Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyd sell 10yrs old Loan debt with CCJ/CO to Link - no-one has any records!!


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1857 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did not defend cos I only found out about that and many other things in 2015. The only reason I found out about this CCJ as I was digging through lots of other stuff and found a copy of an old 2006 credit report in a different company’s SAR paperwork and it was on there.

 

LR don’t hold anything I applied for official copies my deeds now say

 

3 (24.08.2006) Equitable charge created by a final charging order of the Brighton County Court dated 7 July 2006 in favour of Lloyds TSB Bank plc.

 

NOTE: No copy of the Equitable charge referred to is held by Land Registry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes well it would have been transferred to Brighton for enforcement of the charging order....Northampton only issue default judgment.

 

Northampton will have copies of the claim and judgment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shall I email them or ring them?

 

when I went digging on it before Brighton told me this

 

Charging orders are usually taken out in the court where the property is so you will need to contact County Court at the email address below. You should give them the name of the Claimant/person who took out the charge, if you know it, and you may have to provide some form of ID to prove your identity before any information can be given to you.

 

Local court then told me There was something on the court computer for roughly same date as charge was placed but they can't open the file as it's so old?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email or ring....You will need the claim number...but worth giving it a go .....but dont build your hopes up... it is 13 years old....and nothing you can do to alter it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This ok for court

To whom it may concern,

I am writing to you today concerning an equitable charge that, Lloyds Bank registered against my property on 26/08/2006 at Brighton county court Ranking 3rd on my Land Registry Title Deeds.

As it stands after applying for official copies

Land Registry have confirmed they don't hold a document copy

• Brighton court have confirmed they don't hold a document copy.

• My local county court (xxxxx) have confirmed they don't hold a document copy

• Lloyds Bank don’t hold a copy

The property this was registered at is xxxxxxxxxxxx

I have been advised to seek further information from yourselves as I am unaware how this judgement has occurred.

I hope you are able to provide further information on this with a matter of urgency.

I thank you for your time and look forward to hearing from you within 14 days.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I would ring northants bulk Monday, though they tend to be very busy early on Mondays.

ask for a copy of the claimform and the CCJ by email pdf.

 

reading through the thread

whatever happened to the ppi refund, it was very low compared to wht you shold have gotten, and ofcourse that should come off the outstanding balance which is why, if my memory is correct we hoped the refund would be greater than the value of the CO...equals shouldn't now exist?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ppi was paid directly to me.

Debt was sold during the claim

I will get on to them. I’m dont think link will be able to do anything in regards to this with it being so bloody old.

But Lloyds shouldn’t be named on anymore should they ? link should??

Link to post
Share on other sites

as andy says and I said earlier it makes no diff, its easy for link to get it done, same as prime did on your other thread.

 

it would be interesting if you were to phone Lloyds and tell tem you want to pay it off please can you put me through to the correct department...:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I wrote to Lloyd’s again the other week as id been speaking to mortgage advisor with regards to remortgage, asking them if they could not substantiate charge remove it. If they could would they agree to a deed of postponement.

 

He advised that welcome/Prime would probably not consent unless they were paid off.

 

So I’m waiting on a reply off Lloyd’s on this anytime now. Cos if they say no. Then I would seriously have to look at adding everything including prime in. Now with prime getting a settlement figure is going to be more tricky. :roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

so no-one has any records at all but the charge is still there...wonderful

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve rang the court a few times no luck getting through. I am waiting for an email response any day now.

this is just crazy! 

You think link would have applied to the court for proof  not tell me too.. seeing as they think they are owed the money 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lloyd sell 10yrs old Loan debt with CCJ/CO to Link - no-one has any records!!

Good morning,

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Please note your case has been transferred to the County Court at BRIGHTON.

 

As we no longer hold this case at the County Court Business Centre, I am unable to take any action or provide any updates in relation to this claim and you will need to forward your email to the relevant Court to be processed.

is it me or am I just going around in circles?? 2016 I got in touch with Brighton and they said I need to get in touch with my local court. Which I did.. 

Edited by cruzhughes
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply from Brighton

 

Dear Sir,

 

Thank you for your email, unfortunately as previously stated due to the nature of the case being very old we no longer have the file and it was before our electronic records began. We suggest you contact the claimant who may have retained some documents regarding the case. 

 

Kind Regards,

 

 

Im banging my head against a brick wall 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

From Brighton after me sending this 

Thanks for the reply,

 

The claimant holds no documents either. 

I have been everywhere to try and track this information down. 

 

As I stands I have a charge on my property which could cause problems if I wanted to remortgage or sell. But no one holds and proof. 

 

Is there any further advice you could give about removal of this charge please 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Thank you for your email, we believe that the land registry may hold documents relating to this case as it may be registered with them when the final charging order is made. We suggest you contact them for more information.

 

Kind Regards,

 

The land registry don’t unfortunately. After I had applied for official copies they then updated the register to state this this back in 2016.

Dear Sir,

 

Unfortunately we are unable to provide any further documents to what the land registry have provided due to the file being destroyed.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Still no closer 

Edited by cruzhughes
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...