Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court summons from GREENBELT GROUP ADVICE **Discharged for £400 from +£2k**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi hoping someone can help,

 

Today I received a court summons from Greenbelt group Limited

claiming 9 years worth of maintenance charges for green space land next to my home.

 

I moved into the property in early 2007, had no communication from these people until 2010.

They say that my title deeds state that I am owe them a share of money for the upkeep of grassy areas within my estate

where I live.

 

I have always disputed the charge and never paid them any money at all in the 9 years that I have lived at this address.

 

The green space directly next to my home is in a poor state ruined by the sporting activities from children in the area.

 

Greenbelt group (whom I have never seen on my estate) have not attempted to replace grassy areas and plants ruined by the kids activities thus I feel the charge is unjustified.

 

Would this debt be barred under time limitations?

 

I need to submit a defense and not sure whether to do so under time barred debt

or their failure to provide services that they charge for?

 

Has anyone had any experience with this company?

 

Thanking in advance for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

so what have you received...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?428590-You-have-received-a-Claim-**ISSUED-IN-SCOTLAND**-What-you-need-to-do.

 

and yes they cant lump each year together

so outside of 5 yrs if you are resident & its a scottish court claim - those are extinquished..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou for fast response!

 

Its a small claim, they charge around £200 per year and are claiming 9 years worth from me.

 

The claim

 

1. is about the court having jurisdiction in terms of rule 1 of schedule 8

 

2. Pursuers are proprietors of property benefited in terms of burdens under title of the defenders heritable property at....[MY ADDRESS].... registered in the land register of Scotland under Title number XXXXXXX

 

Between or around March 2007 and March 2015, conform to defenders instruction,

the pursuers supplied the defender with property management and land Maintance services.

 

 

Invoices specifying the services and charges provided to the defender

were sent to the defender on the dates shown in the statement of account supplied herewith.

 

 

The sun outstanding in terms of these services is £XXX.XX which is sum sought.

 

3. The defender has been requested to make payment but has refused or delayed to do so.

 

I wish to defend it,

I have never requested them to do any work at all and if they have been doing any work is certainly not upon my request,

the grass area next to my house is a mess with kids sports and certainly not maintained at all.

 

 

I just wasnt sure what to put in defense? Like i mean if it can be time barred .

not sure how i can write it professional to say that,

 

or do i say that i did not request them to do any work neither verbal or in writing as per their claim in point 2,

attach photos of evidence of poor upkeep of grounds near my house and additionally say that its also time barred?

thank you so much for your advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to look at your deeds, terms, tenency argeement etc etc.

t find out if you are conracted to them to do the work..

 

you cant dispute the 'job' or lack of it they are doing

nor with hold payment 'because' its a mess etc etc.

 

however you most certainly can put them to strict proof that they sent you such invoices

and you are indeed indebted to them through whatever 'agreement'

 

their PoC is very vague

 

look at page 7

box 3

 

easiest way is to scan it

then XXX out what you dont want

 

leave clear or highlight

 

dispute the claim

intend to dispute the claim

 

then add

 

the pursuer is put to strict proof to supply copies of all invoices,

agreements, terms or any other paperwork they intend to rely upon

to enable a suitable defence, if necessary, to be entered by the defendant.

it is averred that part of the claim are statute barred under scottish Law

being outside of 5yrs and are thus extinquished

 

scan up their paperwork please

redact it all

and pop it ALl in ONE multipage word doc

as a PDF

follow the upload guide.

 

what is the return day please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much. I need to look out my title deeds and have a look at exactly what it says there.

 

I received a threatening letter from them a few years ago but found a self help group page dedicated to this company by a home owner (cant seem to find that now) but he was challenging and encouraging others to challenge their activities something about unfair competition in the clause of the deeds?

 

My Return day is 20th May

 

I will go see if I can scan this claim just now, thank you so much

 

Hopefully this upload works ok

 

thank you so much

statement of claim.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so plenty of time then

dont take what i am saying and doing as 100% correct

i'm not that good on legal stuff.

 

 

others will advise too

if i've got things wrong.

 

 

FWIW: thats a std statement ofclaim

with just std blanks filled in.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they claim theyve sent invoices ? Did you get them ?

 

I would of though any invoice thats overs 5 years old is Statute Barred and not payable (there may be reasons for disputing the rest). But you dont mention this in your Defence reply ?

 

I assume Scottish courts have ability to strike out/summary judgment ?. If so you could use that to selectively strike out claims over 5 years old, if same as English system you could claim costs as its pre-allocation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou all so much for the advice!.

 

 

im just not sure what to put in my defence because I don't want to get it completely wrong.

They have not attached any invoices to the statement of claim

they have only attached a summery statement with the 9 years worth of dates/fees for the year plus non payment fees.

 

 

There are around 300 houses on my estate so looks like they sending bills out of around 60k per year for this housing developments "maintenance of grass areas".

