Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Terry P vs Bank Of Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I'm up to the point of having sent an LBA to BOS, and having received a letter offering me £ 650 (claiming around £ 2,998 over the past 5 years).

 

I believe I'm only supposed to claim for charges going back 5 years ?

 

I now want to file my first claim via the small claims court -- I've downloaded the pdfs for form1a/1b - and I remember there were some examples of how to fill them out ? could someone point me in the right direction ?

 

also -- I see lots of stuff about limiting small claims to £ 750 - but I'm not 100% sure why - can someone perhaps point me in the right direction for that too ?

 

Here's a breakdown of my correspondance so far

 

SAR Sent Aug 2006

Prelim Req 7th Sept 2006

LBA Sent Mid Oct 2006

£ 650 Offer Received Start Nov 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Terry,

Yes your right about only going back the 5 years. I take it your in Scotland. You can claim between £750(Small claims) and £1,500.(Summary cause)I think with small claims if you were to loose your claim, all it can cost you is £39 court Fee ,not positive but I've heard you could loose about £750 if you go down the Summary Cause route. I've already had a claim for £720 settled in full by BOS and I'm going down to Edinburgh Sheriff Court tomorrow to claim £1,500 using Summary Cause.

The claim forms you fill in are identical, but I'm not sure how much the summary cause claim costs to lodge,(will find out tomorrow).

As you will be aware the banks do not want to go to court so you will get your cash.

Go to Forums---Guidance notes---Scottish procedure

Best wishes,

Keep us posted with your claim.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Terry looks like you still need to do some reading up.

Its essential to be fully aware of the procedures otherwise youi face problems later.

Have another look at the faqs if not already conversant with them.

Read a few other BOS threads and as suggested look in the Scottish section.

All the answers you are looking for are here.

And of course for the techo stuff theres Site helpers and Mods never too far away.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - Hoping to pop forms for a small claim into Dunfermline Sherrif Court tomorrow - but I'm still a little unsure about some things :

 

1. Section 4 of form1a / 1b :

 

"The Pursuer claims from the Defender the sum of £ xxx.xx with interest on that sum at the rate of 8% annually from the date of service for each charge (together with the expenses of bringing the action)"

 

not 100% sure how to read this - does it mean I'm claiming £ xxx.xx which is just the total of the charges, plus interest on each of those charges since the date of each charge ? (which is how it sounds)

 

or is £ xxx.xx the total of the charges, plus the interest on each of those charges since the date of the charges, and the "8% annually from the date of service" is about the interest from the date I submit my case to the court ?

 

e.g. interest on the charges plus the interest on those charges ?

 

 

all help much appreciated ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - another one -- sorry to have so many questions -- just want to be sure..

 

My bank statements have both "Charges as Notified" and "Maintenance charge" listed - both of which I have counted in my previous letters to BOS, is it OK to claim these "Maintenance charges" thru the court ?

 

(The "Maintenance charges" seem to be applied at the end of the month if I have had "excess o/d charges" during that period -- so I think I can claim those too).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...