Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard. PPI and "linked cards"?***Successful Claim***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry about the late reply chaps - work called!

Slick - this is the new breakdown they sent me,

 

Total statutory compensation on new calculation £394.51

Total statutory compensation on previous refund £37.79

Additional statutory compensation paid £56.72

20% income tax deducted from additional statutory compensation £71.34

 

then of course, interest is applied but they dont give those amounts.

 

CitizenB, thats a very interesting read. And yes, it looks like it most certainly applies to me. Its a pity the FOS were not involved, that would have given any letter I wrote, some weight. But Im certainly going to get back on their case so to speak. Ive just got to figure out how to word the letter in view of the actions of RBS etc.

 

And for the record - when the cheque clears (Thursday I think) I will be donating £50 to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many many thanks merlin for your generous donation which helps us to cover our Forum costs and helps us to continue to help others.

 

Well done on your claim...excellent result.

 

Thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Great work by all involved

 

Regards

 

Andyorch

 

 

Thread linked to the PPI Success Forum

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

£50 to CAG :-D

 

yes, thank you for this. I sent you an email about this when we received your gift but as you have a Hotmail address, my message may have gone to your spam folder. Please do check it.

 

Considering the amount that you have received by way of a refund, your donation is incredibly generous. We really are very grateful.

 

I hope you won't mind me using this post to make a point to others who read this. We have many people who have received many thousands of pounds in PPI refunds because of our help but most of the time we don't even get thank you – let alone a donation.

 

We did get another donation of £50 from someone two or three years ago. Their PPI refund was over £40,000 – it might have been £60,000, I can't quite remember.

 

As I have said, your donation was extremely generous. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder. Just checked my emails and yours didnt arrive, unless you are busty Svetlana from Latvia looking for a hot-blooded Englishman to have lots of boobies (sic) with? Maybe I looked in the wrong box there?

Anyway, to be honest, I didnt think £50 was such a big deal seeing as I got just over a grand back that I would otherwise have never seen had it not been for CAG.

This is one great website and Ive learned so much from people like yourself, Andyorch, dx100 and a few more.

I noticed when I sent the money that there is provision to become a regular contributor to the site so Im chucking in a tenner on the 1st of every month.

Ive been on many sites like this one over the years, learning how to beat the finance industry and play them at their own game, but none have come even a close second to CAG. The others seem to have one chip or another on their shoulders and consequently their advice frequently advocates pointless threats that make any correspondence look childish. CAG thankfully, isnt like that.

Ill let you all know when Ive set the payment up.

Thanks everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi merlin,

 

Can I also echo Andyorch and Bankfodders posts thanking you for your donation, it really is very much appreciated. Like yourself I also came to CAG when I was in need of advice on how to take on the Finance industry regarding Bank charges and more recently PPI, I've been here a while now and all the advice and encouragement I've had has been spot on.

 

Thank you again.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys. Just looked into donating a tenner a month. It doesnt give me a date option so Ill set it up on Thursday (1st June) and hopefully it will then come out on the first of every month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just sent the email to you again. It should have arrived in the last couple minutes.

 

Your regular payment is a really generous gesture – but if you don't mind I think I would rather decline. You've already been incredibly generous and it's not for you to try and carry the weight of everybody else's "forgetfulness" on your own shoulders.

 

Don't let me mislead you. We pay our expenses and we are not at risk. If we were seriously in trouble then I would be putting out a special appeal to everybody and in our newsletter. It would simply be nice to be rather more comfortable about things and a few years ago we used to have a regular site team weekend, for instance where we would discuss the forum and discuss ideas and also have a meal together. We haven't had this for a long time.

 

There are probably lots of other things that we could do if we had more money – but of course the real problem is getting other people to be aware of the value that they get from us and the fact that in a huge number of cases, they wouldn't have got their money back or even have thought to get their money back if it hadn't been for our help.

 

Once again, your donation was fantastic – I'd be very grateful if you waited until you had another result before making any further gifts to us – but if you do get a result then just send us a blank cheque and I'll fill in the details!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder, I got the second email thank you.

Well I didnt expect a regular contribution to be turned down but I guess its your decision.

 

I couldnt believe it when you told me how you all helped someone get a refund of between £40k to £60k of PPI and they only donated £50. That seems a bit mean.

I offered the regular contribution because of the position I am in today as opposed to some years ago when i was married to a greedy and selfish ex-wife.

It was because of the desperate situation she created that I found CAG.

 

After years of crushing debt she finally upped and left and walked away from it, leaving me to deal with it all.

Had it not been for CAG, I would have probably gone under in some way. Instead, slowly but surely I began to read about everyone elses problems and the solutions CAG provided which lead to my fight back against the banks and loan companies. And most of it was very successful! You all have my undying thanks for this.

But I didnt just find CAG. There are many other sites offering advice on how to deal with debt, but they seem to have their own agendas.

Some, like the infamous Martin Lewis sites, really only recommend offering reduced payments or a grovelling approach to the banks etc, they rarely suggest challenging the authenticity of an Agreement or the crushing unfairness of multiple charges intended to bury the debtor further.

 

Others appear to have a chip on their shoulders that taints any suggested response with an air of arrogance and/or intimidation.

None of this advice is very helpful. The advice from CAG however, is simply legal and logical.

Because of CAG, you are now talking to someone who has a completely different perspective of money.

 

Myself and my wife earn over £5k a month and we only have basic commitments ( mortgage, utilities etc) other than one car on finance for the Mrs. My car was paid off two years ago and I flatly refuse to renew it! Mind you, it mainly sits in the garage and covers around 2000 miles a year!

 

What Im trying to say Bankfodder, is that you are talking to someone who doesnt believe in much - Im very much someone who believes what he sees rather than what he hears. But I believe very much in CAG and would have liked to have contributed in some small way. A tenner a month was never going to break the bank, so to speak!

 

Ill leave this decision to you then, the offer will always stand. Ill be around for a long time.

Now to SAR Welcome and Citibank!

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall be following your journey with Citibank as I think will many others... nasty bank :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi all, this a long overdue update regarding the battle between me and Citi regarding their error of refunding my ex wholly on a joint account.

I think Im going to give up the ghost on this one because they are adamant that although they originally made the mistake, they are not going to be held responsible for putting it right, - HOWEVER------

 

This morning I got two letters from Canada square ( who are dealing with Citi claims). One letter contained a covering letter addressed to me telling me once again to get stuffed, we are not putting it right, now please go away and leave us alone. The other 8 pages are for a claim made by a woman in Buckinghamshire that has been upheld and a full breakdown of the refund. I will post it on to her tonight.

 

Now for letter No2. Again they have made it very clear that they will not put the third account right and that I should go and have a chat with my ex in the hope that she will give me the couple of grand back. Ive got even less of a chance with that one!

BUT - there is a paragraph that reads - "We would like to make you aware that a separate complaint under the reference COM/xxxxx/2018 has been set up to investigate Other General Insurance that may have been applied to your accounts. You will receive separate correspondence quoting this reference regarding this."

 

Now this is all very well and good, but you would think that throughout 2 years of hassle from me, someone somewhere would have already spotted this "Other General Insurance"?

Which begets the question that if the term "PPI" is simply a generic umbrella term that encompasses many insurance products, why do they now have a "Other General Insurance" category and consequently, should I start pestering them again with a host of "Other General Insurance" complaints?

Anyway, lets see what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you mind if I make this Citi one its own thread please merlin?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually having reviewed the thread its better here still

urm..nice complaint about sending others details could be useful...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...