Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Thanks all! My wife was driving at the time (took our daughter to get new school uniform) and I wasn't there so I'm not sure what the signage was actually like, but yes, Parkopedia says 2:30, so it's barely over that. I will check it out with her when she gets home later, I haven't even told her about this yet as she'll probably be quite upset. So - likely my best response at this stage is to just wait it out until a Letter Before Claim arrives?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/Cohen claimform - old Nationwide Credit card 'debt' - poss SB'd***Claim Discontinued ***


john118
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2418 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I am disputing SB status of an old CC debt with default date of March 2010.

No payment or acknowledgement was made ever since the default date to any of the DCA's who chased this debt.

 

The DCA currently chasing me had threatened court action to which I responded with the standard SB letter quoting the Limitation Act.

 

However they have come back stating it is not SB as the original creditor had received the last payment in July 2014, which is absolutely not true.

 

The only payment I made was in July 2014 of £1 fee to the DCA chasing at the time to produce the CCA

and I had clearly noted in the letter then that this is only to be used as fee for the CCA

and that I do not acknowledge any debt.

It was not towards the debt and certainly not to this DCA.

 

The interesting this is the outstanding amount quoted by the then DCA and this DCA remains the same,

i.e. they have not applied the £1 to the debt (and they should not any how).

 

Can someone please advise what should be my next action?

They seem to suggest in the letter that I shall be getting Claim forms soon.

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If memory serves me right, Lowell did this at one stage as did Muck Hall.

 

If they are trying to claim the £1 payment restarted the SB clock, a Formal Complaint MUST be issued. They know that if the case went to the FOS, they would be in trouble. The £1 is a statutory fee and must not be used for any other purpose.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive the CCA or have they acknowledge or request in some way?

 

Although the advice above is generally correct, I suggest that you don't ignore them but put them on notice that any alleged debt is statute barred. Draw their attention to the CONC rules http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?426148-CONC-7.15-Statute-barred-debts and tell them that they can either provide proof now or proof in court that a payment has been made. Tell them that the only payment which was ever made was for a CCA.

 

Tell them that if they persist, then you will make a complaint about them under CONC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks OD. All they have said is last payment made to original creditor in July 2014 without providing any details or any proof.

 

Even if they consider the £1 payment for the CCA as acknowledgment of debt, what is generally the Legal/Courts view on this? Are you aware of any instances where the Court had considered a CCA request with £1 payment as acknowledgment of debt?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Silverfox1961. I did receive the CCA from the the other DCA.

 

The current DCA have been vague saying payment was made in July 2014 but haven't given any details of what, how much etc, and the only think I can think of is the £1 CCA payment I have made to the then DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

name names please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi all,

 

After going back and forth with the DCA with prove it letters and saying that it is SB, the DCA didn't provide any proof but said that they received a letter from the card issuing bank that they had received a £1 payment towards the account. Please note they said "towards the account" and not "toward the debt".

 

I replied again and told them that it is SB and no payment or acknowledgement was made to towards debt in the last six years and asked for the banks letter (which hasn't been provided). I did not however clarify that the £1 was paid requesting CCA (within the last 6 years) as I thought this could somehow weaken my case.

 

However now they have issued a claim though Court. To begin with I have acknowledged the claim stating I will be defending the full claim and have 28 days to file my defense. I will start preparing my defense would need your guidance/help.

 

To begin with I contacted a debt charity who advised that asking for CCA (irrespective of the £1 fee payment) would be classed as acknowledgement! I was surprised and asked if they have any Court case examples of it and was advised they haven't seen any but it is their view and asking CCA means acknowledgement.

 

Is this true? Has any one come across a DCA succesfully arguing in court that a CCA request/£1 fee payment is acknowledgement and winning the case?

 

Thanks in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial legal Issues.

 

 

If you would read the following link then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are wrong again = the £1.00 fee is a statuary fees required for copy of an alledged enforceable CCA1974 and does not count - which debt charity? hence we say to write on postal order etc for statuary use only, meantime get your defence going but submit the day before it is due to be submitted as then they have no time to mess about and trash your defence,

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. It was National Debtline. I will draft my defence and post it here for advise.

 

Just another question. When I had requested for the CCA they did provide me with a copy. Now SB being absolute defence, would you suggest scrutinizing the enforceablility of the CCA itself and if not enforceable add this as well along with SB to the defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't mix anything with SB

 

 

get that link sorted

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Howard Cohen Solicitors

 

Date of issue – – 08/02/17.

I have already acknowledged the claim with intention to fully defend

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.This claim is for the sum of £6250 in respect of monies owning under an Agreement with the account number XXX pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA).

The debt was legally assigned by Nationwide to the Claimant and notice has been served.

2.The Defendant failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the Agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA.

3.The Claimant claims,

1. The sum of £6250

2. Interest pursuant to s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 percent from XXX to the date hereof of XXX days is the sum of £2700

3. Future interest and costs

 

Amount claimed: 6250+2700+court fees/legal costs= £9450

 

What is the value of the claim? £9450

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It is the debt purchaser.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Probably I did get a letter of assignment but can't remember exactly.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Probably I did get a Default Notice but can't remember exactly.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant at the time and without a job was facing financial hardship

 

What was the date of your last payment? Circa June 2009

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? No

 

What you need to do now.

 

Answer the questions above. As above in red

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA Requesticon to the claimant for a copy of your agreement

(except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts) I had done so previously and have a been provided with a scanned copy

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts. I shall sent the CPR31.14 request relation to Credit cards. I understand I should not wait for the claimant to respond to my request before filing my defence with 28 days?

 

Please let me know if you require any other information

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to hide names [other than pers info]

who was the original creditor please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the crux is this supposed statement of payment in 2014?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and that was the £1 for your CCA request that you made at the time?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well IMHO id be filing the SB defence then.

await and see what andyorch and others think.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...