Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Documents arrived today dated 27th March.  This is a cc taken out a long time ago (2008) and they don't seem to have been able to provide a copy of a CCA agreement, just reams of print outs of lines of texts from old bank statements, default notices etc.   
    • Documents finally arrived today from PRA group.  New day have sent me lots of paperwork, copies of default letters and statements, print out of what looks like a CCA that would have been completed on online, IP address as signature.  This debt is not too old, so possible this is the true copy of agreement ?  Not sure what my defence would be beyond irresponsible lending. 
    • pers i wouldn't.. all you need to know is in the posts of that thread....that being section 127(3) of the CCA refers. if under a CCA return, the 'creditor' claims its a recon, it must not contain any details like a sig, tickbox, or typed name (whether you signed physically or by online tickbox) 1. those are not necessary in a recon, so why inc them? (faked??) 2, it cant thus be a recon!!, it must be a copy of the 'original' from the original creditor, not from a debt buyers filing cabinet. they shouldn't not be 'mixing' some original docs from the OC with crap from their filing cabinet, claiming its ALL a recon! because some of it is faked. just remember there are far more docs like NOA and a DN that are as equally important to a court claim of 'this debt is enforceable'. never rely solely upon the dodgy agreement argument.
    • India has thousands of small gold refineries which are facing more competition from big players.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

QQ PDL sold to Red Castle, written off deb,t but won't remove from credit file.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been on this debt journey for a while now.

I got sucked into the cycle of payday loans,

all of which I paid off until it got too much and I defaulted with QQ at just under £1000

 

This was then sold to RedCastle.

I emailed Redcastle in October Asking them to provide information on the debt as

there were two separate entries for the same amount with different default dates on my credit file.

One from Redcastle and the original one with QQ.

I Sent a copy of my request to QQ and they removed their entry.

 

I have now received this letter from Redcastle Recoveries.

 

We are writing to you in relation to your above numbered loan that you originally took out with CashEuroNet.uk-QuickQuid,

and which was subsequently acquired by us.

 

Please note that we have now taken the decision to write off the balance and close your account.

What this means for you:

 

  • The balance on your loan is no longer due
  • l We will no longer contact you regarding the above numbered account
  • l You do not need to repay the balance of the above numbered account

 

However, please note that because you have not repaid the balance due in relation to this account,

if your credit file shows a balance is outstanding it will continue to do so

for a period of time no greater than six years from the date that you originally defaulted

on your agreement with CashEuroNet.uk-QuickQuid.

 

You should also be aware that this may affect your ability to gain credit with other lenders,

and that should you choose to repay this balance at a later date your credit file will be updated to reflect this.

 

If you would like to speak to one of our agents regarding this matter then please contact them via 0344 894 1930 or alternatively via email on .

 

Now I have contacted QQ and complained about the affordability of my loan and I am waiting on their decision,

I had hoped that either they would effect the writing off of my loan or they would pay me the interest on all of my loans

and I could clear it as it is the last remaining unpaid debt on my credit file.

 

I called quick quid and they said they have not made a decision on my complaint

and they did not contact Redcastle. So I am wondering why would they do this?

 

Should I just be happy they will not pursue.

But the whole point is to repair my credit so at some point in the future I can try to buy a house.

 

Any ideas as to what I should do?

 

Thanks

 

Tia

Link to post
Share on other sites

p'haps have to await the irresponsible lending enq from QQ

 

 

did you fwd a copy of the QQ letter stating CRA file removal to reds?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk

 

This is what I am thinking, but I am concerned that since QQ removed their default and RedCastle put theirs up, they might not honour QQ's ruling if it is in my favour.

 

If I receive my interest back and pay RedCastle, how can i ensure they will remove the entry?

 

Also as QQ no longer own the debt, what will happen if QQ agrees to irresponsible lending? will the interest be taken off the loan even though it is no longer with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the loan will not exist..they must remove it.

 

 

pers I'd be giving the FOS a quick call

 

 

if you read here, they act rather quickly with regard to QQ stuff.

 

 

what RC are doing is WRONG.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I thought something seemed rather fishy about this situation.

 

Apparently I have to wait until 8 weeks after my complaint to contact the FOS about QQ, but I most certainly will contact them about this letter.

 

I have never heard of a DCA telling someone not to pay but the debt still exists? How is that possible?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't have to wait to get advise from the FOS or even the FCA.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't have to wait to get advise from the FOS or even the FCA.

 

Contacted FOS who said to wait until I receive a response from QQ Due 13/01/16.

 

Called FCA who said there is no rule prohibiting DCA'S from writing off the debt and leaving it on my credit file.

 

I have called Red Castle twice requesting an explanation as to why they wrote off the Loan. No response.

 

I am applying for a position in the bank, they will credit search me and this is the only unpaid default and the only one since 2012.

 

The deadline for the application is 4th Jan 2016. I am thinking, should i offer to pay like £200 for the complete removal from my credit file? I figure since they are willing to just write it off they might remove it for financial gain?

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally you should be using the phone to a dca without recording the call.

 

 

it has been known for DCA's to remove an account if you offer to pay it off.

 

 

however you need to be extremely careful

 

 

and get the exact wording from them in an email

should they agree.

 

 

i'e that ALL NEGATIVE DATA AND the whole account will be removed from the cra system [all 3 of the providers]

and that they will never sell or chase the debt again.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I FIRST SENT THIS TO REDCASTLE BACK IN July.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

template removed - dx

 

A few days later they said

 

Dear ,

 

Thank you for your email the contents of which have been duly noted.

 

We have raised a query on your behalf with our client, QuickQuid,

in order to obtain the documentation you have requested.

 

Your account has been placed on hold and once we have a response

we will be in contact to discuss this further with you.

 

Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact us by e-mail,

or by telephone on: 0344 894 1952.

 

Kind Regards

 

and then nothing until this letter.

 

And now i am thinking of sending this:

 

Good Afternoon

 

Thank you for your communication by text message, I downloaded the letter, a copy of which is attached.

 

My understanding of this letter is that you do not require me to pay you back but the debt is still owed?

 

Since my initiating contact with you was all about repairing damage to my credit file, I need to see what can be done to remove this altogether.

 

I am currently in communication with the financial Ombudsman Service and Quick Quid as I had numerous loans with them that were unaffordable. I am awaiting confirmation from QQ as to their position and then if i am unsatisfied will return to the ombudsman with my complaint.

 

whilst I appreciate the loan being written off my primary concern is my credit file. I am looking for work in the Financial Service Idustry and this is causing a problem.

 

If (and i believe they will) QQ / Ombudsman deem the loans unaffordable all records would be removed from my credit file.

 

How would this happen if the current entry is from you, but relating to that debt?

 

Could I offer a payment of 20% to close the account and get immediate removal?

 

what do you think and thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

load of garbage..sorry.

 

 

its irresponsible lending.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll see if can write something later.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...