Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, Hotpoint UK has been a subsidiary of Whirlpool for over 20 years. And unlike some domestic goods manufacturers you can buy from them direct and I believe they employ their own service engineers, Is that your situation? You bought direct from Hotpoint and Hotpoint sent out their own engineer?
    • It's Hotpoint (but I believe they're part of the Whirlpool group now?). The part was bought direct from them as a consumer.
    • Thanks BankFodder for your latest, I'm in complete agreement on the subject of mediation and will be choosing to decline mediation, the longer timeline is not an issue for me, I will happily let the going to court run it's course. I really appreciate the support from the Consumer Action Group. I'll post the email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response. Regards, J    email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response:  
    • Sec127 (3) repealed, now gone. S. 127(3)-(5) repealed (6.4.2007) by Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c. 14), ss. {15}, 70, 71(2), {Sch. 4} (with Sch. 3 para. 11); S.I. 2007/123, art. 3(2), Sch. 2
    • We used to recommend that people accept mediation but our advice has changed. The mediation process is unclear. Before you can embark on it you have to agree that you are prepared to enter a compromise – and that means that you agree that you are prepared to give up some of your rights even though you are completely in the right and you are entitled to hundred percent of your money and even though EVRi are simply trying to obstruct you in order to discourage you and also to put others who might want to follow your example off from claiming and even though they have a legitimate basis for reimbursement. Mediation is not transparent. In addition to having to sign up that you are prepared to give up some of your rights, you will also have to agree not to reveal any details of the mediation – including the result of the mediation – so that the whole thing is kept secret. This is not open justice. Mediation has nothing to do with justice. The only way of getting justice is to make sure that this matter goes to trial unless EVRi or the other parcel delivery companies put their hands up and accept the responsibility even if they do it is a gesture of goodwill. Going to trial and winning at trial produces a judgement which we can then add to our small collection to assist other people who are in a similar boat. EVRi had been leading you around by the nose since at least January – and probably last year as well – and their whole purpose is simply to drag it out, to place obstacles in your way, to deter other people, and to make you wish that you'd never started the process and that you are prepared to give up your 300 quid. You shouldn't stand for it. You should take control. EVRi would prefer that you went to mediation and if nothing else that is one excellent reason why you should decline mediation and go to court. If it's good for them it's bad for you. On mediation form, you should sign that you are not prepared to compromise and that you are not prepared to keep the result secret but that you want to share the results with other people in similar circumstances. This means that the mediation won't go ahead. It will take slightly longer and you will have to pay a court fee but you will get that back when you win and you will have much greater satisfaction. Also, once you go the whole process, you will learn even more about bringing a small claim in the County Court so that if this kind of thing happens again you will know what to do and you will go ahead without any hesitation. Finally, if you call EVRi's bluff and refuse mediation and go to trial, there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but there is a chance that they will agree to pay out your claim before trial simply in order to avoid a judgement. Another judgement against them will simply hurt the position even more and they really don't want this. 300 quid plus your costs is peanuts to them. They don't care about it. They will set it off against tax so the taxpayer will make their contribution. It's all about maintaining their business model of not being liable for anything, and limiting or excluding liability contrary to section 57 and section 72 of the consumer rights act.     And incidentally, there is a myth that if you refuse mediation that somehow it will go against you and the judge will take a dim view and be critical of you. This is precisely a myth. It's not true. It would be highly improper if any judge decided the case against you on anything other than the facts and the law of the case. So don't worry about that. The downside of declining mediation is that your case will take slightly longer. The upside is that if you win you will get all your money and you will have a judgement in your favour which will help others. The chances of you winning in this case are better than 95% and of course you would then receive 100% of your claim plus costs
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys massive advice needed.

 

I'll try and get to the point but this is so complex you would not believe.

 

Split up from wife in Jan 14 moved out she stayed in house due to the 2 kids.

Morgage solely in my name.

 

Went on credit report Nov 15 due to not being able to get a overdraft credit card or add a tablet to phone contract.

Couldn't access it for weeks due to many factors one my own fault did no realise I wasn't on electoral roll.

 

When I did get on it there was quite a bit of debt

not a huge amount but things I knew nothing of.

Signature forged etc.

 

One debt ended up in a CCJ, but I went to court and had it set aside.

I have not reported her for fraud due to the kids.

 

Lots of credit searches in her name to payday loan company's

many to a company called welcome finance.

 

Who had been calling me about a debt for a few months prior about a joint account .

Yet every time I went down local office when I found out where it was

no one would speak to me due to data protection.

There is nothing on experian tying me in with this debt no default, no loan account

 

Due to CCJ I contacted land registry to see if anything there

and a legal charge secured loan to progressive finance 2006 again not clue how.

 

Do some digging and welcome and progressive same company

. I email them for more info.

They tell me it's down to a secured loan I took out in 2008?

But the charge says 2006

 

I asked for further information on this? Such as a credit agreement.

As I have had no dealings with your company.

Other than a few phone calls regarding payments

 

when I went down to the local office in Merthyr and returned phone calls asking for more information

no one would speak to me regarding it or provide what I asked for.

I requested a CCA which the returned po and asked for my signature

 

I did not sign and told them they gave sent information before so I have no need to prove who I am

 

they emailed a credit agreement dated 2008 which looks like my signature

but you can barely make figures out.

 

After the 12 + 2 days were up.

I head office they were now in default and they had not provided me with what I'd requested

 

. I then received a sar.

I had a default notice asking for arrears from local office

, they were sent a debt dispute letter.

 

I had thank you for being a good customer

and local branch were moving in April 2016 heard nothing since

 

I look through sar there are blank pieces of paper with my signature on there are loans

some look like they are my signature some definitely aren't mine.

