Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
    • Less than 1% of Japan's top companies are led by women despite years of efforts to address the issue.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letter of claim received BW Legal HSBC loan


Wic76
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon,

 

Looking for some advice; got a letter of claim for a loan I took out with HSBC around 5 years ago?

 

I was made redundant at the time and couldn't keep up with the repayments,

when I tried to claim on my PPI for the payments, they said I didn't have any even though they were charging me for it.

 

 

So I stopped paying them, and they kept switching the debt around from collector to collector,

until they got to Lowell and then now BW Legal.

 

I hope someone can give me some info on how to respond!

 

In order for us to help you we require the following information:-

 

? Lowell

 

. Received today.

 

 

 

. HSBC, for a loan that I couldn't afford to repay once I was made redundant and they refused to honour their payment protection on at the time.

 

£3001.14

 

or after 2007? After.

 

 

Why did you cease payments? approx 2010

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, they would not honour PPI even though they were charging for it each month prior to my redundancy.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

Yes, although as I was unemployed I advised I could not pay at all, which is why I wanted to use my insurance.

Edited by Wic76
Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is not from the court ? It is a letter from BW Legal warning that they will issue a court claim ?

 

Edit your first post, as claimant will be Lowell and not your name.

 

Send a CCA request letter to Lowell, with a copy of the letter copied to BW Legal. If you click on CCA request, there is a link for the letter.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should get all statements of account from HSBC, as well as all other documents, by sending HSBC a Data Protection Subject Access Request. The information may help with any court claim and in claiming back any PPI payments you made. The request can be sent to HSBC head office, with any references or your name, date of birth and address at the time, plus what account the request relates to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send cca request to Lowell and a letter (formal complaint)putting the ac into dispute due to the ppi

Once you receive the SAR response get a formal complaint into HSBC to reclaim the misold ppi

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also send a copy of your cca request (minus payment )and formal complaint to BW, just so there is no misunderstanding saying this is what you have forwarded to Lowell

 

just to stop them in their tracks

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've drafted a letter to sent to Lowell (based on the links provided) - would this be ok?

 

 

"Dear Sir or Madam

Re:− The attached correspondence (Willis Hall v. Lowell)

 

 

Please note for your records that the I dispute the debt in question

– I held a PPI policy with HSBC relevant to the same, that was not honoured once I was made redundant.

 

 

The failure of the PPI policy to respond is why the debt in question is now allegedly in default.

 

 

This letter also acts as a formal request pursuant etc etc.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully"

 

 

And I'm going to send the other request to HSBC next week for the potential PPI claim.

 

 

I mean, is there any chance I could ask them to call it quits?

(I won't pursue PPI if they don't pursue the alleged debt?)

 

 

Also, am I breaking any chance of it becoming statute barred by responding now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

template letter removed, as for members only

 

the letter from bw was a letter before action, if they were to issue a claim it would stop the sb clock on issue

so you need to judge whether you think they will persue their threat or not

 

if you send your letter to lowell, head it Formal Complaint and expand it a little

enclose the cca request as a seperate letter

if you think they will issue a claim, imo I would stop them in their tracks and reclaim the ppi

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for modifying my post; was just logging on to clean it up, as it copied across from word weirdly! I'll use the template for the document request and send the complaint separately then; hopefully that will put them off. I'll let you know how I get on, and thanks for all your help so far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, I sent the above to BW Legal back at the time and they went away until recently!

 

I received the following back then :-

 

"Good afternoon,

 

We write with regard to the below email, the contents of which has been noted.

 

We thank you for your reply and your request for a copy of the agreement between you and HSBC.

 

Please note that we have attempted to contact you on the number provided in the below email but with no success.

 

We now hold only xxxx as a contact number for you as we can see that you have requested that we only contact that number. Apologies for any attempts that were made to your work number but when we were originally asked to remove the landline number, there was no security passed. Without passing security we are unable to amend any details as there is no confirmation it was yourself making the request. As per the Data Protection Act, security questions need to be answered on every call.

