on Limitation Act 1980

 

can I now send off a CPR18 request to their solicitor ?

 

what is should I be asking for in the CPR 18 ? All of the below 5 details ?

 

1.The agreement/contract, including the specific Terms at the point the alleged Agreement was made and any subsequent changes.

2.The deed of assignment

3.The notice of assignment

4.The default warning letter

5.The default notice

 

(CPR 31.14 Request only worth doing if debt is over 10k. I may have this totally wrong..)

 

I have read that some people think that a CC Agreement request letter is not really useful (sorry, I cannot remember their reasons for stating this)

 

Is it worth it your opinion to request CCA from the DCA?

 

shall I ring up my old bank and ask them for the last payment date ?

 

thanks for all help in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Its either SB or more likely theyll never get paperwork for it, they know they wont, bujt theyve seen the amount, got greedy and are hoping you dont know any better.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to legals

 

please fill this out

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

you don't use CPR 18

and you can't ask for the deed.

stop reading the Freemen of the land twaddle on those sites

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of claimant = Arrow

 

date of issue = 16.8.16

 

 

 

Particulars of Claim

1.The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and HSBC dated on or about Mar 13 1998 and assigned to the Claimant on Mar 28 2014

 

2. PARTICULARS a/c no -

DATE ITEM VALUE 07/06/2016 Default Balance 4700.82 Post Refrl Cr NIL

TOTAL 4700.82

 

 

What is the claim for = £4700 ,

 

 

What was the date of your last payment = around 2008/9

What is the value of the claim? £4700

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? bank loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 1998

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. ARROWS

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No -

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

 

No -

 

Why did you cease payments? poor health, breakdown, life went down the pan, reduced income

What was the date of your last payment? around 2008/9 (need to clarify)

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

- left old address where all post went.

Was living with old buddy,

we only kept in touch via odd email once I left.

He returned 'not known at this address' on any post that came for me.

I have been traveling all over place through work, contract work.

He noticed the brown envelope looked bit official,

consequently sent me a scanned copy so I could respond.

ct2.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's great cheers

 

 

can you pop off to the MCOL site and go ACK [AOS} the claim

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked

and ill tidy the thread up

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

brill

 

ok yes this look SB'd so should be easy to kill.

 

if you are 100% certain you've not paid anything to any one

nor signed any letters referring to the debt to the OC or any DCA

then there no need to do CCA/CPR

you can file the SB defence NOW

 

and that should be the end of it

 

 

ok

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better luck next time Arrow and Restons!

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks renegadeimp & dx

 

with respect to the defence, I may be able to find old bank statement (gut feel is only a 30% chance of this) proving last payment.

 

if I cannot find these old statements, will I have to phone up old bank and try to get proof out of them for last payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No harm in ringing the bank and asking

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dx

 

with respect to the CPR 18 , I have read that it can be useful as a backup so to speak.

 

Unless the claimant complies with the request in the CPR 18 within 14 days , the claim will stand to be struck out and judgment awarded to the defendant on this basis?

 

(apologies if I have got this wrong, and I am talking out of my )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres what you do.

 

Phone bank, state account number, and get the last date of payment to them. Ask them to follow it up via email confirmation

 

If its not sb, get the CCA and CPR off and youll sink cabot instantly ( note: they'll try to bluff you and offer a discount. This will prove they have no hope)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dx

 

with respect to the CPR 18 , I have read that it can be useful as a backup so to speak.

 

Unless the claimant complies with the request in the CPR 18 within 14 days , the claim will stand to be struck out and judgment awarded to the defendant on this basis?

 

(apologies if I have got this wrong, and I am talking out of my ***)

 

Not so at all, for either a quick, or an automatic, strike-out : you do have it wrong.

 

For a start, the parties are expected to resolve exchange of information informally first : CPR 18 can only be used where the other side has already been asked for the information, and hasn't provided it.

 

Next, the key word in CPR 18.1(1) is "may".

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part18

(1) The court may at any time order a party to –

(a) clarify any matter which is in dispute in the proceedings; or

(b) give additional information in relation to any such matter,

whether or not the matter is contained or referred to in a statement of case.

 

So, if you ask for information and they don't provide it, you can apply to the court to make a CPR 18 order requiring them to provide the information.

 

To get a strike out using this:

a) The court would have to choose to make the CPR 18 order. They "may", but they don't "have" to do so,

b) The other side must not comply, and then

c) The court would have to choose to make an "unless" order requiring them to comply, or have their claim (in this case, or their defence if the defendant) struck out.

 

Can a claim or a defence be struck out by using CPR 18 to request information and not being given it: yes. But it isn't a given: the court isn't under an obligation to make the CPR 18 order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said ignore CPR 18

Get this is it sb'd or not answered stop faffin around on bs not important to you

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further reasons to ignore CPR 18:

CPR 18 does not apply to small claims, except that the court may, of its own initiative, order a party to provide further information "if it considers it appropriate to do so" (see CPR 27.2(1)(f) and 27.2(3)).

 

Mind you, at this stage the claim hasn't yet been allocated to a track ........... but I still wouldn't focus on CPR 18, if you have an absolute defence using the statute bar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your priority is to find out if its SB. Just pick up the p hone and call the bank

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your priority is to find out if its SB. Just pick up the p hone and call the bank

 

ok.

 

Thanks for clarification on CPR 18

 

I will keep you updated how goes

 

Thanks for all your help so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

update :

 

I have done some digging around on my backup drives, took some time, but I found some old Quicken Interchange Format bank statements I downloaded, back to 2001. I knew I had them somewhere.

 

They show that I was paying by direct transfer from current account to loan account on the 10th of each month up to end of 2002.

 

Then as of Jan 2003 there were no more payments. Each pass of the 10th of each month no more monies taken from current account for this loan. Plain as day.

 

Which is how I remember the loan account going, whilst I was with old bank. Think my thoughts back then were that someone at the bank must have hit the wrong button on their computer screen and not knowingly cancelled the transfer for each month.

Or just a good old computer bug :lol:

 

I can now print this electronic statements for my evidence.

 

is it N9 form I use ?,

 

is there any example defence forms on CAG ?

(apologies if they are in sticky or somewhere obvious)

Link to post
Share on other sites

right so you've proved its statute barred?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then no need to do anything more than file the SB defence now

on mcol website

 

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.

.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC] or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

..

..ends..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

they have 33 days to do 'something' else it gets autostayed.

 

 

next move is theirs not yours

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...