Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1693 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

good I'm glad I wasn't having a mental lapse.

 

so now you can complain to the FOS that the new owner is refusing to carry out an IRL investigation

ref you old case number

 

should be interesting...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just a thought i is it true the FOS don’t deal with complaints that have been subject to legal action?

 

The repossession was a legal action but what about the IR compliant will it be dealt with as a separate issue?

 

I’m going through things that I need to be sending them and they all mention court action due to repossession.

 

So I’m just wondering where I stand here

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s the 30th tomorrow so that’s d day for an arrangement to be in place by. I haven’t made one. So initial payment is due anytime as nothing in place. I wonder if excel will be paying me another visit next week..

 

Not received any statement or requests for payment.

 

Fos complaint done last week. Waiting game now here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fos have replied. Sent me a Ppi form to fill in against welcome for some unknown reason. Explained the Ppi aspect was sorted by fscs. And that that is irresponsible lending claim against new owners as any balance is due to all penalty fees and the IR. explained all this on the complaint form last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it MIGHT snow on Christmas day too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not very good news with the FOS regarding the IR complaint here’s the email I’ve just received

 

Thank you for your email.

 

It doesn’t look like Prime Credit or Alpha Credit are businesses registered with the FCA. That being the case it doesn’t look like we can consider a complaint against either of these businesses.

 

As you know, we have previously told you why we cannot consider a complaint against Welcome.

 

If you wish to respond, please ensure you respond to our [email protected] address.

 

Where and what now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no not unregulated

 

not businesses registered with the FCA

 

then how can they litigate at all?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there an FCA number on the footer of any letters from prime/alpha etc?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. But I’ve just come home to another letter from prime dates the day before solicitors letter. Look right at the bottom.

Your loan is administered by acenden on behalf of creditor acenden is authorised and regulated by FCA

 

What are you getting at here dx

Prime 11th Dec.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

now why didn't we spot that before

 

time to start an FOS complaint against acenden then.

they are registered.

 

as far as i'm aware

I could be wrong

but me thinks whomever is taking you to court must by registered with the FCA to carry out financial things in the UK?

 

andy if you see this

your thoughts?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok what if I do a direct email back to the fos from the one I’ve just received explaining that acenden are the ones administering and to take everything I’ve put to them against Prime aim at acenden.

 

That may save time starting from scratch with the Fos. They already have everything re prime complaint

 

I did mention to you before that they were same address I found it on google

Link to post
Share on other sites

why not

point to what you have discovered.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go

 

Found this link online https://primecredit.webcustomerportal.com/welcome/primecredit. Have a guess what company administers my Morgage

 

why not

point to what you have discovered.

 

Email will go to Fos this weekend

 

Also to clairfy on court docs only prime/alpha are named on them not acenden

 

Any advice or help from Andy dx??

 

Going to send this to Fos. Is it ok??

 

I have just found this out it’s on the footer of every correspondence from Prime you also l have copies of these.

 

Your loan is administered by acenden on behalf of creditor Prime Credit 5 S.à.r.l. or Alpha Credit Solutions 4 S.a.r.l.

 

Acenden limited is authorised and regulated by FCA. And covered by FOS.

 

https://primecredit.webcustomerportal.com/welcome/primecredit

 

Am wondering could you help now? And continue this complaint with Acenden?

 

Every letter I’ve sent has been addressed to prime but it’s exactly same address as Acenden.

Link to post
Share on other sites

certainly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my thoughts run with i'd let a judge decide that...IF it ever got that far.

 

as acenden are operating for 'their overseas client' I expet they'll know pretty quickly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

andy you seen this

they've issued a notice of restored hearing

are companies not registered in this conntry allowed to do this?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any updates from Andy regarding this Dx?

 

What am I to prepare and have I got to send anyone anything.

 

Just had reply from FOS

Thank you for your email.

 

I have looked into complaining against Acenden as well as Prime Credit and Alpha Credit and even though they are regulated by the FCA and the Financial Ombudsman Service, they became regulated after you took out the loan with them in 2001. It is on this basis that we can’t bring your complaint against the business as it is out of jurisdiction.

 

I know that this is frustrating but if there are any other documents relating to your complaint that include other companies, please send those documents to us and we can look into bringing your complaint against them.

 

If you have any questions please get in touch with us.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...