Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Finance U aka Corner Park Garage - claim form***Claim Dismissed***


RCT40
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This was dismised due to the Bill of Sale issue

 

Can the Claimant instigate another claim??

 

Now CPR 38.7 Prohibits a new claim on the same particulars but a second bite at the apple without the Bill of Sale and simply on the Consumer Credit Act??

 

And finally if the Car was repo on a dodgy Bill of Sale, can a debtor then sue Finance U or the creditor for breach of contract with an unlawful repo??

 

Thanks for the questions and observations.

 

Unless the claimant tries it on again, I'm not going to push this one any further. This has dragged on since January 2013, caused me a lot of stress for a longtime and I'm pretty weary with it all.

 

Whilst the Bill of Sale was ineffective not being registered on time, this is becuase the claimant tampered with the dates of the agreement, we signed on 31/3/2012, but the agreements were changed to be 6th April 2012. We also didn't get any copies of the agreements until October 2013 despite three letter informing that we've never received any agreements since signing them. I'm fairly convinced at this stage after watching the judge wipe the floor with him in this area that he won't be brining this one back - however stranger things have happened I suppose, and I'll cross that bridge if and when I come to it.

 

It did take him three years to issue this claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Although it's been mega stressful, especially coming up with firm proof dates were changed, which resulted in an information request to DVLA for acquisition date of the vehicle and road tax information to prove dates were changed,

 

I would say to anyone fighting these people,

don't ever roll over,

 

give them enough rope they'll hang themselves

- this guy is in his 70s, doesn't use solicitors LiP and doesn't appear to have a clue what he's going on about

- says the first thing that comes into his head,

 

 

like he gave me a BMW to drive away a week before I signed an agreement to finance it

- as if that would happen lol.

 

 

They also forget the documents given to you under SAR for example, and issue changed ones to suit their situation.

 

 

This happened here

I was given some diary notes under SAR last year,

and after a heated discussion in the waiting area at the prelim

he issued an updated version to suit

- but that fell to bits when I added to my evidence the notes that I held because these new entries would have also existed on my copy.

 

I'd be happy to chat with anyone in similar situations with these people and provide any assistance from my experiences.

 

Also to anyone having trouble getting credit,

this is similar to doing a deal with the devil and should be avoided at all costs

- public transport would be a less stressful option than having a car from this lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done RCT

 

Never thought the counter claim would

be a runner due to the issues surrounding

handing the car back

 

Would def send full report to the FCA

 

May be worth considering formal complaint

regarding loss of use of the car

You never know the FOS may agree

costs nothing

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wonder if I could get some advice please,

 

after the court hearing,

I applied via Equifax to have the Finance U entry removed from my credit file.

 

Equifax contacted Finance U who have refused to remove the entry from my credit file,

 

is there anyway of making them remove it?

 

Thanks for any help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, There is no default recorded on my credit file, as in there was never a default notice sent to me, and not recorded on my file.

 

The account balance is wrong,

the monthly payment is wrong,

and it racks up another missed payment every month.

 

 

If everything had turned out as it should the account would have ended this time last year.

So does this mean it can just tick on forever?

 

He was told in court that the entries were to be removed, but that's not on the judgement document I recieived.

 

I guess you only avenue is to make a complaint to ICO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you get a transcript?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you get a transcript?

 

I had thought about that dx, but after sending Finance U an email threatening a complaint to ICO and FCA - Equifax have confirmed that the information has been deleted from my credit file today - happy days! :-D

 

Seems that what you need to do is be a bully bully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly sometimes its the only way..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly sometimes its the only way..

 

I don't think you have a choice with Finance U - this guys relies on you giving in - if you fight he goes to pieces in my recent experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...