Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Account fee Barclays


rob14973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2488 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Ok i am trying to Re claim my accounts fees as they were missed sold to me. I have all my statements after i finally got my SAR request through.

 

I am claiming back to 2006 when i was signed up to additions account without my knowledge.

 

I have drafted this letter.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account name: First Additions

Account number:

 

I have had the above account since 1st February 2006 but believe it was mis-sold to me for the following reasons.

 

- I didn’t know I was paying and don’t remember ever agreeing to having this account.

- I was upgraded without my knowledge.

- I wasn’t told there was an alternative, free account.

 

 

I am writing to request a full refund of the fees I have paid plus any interest owed to me. I have enclosed a copy of the schedule of account fee charges.

 

I look forward to your response within eight weeks, otherwise I won’t hesitate taking my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Now i may need to change the last paragraph as going to the fos is a waist of time. So i believe the court route is required. Can someone tell me what the timings are before court action is this similar to bank charges.

 

Thx

 

Rob

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Andy i am aware of the link you posted but i want to bypass the FOS.

 

I just asking for timescales from the above letter i posted to a letter before action and then court.

 

Regards

 

Rob

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

The threat of the last sentence is really added for leverage ...its irrelevant whether you do or dont refer the matter...or maybe might not need to..it simply adds clout .

 

Test the water with the initial letter and see what response ..if any..you get and then we can talk about LBAs and court claims.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Update

 

I have used a interest calculator at 24.9% and the amounts to reclaim back is just under 4k with 2500 of that interest.

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

:wink: as long as you can equate 24.9% has been applied to the package fee

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, I have received my letter from Barclays today dismissing my complaint on the grounds that I signed up to the addition account in branch and they would have explained to my wife the benefits.

 

Following my investigation I have identified that your application for both upgrades were submitted in branch. This means that at the point of applying for this account we did not give you any advice. You made your own decision as to whether you could have benefited from the features it included. WRONG YOU GAVE ADVICE ITS THIS ACCOUNT AND YOU HAVE TO PAY AND THERE ARE NO FREE ACCOUNTS. WHY WOULD WE SIGN UP TO BENEFITS WE DONT NEED OR NEVER USE.

 

I am satisfied that Additions Active Account was suitable for you. Our branch process was to explain to our customers the range of options available, the features and limitations of the products. You would have been asked which you felt was most suitable for you and asked to sign an Additions Acknowledgement confirming your choice of account. Our records show that you signed an Additions Acknowledgement on 21 October 2010. I have enclosed a copy of this with this letter. YES WE SIGNED HOWEVER ON THE GROUNDS THERE WAS NO FREE ACCOUNTS. WHY WOULD WE QUERY AFETR BEING TOLD IN 2006 THERE WERE NO FREE ACCOUNTS

 

I am satisfied that you consented to the additions Active upgrade of your account. Your account was upgraded in our branch on 21 October 2010 and you signed an additions acknowledgement confirming your choice of account. I have enclosed a copy of your signed additions acknowledgement with this letter. YES PAID ACCOUNT AND ONLY A PAID ACCOUNT A FREE ONE WAS NEVER OFFERED.

 

For the first additions upgrade, our processing branch was to present you with a range of product options and explain the features and limitations of your preferred product. We would then obtain your consent to proceed with that account you would have been asked to sign and acknowledgement letter to confirm your choice. we have no evidence to suggest that this process was not followed. However. as you upgraded your account so long ago, we no longer have a copy of your signed acknowledgement letter on file. THE REASON WHY, YOU UPGRADED WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE AND WHEN QUERIED ALL ACCOUNTS HAVE A CHARGE

 

I have reviewed this information and i am satisfied that you were provided with enough information to make an informed decision to upgrade this account.

 

Following my investigation i have identified that you held a non fee paying account before you upgraded in January 2006. This means that at the point of applying for this account you were aware that this account was optional and that there were fee free alternatives. IT WAS DONE WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED DOCUMENT TO TELL ME OTHERWISE.

Following my investigation i am satisfied that you were:

 

Given the cost of your additions active as this clearly states on your signed additions acknowledgement with this letter.

 

As my investigation has found nothing to support the complaint points which you have raised i am unable to uphold your complaint.

 

Ok Whats the next step LBA

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

In your first post above, you said, "I didn’t know I was paying and don’t remember ever agreeing to having this account."

 

But in your comments in post #9 above, you said you paid for the Additions a/c because you were unaware of a free alternative.

 

These two scenarios appear to be contradictory and you need to address this before you reply to the bank.

 

Personally, I think you'd be unwise to wade in with a court claim including restitutionary interest.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

In 2006 the additions account was upgraded without my knowledge. i noticed an account fee coming out and when i queried it was told its a charge for the account i said i didnt want it but was told i had to and no free account was offered.

 

2010 is upgraded again to additions plus ( done by my wife) but was told it needed to be upgraded but you do get more benefits my wife did say we dont use the benefits but was told we had to if we wanted the account so she agreed to keep the account however if a free account was offered we would have took it. Why would we pay for benefits we dont use?

 

Why is it unwise they mis sold the account. I am very angry we were made to pay for something when we didn't have to i want to claim it back but with the 8%

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just claim the standard 8% if it does get to court instead of putting restitution...at 24.9% in your complaint ...that is probably why your complaint was rejected.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

When i sent the complaint i claimed for the 8% and not 24% thought i had more chance but they have rejected it. I am going to send an LBA and see what happens.

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have just requested the fees in all honesty......interest only becomes part of the equation when a claim is issued

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have just requested the fees in all honesty......interest only becomes part of the equation when a claim is issued

Well I will probably end up claiming anyway.

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi rob14973,

 

did you get resolution with this? I am currently with the FOS with a claim for mis-selling of account and o/d charges reclaim for financial hardship. The FOS seems to side with the bank and is asking for tocs of the accounts I held at the time, Additions, Additions plus and Premier. The bank has lied about products provided on these accounts and I need access to welcome packs and terms of conditions for the said accounts. Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by slick132
removed quote of post #9
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...