 

almost all have her and my signature loans are from 2001 to 2008

the last loan was for 30 grand and 39 grand interest on top 300 months?

 

There are call logs saying mr called in

was not me phone calls again not me

 

. But the handful of times I did ring or go down to get answers nothing logged

. Am bank statement in this sar are ex wife's.

 

There are some of my bank details for direct debits

I've checked my bank there were many payments to welcome.

No dockets of mine in there or proof of my wages at all.

 

There a piece of paper saying legal charge 2008 but it hasn't been registered with land registry.

 

There are statements and I have to admit when I left in 2014 I paid money to this company as she worked out who would paid what.

Stupid not to question but my head was in shed when I left. .

 

I have calculated that £20.6026 has been paid to loan since 2008

balance on then was £30,514.26 and still stood at £25,384.31 in July 15

 

no payments since jun 2015 cos I had already wised up by then

and thought why am I paying a debt that's hers.

 

The loan before this in 2006 you can't read figures on the fixed loan sum agreement

it looks like £429 a month.

 

on the contract and legal charge agreement it says £129.39 180 months

they all look like re writes but not all are that readable.

Plus they have overinflated house price in 2003.

Is this loan legal enforceable?

 

What can I do? Help??

Still haven't heard a pip out of welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So what is your actual problem?

You say there is no charge showing

And

Your CRA file is clear too

 

So......

Just the fact that you owe them?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is my name looks like it's all over it.

 

I have had no dealings with this company until last year.

 

A charge in 2006 for one loan but the loan is 2008 is not registered with land registry.

 

I don't know what to do as regards to this loan I knew nothing about

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK still trying to understand what you are writing

Its not too clearly explained

 

So there is a charge showing from 2006 against the home

 

I suggest since then everything has been refinanced lots of times??

 

So you want the charge gone?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like charge gone and there was only one loan after this it was taken out in 2008 (not by me) gone

and I'm unsure as to which steps to take on this.

 

I must add that I have paid off other debt that my ex wife took out.

 

But I am in no position financially to pay this off if they do come after me

Edited by cruzhughes
Needed to add more
Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect each and every loan has

ppi

numerous insurances on each one

and probably MIF too?

 

all of those are reclaimable at their int rate.

 

any chance you can scan each agreement up?

one multipage PDF document please only.

follow the upload guide

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not every loan since 2001 has Ppi

it totals around £14k

only one has Mif on.

 

Some medi care and some charges

 

I have spoke to fscs and I am waiting a pack in post.

 

I haven't admitted debt

but what my thoughts are here I that could be claimed back would it sort debt

I will try but not sure if you will read it cos it's very small

 

On iPad so don't think poss

 

Off to work now.

 

Will try later or in the morning

 

do you want every agreement from 2001 or the last 2

 

Think I've done them anything further you need to know just ask

 

08 loan.

 

More PDFs

 

Don't know how much the charge is for

 

land registry couldn't give me that info

and said to speak to progressive finance and

 

when I queried with welcome they said it cos of secured I took out in 2008.

 

I've posted all agreements( could you view them)

 

there are 2 other loans with Ppi on in sar 2001 and 2003

but no agreement to match

only loan history financial statement

 

The only statements in sar are from 2008 to 2015

.but i do loan history statements from 2001

 

Are these what you want? These are the first ones from 2001 I have lots more so will take a while

 

Fab thanks so much I'm uploading the last of the old loans and I'll update the loan 08 that's still outstanding in new thread. I've cropped loads cos it's more paper than info

 

Last loan in 2008 this is the one I calculated around 20 grand has been paid off

try 2.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
pdf's merged to one file - dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

post every agreement up and statements if you have them.

 

the PPI would have rolled over certainly to the secured loan from the refinanced one into it.

 

how much is the charge for?

 

yep brill keep going

then when you are finished ill sort all the docs out

 

keep to one thread for now please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing yet too busy at present

you are second in the queue

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you redo pages 3+4 of this PDF

take clearer photos please

 

I cant complete the story without seeing the un rdacted bits

I need to see the full sheet of each statement and the numbers / accounts they refer too.

side/bottom numbers

if I send you via PM a secure email ad

can you send them all to me?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you done

this is going to be interesting

I've spotted a few things already

but dates on agreements and clear scans of those are needed too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post the unredacted stuff via email not up here please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping you can make more sense of it than me

 

 

I've had it all since April when I disputed debt and then asked for a cca

they didn't comply

I then wrote back saying they were in default of my request and received the sar!! :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

its complex yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

working on a very complex situation

you are not forgotten.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

one thing that's becoming evidently clear...

 

there are SOOO so many agreements chaining together..

 

the overriding conclusion i'm coming too

is that through all their insurances over all the agreements..

Homecare

lifecare

PPI

MIF

 

that the total of all of those under a reclaim will far far exceed whatever you owe..

 

before I delve further

can we just confirm

there is no charge showing anywhere against any property?

and there are no accounts left on your credit file?

 

and its imply the worry that one day they might come after what they think you owe?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only charge on my property that is registered with land registry in is 2006 is with progressive finance not the newest loan in 2008.

 

The first time I accessed my credit file was Nov 2015 and there was nothing on there to do with welcome finance

no searches and no outstanding loan in my name. Which is rather bizarre when I paid last payment in May 2015.

 

However my ex wife was associated with me on there and they had clearly done searches on her.

Want me to upload this info? .

I disassociated her. And nothing now mentioning them at all.

There's has been no change on that either.

I am still waiting for a pack off fscs.

 

 

How shall I proceed?

Yes I'm worried sick about it all.

But have not heard a pip since April after I sent a debt dispute letter and requested a CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...