Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Rossendales have been given our debt unfairly, what can we do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am completely new to this so please bear with me.

 

Firstly the brief back ground-

 

I met my (now) wife back in 2010,

she had previously thrown her violent alcoholic ex out after he assaulted one of the children,

whilst they had been together a matter of years he had favoured drink over paying the bills when given bill money,

so things like council tax didn't get paid,

 

he walked scott free and we have been gradually clearing the debts since we met

and were finally getting close to seeing some sun light, or so we thought.

 

last year I went self employed part time along side doing a college diploma and caring for our disabled son,

my wife was just finishing a degree and was pregnant

 

we supplied all our income to Boston borough council who decided to impose a "fictitious figure" of £1000 a week income (I wish), thus stopping all our council tax support,

 

I cancelled the direct debit whilst they sorted it out as they were trying to take more than they were entitled to

and far more than we could afford,

 

but as I did not want to get into trouble I made manual payments by card each month

keeping us to the agreement for the arrears.

 

Once the council tax support had been set up with the correct income I rang up and set up the direct debit,

it was agreed that they would take £19 a month for this years bill and £20 a month for the arrears,

it was agreed that this would be taken (£39 a month) starting on the 12th of April,

this I thought would be the end of it and I would just need to make sure the money was in the account available,

boy was I wrong.

 

Instead of setting up the direct debit they passed the debt straight to Rossendales

who have added £75 to the 3 outstanding years bills (totalling £225)

with the threat of 3 x £235 if we haven't settled or made an arrangement by the 6th of may

to clear the entire (now just under £1500),

 

4 years ago we owed over £2200 just for this arrears

not to mention the other debts we have cleared either fully or up to this point are clearing

this council tax arrears was down to around £1200, its like a massive kick in the teeth.

 

Surely the council cant just hand over the debt to these people after I had made an agreement with them,

I didn't even realise they hadn't set up the direct debit until we received these 3 letters today

and I checked the bank to find the money still sat in the account,

 

if there was a problem with the bank the council didn't even contact to say they hadn't been able to collect

or I would have paid it by card and enquired with the bank what the problem was.

 

Surely it also can't be legal for Rossendales to impose charges like this, one lot I might have been able to deal with but three lots each time is going to force us to declare bankruptcy!

 

I am sorry if it has been a bit long winded but I wanted to give as much detail as I thought might help,

I am worried sick, me and my wife aren't even talking at the moment as she feels its all her fault

and wants to sell everything she owns in the hope that it will raise enough cash to make a reasonable offer

(but I can only see Rossendales taking what she raises and wiping it out with fee's getting us no where)

causing a massive argument,

 

we have a six month old baby as well as 3 older children and were looking forward to her first proper Christmas,

now I fear I may have to tell the children we can't afford to get them any thing this year,

not to mention if the bailiffs attend and decide that their games consoles and tv's can be taken towards the debt

 

I feel so helpless and hate it has caused so much friction between me and my wife

as we both just want to sort it out,

I could even understand it if we hadn't been paying but we have.

 

Please can any one help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

contact the coucil

find out why they've not requested payment

ask why they never took it

they might take it all back and drop the fees.

 

 

whilst with them.

get these questions answered.

 

 

You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

 

 

.................

 

 

on the bailiffs front

you DO NOT have to let them in

 

 

just be aware they can levy on cars etc

so might be an idea if they are owned by yourselves and not on finanace

to either lock them in a garage out of sight

 

 

or park them a few streets away.

 

 

more help will come in the morning

for now there is little more you can do

go get some sleep

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, wish I could sleep, according to rossendales letters the orders are 16/02/2009 for £499.15, 22/06/2009 for £492 and 20/07/2009 for 261.00 all for previouse address in my wife's name, I take it being married that they can take my car even though its our only means of transport and I care for my disabled son and since January, also my elderly disabled father?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a Blue Badge for your son or father - if so make sure it is on show in the vehicle. If all is correct then Rossendales may charge 3 x £75 but only 1 x £235 if they are enforcing all the debts together. In your position I would be contacting my local Councillor(s) to act on your behalf as it looks as if something has gone more than a little wrong.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, wish I could sleep, according to rossendales letters the orders are 16/02/2009 for £499.15, 22/06/2009 for £492 and 20/07/2009 for 261.00 all for previouse address in my wife's name, I take it being married that they can take my car even though its our only means of transport and I care for my disabled son and since January, also my elderly disabled father?

 

I can understand your concerns but can I please assure you that whilst Rossendales can indeed charge a separate Compliance Fee of £75 for each account, then cannot and must not, charge multiple enforcement fees of £235.

 

The advice already given of speaking with the council is correct. If it is the case that the council will not do anything, then it is vital that you set up a payment arrangement by the date given on the Notice of Enforcement. This is referred to as the 'Compliance stage'. During this period a repayment proposal can be set up and the fees will not rise. If you fail to set up a payment arrangement by the date given, then the debt passes to an individual enforcement agent and this will involve a personal visit.

 

Please post back once you have spoken with the council.

 

Lastly, what is the date given on the Notice of Enforcement by which payment or a payment arrangement must be made by?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ever so much for your help, I have just spoken to council, apparently they sent a letter (which never arrived) dated 30/03/16 to inform me that there had been a problem with the direct debit set up, the woman then said that it should not have been sent off so quick as the first dd was not due until 12/04/16.

 

As I explained to her if I had known there was a problem with my bank then I would have paid by card whilst I sorted it as the money was there, even she gave the impression that the way it had been dealt with was harsh and set the direct debit up, said she would contact the bailiffs strait away to have it bought back on the basis that it had been sent to the bailiffs in error and the charges will be removed and also send out written confirmation. I paid £50 by card to cover the missing payment and increased the arrangement to £50 p/m to try to get it paid off sooner (I would rather go with out than have this threat hanging over us again).

 

Me and my wife both feel like a massive weight has been lifted.

 

I would like to end by stating that I think the amount bailiffs can charge is criminal, if you have had your debt passed to the bailiffs because you just couldn't be bothered to pay your bill then fair enough, however if like us and many others you have been struggling and doing your best to clear it then theses types of charges will just make sure your debt becomes impossible and the stress is emotional abuse, if you are struggling to pay £20, £50 p/m then how can adding £75 for a letter followed by £235 if you cant make an agreement that satisfies the bailiffs?

 

sorry rant over, just glad its sorted and really thankful for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that a massive WELL DONE needs to be given to Boston Borough Council. They have used their discretion wisely.

 

Well done to you as well by plucking up the courage to speak with the council.

 

The point that you have raised about the bailiff fees is a common one although I would like to add, that since the new(ish) regulations came into effect in 2014, it is the case that an astonishing number of people now pay their debt by way of a payment arrangement during the 'compliance stage' and therefore avoid the enforcement fee of £235 altogether.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that a massive WELL DONE needs to be given to Boston Borough Council. They have used their discretion wisely.

 

Well done to you as well by plucking up the courage to speak with the council.

 

 

I can only echo that said above as it does seem unusual for a Council to use common sense in this day & age. Could it be because they use their own staff instead of having hived it off to the likes of Couldn't Careless Capita?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...