Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The work programme


louise2012
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's worse than people make out!

 

This is how they meet their targets and sanction claimants, thus saving the government money by not paying the claimant.

 

A truly atrocious piece of legislation meted out by those living in cloud cuckoo land having never done an honest days work themselves.

http://www.cpag.org.uk/content/ask-cpag-online-how-can-you-avoid-jsa-work-programme-sanction

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has your adviser just only mentioned the Work Programme to you, or has he begun the process of referring you?

 

Either way I suggest you familiarise yourself with the Guidances at this link. That's just for starters.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/work-programme-dwp-provider-guidance

 

The thread called Ingeus might also be worthwhile perusing. There you will find 6,293 post (at last count) with comments, remarks, opinions on WP.

 

Then check out the hundreds of other forums containing thousands of threads, millions of comments, remarks, opinions.

 

After all that you would probably consider Bazooka Boo's comments as an under-statement.

 

Enjoy!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advisor mentioned it in passing yesterday when I went to sign on and am already getting worried over having to take part in it

 

As you have been claiming JSA (or UC) for twelve months, you now qualify for a referral to the Work Programme. You should get a letter from the DWP inviting you in for a referral meeting where the goals of the WP should be explained to you. If you have a job lined up, this is the time to ask (insist) on a postponement of the referral and/or discuss any problems you might face, e.g.: Care duties towards a minor or elderly family member, transport issues that might limit the times & days you could attend.

 

Suffice to say, most of the above will be ignored, but you might get the referral suspended if you do have a job in the pipeline.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful G4C89 following advice from here.

I'm sure people mean well, but they're ultimately all keyboard warriors shouting a good game about what you "should" do. But when you're actually in the job centre looking behind you for support in the real world?

Nope!

If you get sanctioned they will be nowhere to be seen, but they'll feel good for telling you what you should/would/could do.

Take any advice you get here with a pinch of salt.

They're all nutters on ESA anyway, if they're so clever why can't they even get a job in the real world?!! Ask yourself that before taking any internet advice!

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful G4C89 following advice from here.

I'm sure people mean well, but they're ultimately all keyboard warriors shouting a good game about what you "should" do. But when you're actually in the job centre looking behind you for support in the real world?

Nope!

If you get sanctioned they will be nowhere to be seen, but they'll feel good for telling you what you should/would/could do.

Take any advice you get here with a pinch of salt.

They're all nutters on ESA anyway, if they're so clever why can't they even get a job in the real world?!! Ask yourself that before taking any internet advice!

Good luck.

 

Jonnie, I work full time with no benefits at all. So your term with

 

They're all nutters on ESA anyway, if they're so clever why can't they even get a job in the real world?!! Ask yourself that before taking any internet advice!

 

Seems slightly unfair.

 

Please may I ask you to consider what you post in future, any assistance given to the OP should be reasonable and helpful.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get sanctioned they will be nowhere to be seen, but they'll feel good for telling you what you should/would/could do.

Take any advice you get here with a pinch of salt.

They're all nutters on ESA anyway, if they're so clever why can't they even get a job in the real world?!!

 

Not all are "nutters on ESA", and some of us have actually found a proper job after claiming benefits. Furthermore, one or two of us will go above and beyond offering advice and guidance.

 

Certainly take advice posted on an anonymous forum with a little bit salt and temper it to fit in with the immediate circumstances. i.e. If you have an adviser demonstrating open hostility and hell bent on raising a benefit doubt, try to defuse the situation rather than stoking the fire.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not an ESA claimant and never have been. I suppose it's for others to judge whether or not I am a "nutter"...

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Lou...

 

Now that we are back to normality, with this, I would suggest you take it a step at a time, I have personally never had to deal with said programme.

Some may find it useful, some may not. Are you deffo being put to it?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful G4C89 following advice from here.

I'm sure people mean well, but they're ultimately all keyboard warriors shouting a good game about what you "should" do. But when you're actually in the job centre looking behind you for support in the real world?

Nope!

If you get sanctioned they will be nowhere to be seen, but they'll feel good for telling you what you should/would/could do.

Take any advice you get here with a pinch of salt.

They're all nutters on ESA anyway, if they're so clever why can't they even get a job in the real world?!! Ask yourself that before taking any internet advice!

Good luck.

 

Isn't it just the case that you're on JSA and got sanctioned, It wasn't anyone's fault on here you got sanctioned, You came here for advice originally, Now because you didn't get the advice you thought may help you're case you are warning other users.

 

No need to take you're anger out on the forum or the people who give advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know there is threads already about this but I went to my local job centre to sign on and my advisor said that I've been out of work for a year, he mentioned the work programme to me.

 

Is it as bad as people make out?

 

Thanks

 

The work program is a 2 year referral and 2 years must be completed which can be spread out through many years i.e. signing off then on won't make it go away.

 

The work program can be bad, Sometimes you might get power mad advisers who maybe a little harsh in how they react to you're job searches etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I next sign on Monday 8 February and it will be probably mentioned to me then. All he said that it would be additional support for me but will keep an eye on the post though.

