Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells/? claim form - OH's old Vanquis card 'debt'***Settled by Tomlin Order***


Myfamily
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sorry I forgot to update this thread.

 

 

I emailed Lowells and suggested a Tomlin order.

 

 

which they agreed to and was all signed off.

 

 

I suggested the order be for the balance on the statement minus any overlimit and late fees, and also referral fees, so total was about £500.

 

Many thanks to all here who helped with this :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well done MF...thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi Everyone, hope you can help me here.

 

I am pretty annoyed with Lowells at the moment. every month for the last few months I've been receiving a letter saying that I missed that months payment, I sent an e-mail querying this to Lowell and asked why I was getting this letter as I have not missed any payment.

 

I got this reply

 

"Apologies for the delay in response.

 

Upon investigation of your account, we can see that the Standing Order was agreed and set for the 20th of each month.

 

Our records show that a payment has not been made on this date since July 2017.

 

As the payments have been made late, the letter advising the payment was missed, is automatically generated and sent out.

 

I have amended the date of your payments to the 29th of each month. This should avoid any further correspondence for missed payments, that have, in fact, been made.

 

Please make sure that the Payment arrangement is adhered to in order to avoid any further legal proceedings.

 

Kind Regards"

 

I checked the paper work and previous e-mails and all says the agreement was made for the 28th of the month.

 

so I sent this reply to them

 

"Dear Sir or Madam.

 

I am not very happy with this response.

 

You have suggested that I set up a standing order for the 20th of each month when I do not receive payment from my job until the 24th of each month, so I went back through my documentation to check this and found an e-mail dated 21st Feb 2017 (a screenshot was inserted here)

 

which clearly states that the first payment was due on 28th Feb and then the 28th of each month thereafter, incidentally I made the first payment on 24th and it was confirmed as received on the 27th (as I had been given an incorrect reference number!) but even so this is again before the agreed date of the 28th.

 

Further to this you will find the Tomlin order itself states on the second page under SCHEDULE

 

that 1. The defendant agrees to pay the claimant the sum of £20 per month commencing on 28th February 2017 and thereafter on the 28th day of each month until the sum of £546.00 (including costs, interest and fees ) is paid in full.

 

I have given below a list of payments made by me, you will notice that ONE payment was a few days late - due to a problem I had logging into my internet banking (highlighted in green) but you will also notice that I paid Novembers payment twice! (highlighted in blue) so if anything I am actually paying a month in advance! (here I inserted a spreadsheet of payments that I downloaded from my bank account - not a statement but just a list of transactions to Lowell)

 

So in light of the above I would suggest that you adopt a slightly different tone. I do not appreciate this sentence in your e-mail below. "Please make sure that the Payment arrangement is adhered to in order to avoid any further legal proceedings. " and this sentence in your latter dated 30th May "please ensure that you maintain payments as failure to do so may result in further action being taken"

 

My payment arrangement has been adhered to bar one payment which was late which is explained above and was rectified as soon as I could.

 

My other query is that the Balance at the beginning was £546, I have made payments totalling £340 (as detailed above), so my balance should be £206, yet your letter dated 30th May 2018 states that my balance is £246, please explain this discrepancy.

 

I would like clarification on where exactly you have got the information that my payments were due on the 20th?, please provide copies of any documents you have that state this.

 

Thank you"

 

and today I have received a letter though the post (why not by e-mail I don't know!)

 

this letter states

 

"We refer to the above matter and e-mail dated 7th June 2018

 

We note the contents of your e-mail and confirm the the outstanding balance is calculated as such, the agreed amount was for £546, we have received payments in the amount of £300 . this leaves an outstanding amount of £246.

 

The following are the payments we have received

 

(and they have listed a load of payments the first 5 payments re all listed for the 20th July 2017! my first payment was on 24th Feb??? and my payment in July was made on the 25th July not the 20th!

 

Then their payment list goes

 

29/08/2017

26/09/2018!!??

26/10/2018!!??

28/11/2018!!??

28/12/2018!!??

then 26/01/2018 and onwards to 29/05/2018

 

they have not mentioned the double payment in November!

 

then their letter goes on to say

 

" These are the payments we have received from yourself with corresponding date, please provide a bank statement as evidence of any further payments made. once we are in receipt of this, we will be able to review any discrepancies with our finance team.

 

You will also note that in the latter dated 30th May we confirmed the the arrangement was set up for 29th of each month to avoid the missed payment letters being sent out to yourself by the system.

 

We apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused you"

 

Now I am really annoyed.

 

Can someone please help me with a response.

 

I am not sending them my bank statement - the list I sent them is a csv download from my bank account already!

 

Also their list of payments is all over the place!

 

and they haven't answered my questions about where they got the initial agreement date of 20th of each month from

 

not to mention late last paragraph about the arrangement date being set up for the 29th of the month, I asked them to show me evidence of why they set it up for the 20th, they're trying to fob me off and I'm not having it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is lowell...where there is no sense :-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone help me with reply please.

I want to tell them that

1. the list of payments I sent to them is a download from my online banking and so I am not sending them bank statements.

2. that their lists of payments is total rubbish!!

3. and that they have lied when they said that the arrangement was setup for the 20th

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply continue to make the payments on the due dates...keep your record...and stop payment when balance paid....leaving a balance of £40

 

There is no need to get into nonsensical letter tennis with the numpties...it will make you ill.....this is lowell...where there is no sense.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...