There is no counterclaim at present

a part 36.6 is a offer to settle

this may be their adr

the offer would not come unless the manufacturer was in loop,

a part 20 would join in the big guns

what may effect their reputation

and i must be fair they do have a good reputation

however the retailer has much adverse,

took to court TS ,

bad press

daily mail lots of bad reviews

the list goes on and

they have been leaned on by the drat and punished disabled people

the dirts all out their

me would love to type this in for all to google

then ya see me not speak with fork tongue yea man

"We are offering ADR" is not a valid Part 36 offer.

CPR r36 lays out strict formalities for an offer to comprise a Part 36 offer.

Meanwhile, OP : slow up.

You keep conflating different issues, and as a result your posts come across in a way that confuses people. Stick to one issue at a time, be that Part 36, Part 20, or what you believe is the conspiracy against your postings........

Is there a reason you have not named the retailer to which you refer?

What's the problem with informing TS?

What;s the blast you speak of?

How could i name the retailer with a live case in progress

Citizens advice/trading standards recorded complaint july 2013

Trading standards local signed for documents last week

retailer/manufacturer,certification body all the other non parties not yet aware will be on 18.7.2017

Back at case management soon where it was likely a Single joint expert witness would be ordered plus other directions.

Defendant was asked to file some other docs before hearing

in that bundle they requested more time for manufacturer to respond and in this bundle they also stated it would allow a window for ADR/MEDIATION during 15 months

this flag has never been waved till now.

About the posts

i am not having a pop at this forum it is not connected to the industry,

as i said the ones that are remove the postings even when you tap dance around the issue.

Another point very easy to give bias spin to all it may be all lies,look at the lingo i use where would a grunt get this from.

Any one taking the kings shilling from TS knows these statements are bang on.

If there is a proven safety issue

i have won the case and also there are enough clues in the posts to guess the product then you would no some of the players involved i can not

state this.

Right, it's a big company? you feel vulnerable. Reading your posts there's movement in the process and hopefully soon you will have recompense and the company will be scrutinised to make sure safety issues are dealt with.

Ok part warm the industry is all about party jellie,

in the early days me thought with my stupid mentality i could boo em off

they would back down

in my previous lives i have put sum on notice of high court that worked,

these crews it did not and

i understand the comments to the factory revved em up like got advice take bar out of factory u produce beta gear and

mine looks good from 500 mtrs,

the sad part about this the true claimant is a protected party and been deprived use 5 years.

That why me said in this industry ,golf,hand shake ,closing ranks and all that jazz

but me the legal anti grunt with pointy ears when the manufacturer Md as his running shoes on thats a laff .

When the manufacturers generals say we are very sorry

got the lettos 5 years later

not sorted

cant use the scrap

its not a washing machine

this is to the death yea man

Is there an interpreter who can clarify the OP's posts?

I'm lost as to what they are trying to say ........

mine looks good from 500 mtrs,the sad part about this the true claimant is a protected party and been deprived use 5 years.

I would like clarification of this sentence

aah is this how you feel, your case looks good but you're not convinced, if not correct me. The next question is what does 'the true claimant is a protected party' mean. Is that still how you feel as not to expose more of who you are claiming against.

If something is wrong in life, keep calm and carry on.

If you know the law there is nothing to clarify

if yow doe it is well above your station

read the previous quotes

get a feel for how complex this is,

soon me will find out if the big cheque book crew are on board as me say telephone numbers.

Some people walk the walk

some walk the walk and talk the talk

the beak said time r u off your ed do you know what u r getting into

me said to the beak

no me not off me ed

but out mybrains

this was not received very well ,

this is not messers court

i have to create a different ATE

how else could i trade against big guns

i only have a small gun but alot of bottle

Think its time you had a nap Jackthemondoe

Andy