 

I was told the same thing in 2012. I actually found the complete opposite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful G4C89 following advice from here.

I'm sure people mean well, but they're ultimately all keyboard warriors shouting a good game about what you "should" do. But when you're actually in the job centre looking behind you for support in the real world?

Nope!

If you get sanctioned they will be nowhere to be seen, but they'll feel good for telling you what you should/would/could do.

Take any advice you get here with a pinch of salt.

They're all nutters on ESA anyway, if they're so clever why can't they even get a job in the real world?!! Ask yourself that before taking any internet advice!

Good luck.

 

Are you saying everyone on ESA are mentally ill? if so can I have your contact details please, I a in no way mentally ill and on ESA for a physical problem! Who are you to pass such comments about peiople you dont know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you deffo being put to it?

 

The government has made it mandatory for all the unemployed to be referred to a Work Programme provider after claiming qualifying benefits for twelve months. Some claimants will receive a mandatory referral earlier (JSA prison leavers on day one, 18-24 year old claimants after 9 months). The full list of groups and their entry point can be found in Annex A of the Work Programme Provider Guidance, Chapter 2.

 

It is worth reading all the guidance notes* issued by the DWP along with the live memos as these documents form part of the provider's contract. If the participant knows what the DWP expect, then they can challenge the provider if they overstep the line in terms of what they claim or do (or don't do in many cases).

 

*) WP provider guidance: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/work-programme-dwp-provider-guidance

Generic guidance for ALL DWP funded programmes: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/framework-generic-guidance-provider-guidance

Running live memos: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/work-programme-provider-live-running-memos

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wind your neck in jonnietemple!

 

I don't know why you got sanctioned and you won't actually say, but if you've got the same attitude at the Job Centre as you have on this forum I'm not surprised you got sanctioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Louise

 

The rules and regulations covering the Work Programme are contained in the publication – Work Programme Provider Guidance

 

This Guidance, which is a government/DWP publication, may be accessed via this link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/work-programme-dwp-provider-guidance

 

The first step in referring a claimant to the Work Programme is supposed to be undertaken at a person to person, face to face interview with a JCP adviser/coach.

 

In Chapter 1 - Introduction & Overview - the first step in referring a claimant to the Work Programme (WP) is clearly stated in paragraph 14:

 

Referral

14. Participants will be referred by Jobcentre Plus at a Work Programme referral interview, where they will be given information about their rights and responsibilities and the minimum service standards that they can expect from you. Jobcentre Plus will randomly allocate Participants, according to market share arrangements, and will supply you with information about each participant.

 

Paragraph 5 states:

 

5. All claimants due to join the Work Programme will be referred to you by Jobcentre Plus. Jobcentre Plus advisers will determine a claimant’s eligibility for the Programme and, where claimants have the option to volunteer, will determine whether the Work Programme is the most appropriate option for that person.

 

This means, then, that during this initial interview claimants must be given all the relevant information concerning the Programme including rights, responsibilities and the minimum service standards to expect. It also points out that the JCP adviser/coach should have already taken into account factors relating to the claimant’s eligibility for mandatory or voluntary referral in the first place. To this end claimants would be advised to ascertain for themselves which category of claimant they are and that the referral is appropriate in their circumstances.

 

In Chapter 2 – WP Claimant Groups - the different claimant groups that can participate in WP is outlined, so it is important to know this. Paragraph 6 lists the claimant groups/categories:

 

Claimant Participation Requirements

6. The participation requirements of claimants are dependent on whether they are:

 

Mandatory JSA participants - All JSA participants (regardless of whether they have opted for entry early) will be required to participate, and can be mandated to apply for or take up work if it is reasonable. The only exception are JSA participants in receipt of Credits Only who can decide to join the Work Programme and participate on a voluntary basis. (Further information regarding mandating participants and circumstances where participation restrictions must be taken into account can be found in: Work Programme Guidance Chapter 3a – Mandation).

 

Mandatory ESA participants - All mandatory ESA participants (regardless of whether they have opted for early entry) can be required to undertake work-related activity that is reasonable in their circumstances. You can support ESA participants to apply for and take up work, but you may not mandate these participants to apply for jobs, undertake medical treatment, take up work or unpaid work experience.

 

IS Lone Parent participants – where a lone parent who has a child aged 3 or 4 years volunteers for the Work programme, on or after 28/04/2014 their referral becomes mandatory. You can support IS participants to apply for and take up work, but you may not mandate these participants to apply for jobs, undertake medical treatment, take up work or unpaid work experience

 

Voluntary participants - Voluntary participants are not required to take part and their participation remains on an entirely voluntary basis. You may not mandate voluntary participants to undertake activity.

 

If you feel, during the interview and before signing the referral form, that there are points that need further advice or clarification ask to be given appropriate time for this. It is up to you to decide if the information you are given is adequate for deciding whether or not the activity being suggested is appropriate in your circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...