 

 

Im not sure how many of the neighbors pay though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is beginning to sound like a bit of spoofing exercise going on here

can you detail what their figures are [money wise]

 

 

time to go ask a few other neighbours if they've know anything

 

 

300 homes X say even £100 a year is £30k in their pocket

and you say for doing much to nothing too!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this year the charge is £181.85 - the yearly charge over the past 9 years has varied between £165.14 and £205.84 but there is no invoice with any break down to justify what the cost is actually for, they just say "maintenance"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If you need to obtain a copy of your deeds please look at this Registers of Scotland link: https://www.ros.gov.uk/services/copy-deeds

 

(Please be aware that there will be a Fee involved to obtain a copy)

 

I also wonder if you are leasehold and Greenbelt are the Property Factors: https://www.greenbelt.co.uk/index.php/homepage/what-s-happening/244-greenbelt-group-is-now-a-registered-property-factor

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I also wonder if you are leasehold and Greenbelt are the Property Factors: https://www.greenbelt.co.uk/index.php/homepage/what-s-happening/244-greenbelt-group-is-now-a-registered-property-factor

 

My property is not leasehold,

the housing developer sold off the grassy area burdens to greenbelt group ltd,

they charge homeowners a fee for alleged upkeep.

 

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12467931.Greenbelt_apos_s_growing_problems/

 

I'm just not sure if I should just dispute on basis of time barred as per dx100uk advice

or if I should enclose photos of the poor maintenance etc as well as being time barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOME of the sum is time barred

 

IMHO for the minute

 

put in as a suggested on the form 7

the rest can be for when you or IF you have to defend the case.

plenty of time to fluff it out.

 

however you have until the 20th so do not rush

let others have their say.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry to be a pain! im not failure with this procedure

 

Should I for now Fill in Box 3 with

 

*I intend to appear in court

*I intend to defend the action

 

Do I send this before I put in my defence statement or do I send it at the same time as the defene statement?

 

Sorry to ask so many questions I just dont want to get this wrong

 

thank your for all your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

look at my example in post 5.

 

no rush you have until the 20th

 

you do NOT need to file a defence yet.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Im starting to panic now....

 

I have read my deeds - a little complicated but yes it seems I am required to pay a share of upkeep of grass areas, I am so worried that I haven't sent back these forms yet

 

I want to do this asap, can I please just check that this is right before I submit it:

 

I Fill in Box 3 with

 

*I intend to appear in court or be represented on the calling date

*I intend to defend the action

 

*I attach a note of proposed defence /counterclaim

 

The pursuer is put to strict proof to supply copies of all invoices,

agreements, terms or any other paperwork they intend to rely upon

to enable a suitable defence, if necessary, to be entered by the defendant.

 

it is averred that part of the claim are statute barred under Scottish Law

being outside of 5yrs and are thus extinguished.

 

thank you so much for help

Link to post
Share on other sites

*I attach a note of proposed defence /counterclaim not yet

it is averred that part of the claim is statute barred under Scottish Law

being outside of 5yrs and are thus extinguished.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry dx100uk I feel like im being totally stupid...

 

 

*I intend to appear in court or be represented on the calling date

*I intend to defend the action

 

ok got that bit

 

but when and where do i put this bit below? - I though that was the defence?

The pursuer is put to strict proof to supply copies of all invoices,

agreements, terms or any other paperwork they intend to rely upon

to enable a suitable defence, if necessary, to be entered by the defendant.

 

it is averred that part of the claim are statute barred under Scottish Law

being outside of 5yrs and are thus extinguished.

 

im sorry Im new to all of this thank you so much for all your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 5 attachment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, So i filled in exactly as attachment

 

*I intend to appear in court or be represented on the calling date

*I intend to defend the action

 

The pursuer is put to strict proof to supply copies of all invoices,

agreements, terms or any other paperwork they intend to rely upon

to enable a suitable defence, if necessary, to be entered by the defendant.

 

I submit this to the court by the return day.......

Will they reply to me or do I just turn up to court

and then the judge will ask them to provide the evidence for above?

 

at what point do I state the defence of:

 

it is averred that part of the claim is statute barred under Scottish Law

being outside of 5yrs and are thus extinguished.

 

Im sorry for the inconvenience, please be assured that I will be making a donation to the site for all your help, which I appreciate very much!

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a inconvenience at all jennyanydots ...please post if you are unsure of any aspect of the process.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are your comms with your neighbours like?

are you aware if anyone else has gotten such claims???

you might find helping them helps you...

 

there are a couple of things that prick my mind here..........

 

firstly, general info...

yes you MUST attend on the day specified.

 

Scottish courts are somewhat more relaxed, for want of 'an' comparison to England.

to that end...you stick to what you have stated if asked anything at all.

 

if you WANT to add anything verbally

then you could intimate that you have never in all the years they claim you owe

you have NEVER received any invoices to your address

 

you could also intimate along the lines of

well some of these supposed invoices are outside of 5 yrs

so are time bared.

 

but play it by ear.

....

the sheriff will indicate your next hearing date

but order the pursuer to comply with you evidence request.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, Thank you,

 

I had a look at SCHEDULE 2 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973

(Appropriate Dates for Certain Obligations for Purposes of Section 6)

which in my circumstances i think may not help me....

what are your thoughts?

 

I need to drop the reply tonight so court gets it tomorrow.

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

well leave that bit out then

 

 

it can always be bought up at a hearing if it ever gets that far.

or it your actual defence.

 

 

what part of schedule 2 worries you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...