Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/Cohen claimform - old Nationwide Credit card 'debt' - poss SB'd***Claim Discontinued ***


john118
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2419 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I am disputing SB status of an old CC debt with default date of March 2010.

No payment or acknowledgement was made ever since the default date to any of the DCA's who chased this debt.

 

The DCA currently chasing me had threatened court action to which I responded with the standard SB letter quoting the Limitation Act.

 

However they have come back stating it is not SB as the original creditor had received the last payment in July 2014, which is absolutely not true.

 

The only payment I made was in July 2014 of £1 fee to the DCA chasing at the time to produce the CCA

and I had clearly noted in the letter then that this is only to be used as fee for the CCA

and that I do not acknowledge any debt.

It was not towards the debt and certainly not to this DCA.

 

The interesting this is the outstanding amount quoted by the then DCA and this DCA remains the same,

i.e. they have not applied the £1 to the debt (and they should not any how).

 

Can someone please advise what should be my next action?

They seem to suggest in the letter that I shall be getting Claim forms soon.

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If memory serves me right, Lowell did this at one stage as did Muck Hall.

 

If they are trying to claim the £1 payment restarted the SB clock, a Formal Complaint MUST be issued. They know that if the case went to the FOS, they would be in trouble. The £1 is a statutory fee and must not be used for any other purpose.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive the CCA or have they acknowledge or request in some way?

 

Although the advice above is generally correct, I suggest that you don't ignore them but put them on notice that any alleged debt is statute barred. Draw their attention to the CONC rules http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?426148-CONC-7.15-Statute-barred-debts and tell them that they can either provide proof now or proof in court that a payment has been made. Tell them that the only payment which was ever made was for a CCA.

 

Tell them that if they persist, then you will make a complaint about them under CONC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks OD. All they have said is last payment made to original creditor in July 2014 without providing any details or any proof.

 

Even if they consider the £1 payment for the CCA as acknowledgment of debt, what is generally the Legal/Courts view on this? Are you aware of any instances where the Court had considered a CCA request with £1 payment as acknowledgment of debt?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Silverfox1961. I did receive the CCA from the the other DCA.

 

The current DCA have been vague saying payment was made in July 2014 but haven't given any details of what, how much etc, and the only think I can think of is the £1 CCA payment I have made to the then DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

name names please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi all,

 

After going back and forth with the DCA with prove it letters and saying that it is SB, the DCA didn't provide any proof but said that they received a letter from the card issuing bank that they had received a £1 payment towards the account. Please note they said "towards the account" and not "toward the debt".

 

I replied again and told them that it is SB and no payment or acknowledgement was made to towards debt in the last six years and asked for the banks letter (which hasn't been provided). I did not however clarify that the £1 was paid requesting CCA (within the last 6 years) as I thought this could somehow weaken my case.

 

However now they have issued a claim though Court. To begin with I have acknowledged the claim stating I will be defending the full claim and have 28 days to file my defense. I will start preparing my defense would need your guidance/help.

 

To begin with I contacted a debt charity who advised that asking for CCA (irrespective of the £1 fee payment) would be classed as acknowledgement! I was surprised and asked if they have any Court case examples of it and was advised they haven't seen any but it is their view and asking CCA means acknowledgement.

 

Is this true? Has any one come across a DCA succesfully arguing in court that a CCA request/£1 fee payment is acknowledgement and winning the case?

 

Thanks in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial legal Issues.

 

 

If you would read the following link then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are wrong again = the £1.00 fee is a statuary fees required for copy of an alledged enforceable CCA1974 and does not count - which debt charity? hence we say to write on postal order etc for statuary use only, meantime get your defence going but submit the day before it is due to be submitted as then they have no time to mess about and trash your defence,

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. It was National Debtline. I will draft my defence and post it here for advise.

 

Just another question. When I had requested for the CCA they did provide me with a copy. Now SB being absolute defence, would you suggest scrutinizing the enforceablility of the CCA itself and if not enforceable add this as well along with SB to the defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't mix anything with SB

 

 

get that link sorted

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Howard Cohen Solicitors

 

Date of issue – – 08/02/17.

I have already acknowledged the claim with intention to fully defend

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.This claim is for the sum of £6250 in respect of monies owning under an Agreement with the account number XXX pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA).

The debt was legally assigned by Nationwide to the Claimant and notice has been served.

2.The Defendant failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the Agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA.

3.The Claimant claims,

1. The sum of £6250

2. Interest pursuant to s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 percent from XXX to the date hereof of XXX days is the sum of £2700

3. Future interest and costs

 

Amount claimed: 6250+2700+court fees/legal costs= £9450

 

What is the value of the claim? £9450

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It is the debt purchaser.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Probably I did get a letter of assignment but can't remember exactly.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Probably I did get a Default Notice but can't remember exactly.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant at the time and without a job was facing financial hardship

 

What was the date of your last payment? Circa June 2009

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? No

 

What you need to do now.

 

Answer the questions above. As above in red

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA Requesticon to the claimant for a copy of your agreement

(except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts) I had done so previously and have a been provided with a scanned copy

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts. I shall sent the CPR31.14 request relation to Credit cards. I understand I should not wait for the claimant to respond to my request before filing my defence with 28 days?

 

Please let me know if you require any other information

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to hide names [other than pers info]

who was the original creditor please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the crux is this supposed statement of payment in 2014?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and that was the £1 for your CCA request that you made at the time?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well IMHO id be filing the SB defence then.

await and see what andyorch and others think.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...