Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Indigo Michael - Safety Net Credit - Clear account PDL Default notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I had a general query I was hoping somebody could help me with.

 

On CheckMyFile .com it states:

 

Notice Of Default

Definition of 'Notice Of Default'

A formal letter from a lender sent when you fall in arrears.

 

 

The notice sets out the arrears and what you have to do to put things right, within 14 days.

 

 

Failure to respond to a notice of default results in a default,

which appears on your credit file for six years,

irrespective of whether you subsequently pay the account in part or in full.

 

The notice is required before creditor (lender) can take any of the following five actions:

terminate the agreement, repossess goods or land, demand earlier payment of sums due

under the agreement, treat as restricted, terminated or deferred any of the debtor’s rights under the agreement and enforce a security.

 

It applies to all types of breach of a regulated agreement, not just default in payment and is only applicable where the creditor intends to take one of the five types of action. A simple reminder not threatening one of these actions is not a Default Notice and not governed by Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Is this an actual rule?

 

 

Must a lender issue a default notice 14 days before issuing a default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us about the debt please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The is debt is Indigo Michael - Safety Net Credit - Clear account when I set it up. £392.00

Date opened 28/01/2014.

 

I changed my online banking passwords in May 2014

so it has showed on noddle as late payment for a year and a half.

 

 

A default was applied 31/01/2016 and the account was closed.

 

 

I have definitely defaulted and had I received notice I cannot afford to pay in full,

 

 

I was just surprised I didn't receive any notice.

 

 

I have not actually had any correspondence from them at all which is odd.

 

 

They have the right address.

 

I am a full time student.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No interest is being added, the debt is at £392 and has been at £392 since July 2014.

 

 

Since they had not chased me and in hadn't changed it was a low priority.

 

 

I would have liked to avoid a default if I could but that was just added.

 

 

I can still log in and view the statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the PDL forum and retitled

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they're going to 'write off' the debt, then surely the fees they have levied will be written off along with it?

 

Sounds like they know they have acted irresponsibly and don't want dragging over the coals for it.

 

What did the email say?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say they have carried out a full investigation and that carried out all required checks and saw nothing of concern on my call credit, credit report.

 

"As already alluded to, we performed a credit search at the credit reference agency Callcredit and there was nothing to suggest we shouldn’t extend credit."

 

My very low rating, £5000+ debts and 11+ defaults didn't concern them.

 

They go on to say -

"Having reviewed your complaint and understanding the situation that you now find yourself in, as gesture of goodwill, we are willing to write off the remaining balance owed of £392.00 in its entirety. This means that repaying the outstanding balance will be waived and the account closed, drawing a conclusion to the matter."

 

As long as they remove the entire entry from my credit report, I will accept this resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd accept it regardless, one more default isn't going to harm your CRF, not if you have 11 previous markers on there.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will, the only reason I'm attempting to get this one off is that they applied it January 31st so it wouldn't be off until 2022. The other were already on there and will come off much earlier. It's going to be a long time before I have anything resembling a decent score though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I figured it was something like that after I hit 'post'.

 

Plus I would 'think' that they would remove it in its entirety as there is no account to 'service' so they would have no reason to be reporting how the account is run to the CRA's, so I would think that they will remove it anyway?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have received the final response from safety net credit:

 

£392.00 outstanding will be written off, and the record will be removed from my credit file.

They will also refund £237.29 which is the amount I had repaid plus interest.

 

Very pleased with that, and only possible because of all the information that is on this forum, so big thanks

Edited by albob222001
Link to post
Share on other sites

I changed my online banking passwords in May 2014

so it has showed on noddle as late payment for a year and a half.

 

Could you just expand a bit on this please, what has your bank password got to do with it ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saftey Net credit almost acts like an automatic payday loan.

 

In order to use their service you must give your online banking ID and password. They automatically add money if you balance gets low and take it back when it get higher.

 

This might work for somebody who has their finances in order to help avoid unauthorised overdraft fees. Sadly, I borrowed the full amount and then it would repay when I got paid and I do it again, so it was just a rolling loan facility for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to use their service you must give your online banking ID and password. They automatically add money if you balance gets low and take it back when it get higher.

 

Are you serious?

 

Even my bank doesn't ask for that information? That is an extremely dangerous, and I would like to think, totally unlawful method of borrowing?

 

This might warrant further investigation by the ICO, this is clearly not right.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, totally serious, I took the loan around 3 years ago but they still operate in the same way, the only difference is they were called clear account when I first used their services. The can automatically withdraw and make deposits. I changed my passwords as I was scared they would automatically take any payments I put into my account.

 

I was desperate for the money so gave the information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. I've just been on their website to have a look see, and it seems they have the full backing of the FSA to ask vulnerable people for their bank details!

 

Truly criminal IMO, exploiting the vulnerable, what a vile industry.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saftey Net credit almost acts like an automatic payday loan.

 

In order to use their service you must give your online banking ID and password. They automatically add money if you balance gets low and take it back when it get higher.

 

This might work for somebody who has their finances in order to help avoid unauthorised overdraft fees. Sadly, I borrowed the full amount and then it would repay when I got paid and I do it again, so it was just a rolling loan facility for me.

 

Are you serious?

 

Even my bank doesn't ask for that information? That is an extremely dangerous, and I would like to think, totally unlawful method of borrowing?

 

This might warrant further investigation by the ICO, this is clearly not right.

 

I have never ever heard of such a thing and as said above, exceedingly dangerous. You have no idea who these people are. If you haven't already, I suggest you log off CAG and go and change your password now and make it a strong one.

 

Never ever give your password to anyone. Even your own bank will never ask for that.

 

In future, payments by direct debit or standing order only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. I've just been on their website to have a look see, and it seems they have the full backing of the FSA to ask vulnerable people for their bank details!

 

Truly criminal IMO, exploiting the vulnerable, what a vile industry.

 

Does it actually say that as having a license isn't the same as backing their methods ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it actually say that as having a license isn't the same as backing their methods ?

 

No not in so many words, I just saw that they are 'approved' by the FSA, so you're probably right in that they do not know this practice is going on.

 

I just find it incredible that they can even think of asking for this information???? Truly dumbfounded!

 

SafetyNet Credit’s service requires us to have read only access to your internet banking. You need to disclose your online banking log-in details to be considered for a facility. If you are given a facility we review your balance and transactions on a daily basis and monitor any changes in your financial status.

https://www.safetynetcredit.com/how-it-works-linking-to-your-bank#howitworksLinkingAccount

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they say it is "read only" access - the refund I have now received was for money they withdrew from my account. I never had a direct debit or standing order, and made them no payment by cheque or card. The only way they got the money was with their access to my online account.

 

That is why I changed all of my passwords.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also had a loan from Safety Net Credit, a limit of £140, got in to difficulty after 6 months or so, changed passwords and changed banks, they never added extra fees or extra interest, amount outstanding was £184 so £44 worth of interest charges in 6 months, I am now paying off by standing order at £10 per month. Interestingly this came up on my credit report as a 'credit card' which I thought was odd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appeared in the credit card section on my report as well.

 

They collect data on their customers (victims) spending habits as well using the "read only" access they have to the accounts - they display stats about that on their website - seems very dodgy to me. I wish I had never been as desperate as I was when I signed up to their service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...