Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You could also ask about Jeremy Hunt and the multiple flats purchase he didn't declare properly. Or Lord Ashcroft about how much tax he saved while he was a non-dom. According to Private Eye, in Ashcroft's book he says Rayner avoided paying £3,500 to HMRC. Meanwhile he's estimated to have saved £112m by being a non-dom between 2000 and 2010.
    • Can you still log into your account and see if it will accept a defence ?
    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide Partnership mortgage


123fat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please is there anyone out there that has taken the NHS partnership mortgage with Nationwide.

Who has either taken them to court and won or lost their case. Would be great to connect with someone who has been dealing with them regarding the equity share as we are at the moment .

 

thanks

123fat

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Please is there anyone out there that has taken the NHS partnership mortgage with Nationwide.

Who has either taken them to court and won or lost their case. Would be great to connect with someone who has been dealing with them regarding the equity share as we are at the moment .

 

thanks

123fat

 

Hi 123fat,

I am in the middle of trying to get Nationwide off my back and get my house from them. I have paid the mortgage, but they are looking for a % of the equity of my house. I too have a partnership mortgage or in my eyes had. I still believe once the mortgage had been paid the partnership should cease. Is this the same with you? Where are you up with them. I would be happy to try and get in touch with as many as possible and look at taking a collective case against them. My mortgage ended in Aug 2014, I had it attached with an endowment policy which did not cover the mortgage, I had a shortfall of 30thousand. Nationwide threatened to take me to court for non payment of the mortgage. I had a double wammy. I had to borrow the shortfall of the endowment and paid it to Nationwide. Then within days they were looking for the % of the equity- 45.5%. I have tried Ombudsman, waste of time and effort.

Do get back to me.

Bonnie Mac

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I would love to take them to court but don`t have the financial means to do so. We were conned into a trap which has only benefited Nationwide.

I feel doomed to stay here forever as I can`t see a way out. May be live in a caravan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kanga65,

Just got your posting today, I posted my bit back in 2016 and am still trying to get rid of Nationwide! Am happy to ring you if want and I can fill you in on "my story".

 

However I do know you may not want to put a number out, so in a nut shell, I had to get both barrister and solicitor on the case and it seems Nationwide have us stitched up!

The recommendation I got was not to go to court. I am now trying to negotiate and am at the early stages. I am not sure what to advise you to do, am happy to give you my contact of legal eagles so you can chat with them.

Bonnie Mac

Link to post
Share on other sites

no off thread comms please

read our rules!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kanga65,

Just got your posting today, I posted my bit back in 2016 and am still trying to get rid of Nationwide! Am happy to ring you if want and I can fill you in on "my story".

 

However I do know you may not want to put a number out, so in a nut shell, I had to get both barrister and solicitor on the case and it seems Nationwide have us stitched up!

The recommendation I got was not to go to court. I am now trying to negotiate and am at the early stages. I am not sure what to advise you to do, am happy to give you my contact of legal eagles so you can chat with them.

Bonnie Mac

Thank you very much. I think the lawyers are probably expensive. It`s a pity the Press doesn`t expose them. It`s not the best way to spend retirement trapped in my flat after spine op and joint replacements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kanga65,

Totally agree. The only thing is if you go with the ones I have been using, they will already be "in the loop" and do not need hours getting their heads around it. They may also be able to help with negotiating. Remember, they still have a hold on your property, well they do on mine. Take care.

Bonnie Mac

Link to post
Share on other sites

please read our rules gentlemen...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kanga65,

I have just emailed my solicitor to see if it is ok with him to put his Firms name on this site, lots of things I am not sure about posting here! so do not want to get anyone into trouble. There is not doubt the legal advice is expensive, but look if he agrees, he will already have the gist of mine and I suspect strongly it is very similar to yours. If he agrees, and to be honest I do not see why not... two cases are better than one. However we will obviously be at different stages so let's just see. I will keep an eye on the blogs.

Take care

Bonnie Mac

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not post the name of your Solicitor here on the open forum...you can PM it to any of the Site Team.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

thank for reply.

 

What does "PM it to the site team mean"? and how do i do this?

 

Is it possible for site team to give me phone number of Kanga65 if she wants too??

 

Or can I put a phone number up here for Kang65 to ring me???

 

I know too many questions........!

 

Bonnie Mac

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Click our username on the left

 

No we cant exchange private numbers

And no you can't post it here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click our username on the left

 

No we cant exchange private numbers

And no you can't post it here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kanga65,

I an not sure how we go about me / you contacting it seems I can not put up a contact number! I am not sure if you have a public phone near you? I know all in my area are gone, I thought that might work ? If you have any ideas or suggestions let me know

Bonnie Mac

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said thru the siteteam we are willing to forward your solicitors details simple click our username on the left

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...