Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shop Direct / Lowell / Cohen Cramer Court threat Help


ITPR
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

around 11 months ago Lowell started sending letters

claiming money owed to them for a debt they bought from shop direct.

 

the amount they claimed was ridiculously high

when i received a letter i simply just binned it.

 

on the 26th April 2016 i received a letter from Cohen Cramer

saying that because i have ignored all previous letters from Lowell and Lucas Credit Services (client agent)

if i did not contact them within 14 days they would issue a claim in the County Court.

 

I decided to write to both Lowell and Cohen Cramer.

 

I sent Lowell a CCA request

 

I wrote to Cohen Cramer explaining that i had requested the info from Lowell as to ascertain where this debt

and the amount claimed had come from.

 

I asked Cohen Cramer to hold court action until i got the info.

After i sent both letter dated 3rd May 2016

 

i received a reply from Cohen Cramer dated 10th May 2016, stating that they had received my letter

and that their client has given them a minimum period of 45 days from the date to send the documents

which i presume they was referring to my CCA request.

 

I then received a letter yesterday, dated 16th July 2016,

attached to the letter was a double sided photocopy of a letter of assignment,

but no credit agreement (not even the standard 1 page photocopy with no signature).

This was not what i asked for from my CCA request to Lowell.

 

They have now stated that if no reasonable proposal is forthcoming within 14 days then legal proceedings will be instituted.

 

Just wondering if anyone could help and give some advice as i am unsure of what to do next.

I was wanting to contact Cohen Cramer again but i am not sure what to put in my letter.

 

any help would be greatly received,

 

thank you for your time

Letters From Cohen.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

willy waving ....??

 

until/unless they get an agreement it wont go anywhere.

when did you take the cat debt out.

 

sri internet is crap tonight here.

the NOA is all cohen themselves are required to provide you as the proposed claimants sols.

 

until lowells get the signed? CCA

no dice.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the catalogue debt was from possibly 3 years ago...

at the time i was struggling to make payments and was in quite a bit of financial difficulty caused by being off work sick.

 

i did notice the days leading up to selling the debt on shop direct added an enormous amount of interest to the amount that was owing to them.

 

Around £360+ was added onto the balance

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR to shop direct might be worthy.

 

if the account was opened post apr 2007

 

then they could well try their luck

and succeed with a recon agreement

and that might work

 

get that SAR running ASAP

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it a good idea to respond to the last Cohen Cramer letter that says

if i don't respond within 14 days they will continue with court action

just to hold action so I get all info from Shop Direct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

today i received another letter form Cohen Cramer,

with it was enclosed a 4 sheet credit agreement

also another copy of the letter of assignment plus a basic statement showing the totals for goods, interest, delivery and charges and also payments i made.

 

On the statement it also shows goods ordered in the last 3 years and payments during that period also.

 

On the list for goods ordered there are 2 items that under description have a '?'

i am guessing that they do not have the items on the system and maybe on a basic search they are unable to link it to an item (the items with no description totaled around £150)

 

the original goods were for a total of around £800 (which was my credit limit) after interest which was added just before the debt was sold on, delivery and charges for missed payments/letters/etc.. the total was raised to over £1,300

 

i can remember writing to shop direct explaining my situation and asking for all charges and interest to be frozen as i was having financial difficulties but they refused stating that unless it was done through either the CAB or stepchange or similar they would not be able to do that.

 

again the letter states from Cohen Cramer if not contacted within 14 days legal proceedings will be taken

 

any advice would be helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan up redacted agreement as a PDF please

 

Follow upload guide

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the date of the agreement please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ouch..the CCA could well be compliant then.

i'll pop back later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan up the rest please statements..

it looks like you had things on buy now pay later in terms of the interest

and when you failed that was added and the debt was sold on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am guessing some of the items may have been on buy now pay later but looking on the statement provided nothing is shown regarding which items these were.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather convenient that

Smells

Bet the statements are not on oc's letterhead?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the one page statement printout has a shop direct logo in the top right corner.

 

both myself and my partner decided to take a look on noddle to check our credit scores...

seems Lowell has been busy buying up debts.

 

there are 4 entries between us both showing up as we owe Lowell sums of money.

 

i think maybe our only solution is to get a financial statement off to them and offer a token payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poss but don't jump yet

 

Person I'd await the sar results

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know how much Lowell and their solicitors like to file county court claims by the ton

if there is a remote chance they could get something out of any.

 

 

the thing is if i write to them asking to hold off on any action until i receive documents i requested in the form of the SAR to shop direct, and also to enable me to seek legal advice, would they hold off or still try and put in a claim?

 

 

if i did write to them would it be a good idea to include certain things like financial difficulties and stress these difficulties are causing me just so that it is on record if they do file the claim..

 

 

. also if they did put in a claim after i had asked them to put a hold on it would,

that go against them if they did file the claim with the factors i had outlined in my letter?

 

 

after doing a budget planner i have an extremely small amount to offer all my creditors.

I may have to go down the route of token payments in the future anyway

but until that time i would like to get as much info as possible

 

 

. thanks for all your advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are prob already aware of your issues

and prob know the extent of your debts too.

 

I cant see any more begging to avoid court will/has/would makr any diff.

if they want to try a speculative claim

then they would have done.

 

the issue is you started letter tennis

and they now think they have you on a fish hook over a trout pool.

 

whatever they do

as you say they'll only ever get a very small amount

and a judge would not disagree with you either.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have sent off a letter to hold off any action for at least 30 days stating i am seeking financial help and building up a financial statement.

 

the thing is i have already checked my financial situation and my incoming is less than my outgoing meaning there is nothing to pay my non priority debts.

 

would my next step be to send them a letter asking for them to consider writing off the debt and then if that fails asking them to reconsider their decision, if they still say no then just offer a £1 token payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
willy waving ....??

 

until/unless they get an agreement it wont go anywhere.

when did you take the cat debt out.

 

sri internet is crap tonight here.

the NOA is all cohen themselves are required to provide you as the proposed claimants sols.

 

until lowells get the signed? CCA

no dice.

 

Sorry to jump in, just a quick question dx how does it work with a catologue online because there won't be a signed CCA, they just print your name in there for you ? and what's the difference what happened post 2007 regarding catologue's ? Thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...