 

We have requested from our client a copy of the original agreement so that it can be sent to you as you have requested. As our client may need to contact the original creditor for these documents we are unable to guarantee a timescale for obtaining these but we will endeavour to obtain them as soon as possible.

 

With regard to your question concerning who to contact to make an insurance claim. Any insurance claim needs to be made by you with the insurance company you had the policy with.

 

Our case will be held and so no further action will be taken on this matter, while we obtain and provide the requested documentation.

 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact our office on xxxx.

 

Kindest regards"

 

But no proof was ever sent.

 

Today I received:

 

"Dear Sir,

Our Client: Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

Our Reference: xxxx

Balance Due: £3001.14

Original Creditor: HSBC Bank Plc

Original Account Number: xxxxxxxx

We have been instructed by Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd to commence Legal Action and issue a Claim against you in the County Court in respect of the above debt.

Legal Proceedings

If payment or a response is not received before 28 September 2017, we will issue a Claim against you in the County Court without further notice. Such legal action may result in you being liable for court fees, solicitors' costs and statutory interest which are estimated below.

Principal Debt £3001.14

Estimated Interest £1378.72

Estimated Court Fees £185.00

Estimated Solicitors' Costs £80.00

Estimated Total £4644.86

If payment or a response is not received following a County Court Claim, a County Court Judgment ("CCJ") may be entered against you. A CCJ will be recorded on your credit file for 6 years unless you pay the Judgment debt in full within a month of the CCJ being entered. A CCJ on your credit file may affect your ability to obtain future credit. If you fail to comply with the CCJ order we may apply to the County Court to take one of the following enforcement actions to recover this debt:

Warrant of Control: A County Court Bailiff visiting you at your home.

Attachment of Earnings: Your employer may be ordered to deduct payments from your wages.

Charging Order: To secure the amount outstanding under the Judgment against any property that you own.

Order to Attend Court For Questioning: You being ordered to attend court to disclose your financial circumstances.

What You Need TO Do Now

To avoid the need for Legal Action and the additional fees, costs and interest estimated above payment of £3001.14 is required before 28 September 2017.

Call us today on xxxxxx to discuss this matter with one of our helpful team. If you are unable to pay the sum of £3001.14 immediately, we can set up an affordable payment arrangement for you. If you dispute this debt, please tell us why so that we can help resolve this matter.

Email us today at xxxx and we can look to set up an affordable payment arrangement for you.

When contacting us by email please provide the following:

our reference "xxxxx" and

your full name; and

date of birth; and

address including postcode; and

contact number; and

how we can help; or

provide details of any questions/queries

We can also accept payment by a variety of methods which are specified in the attached document. Direct Debit and recurring card payment are the most popular choices as you only need to tell us your preferred date for payment and the payment will be taken automatically each month so you do not have to worry about it.

Yours faithfully,

BW Legal

bw legal"

 

So now I'm panicking a little. Is the debt statute barred, and can they proceed to court without further evidence of the debt?

 

I sent the following:

 

"I have yet to receive the proof referenced.

 

Furthermore, I do not admit liability for this debt, and I do not intend to make any further payments to it for the following reasons:

 

The earliest point at which you could have sued for the full balance owing to this debt was more than six years ago

No payment has been made to this debt by me, any joint account-holder, or any third party acting as my agent for a period of more than six years

No written admission of liability for this debt has been made by me, or any third party acting as my agent for a period of more than six years

 

This debt is therefore statute barred and any court claim to recover it will be defended on this basis. If you have evidence that this debt isn’t statute barred, please send it to me within 21 days. Otherwise, please confirm in writing that you won’t pursue me further for this debt.

 

Kind Regards,

 

 

xxxxx"

 

Will that be enough or is further action required?

 

Sorry if I'm necroing this, just thought having all the info in one place would be best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...