Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, I agree with what you are saying, I only mentioned the governing body code of practice as a nod to the fact that I wasn't dismissing the BPA or whoever out of hand, thought that would go in my favour before a judge. I wrote a long post about the BPA CoP earlier but then deleted it because I realised I wasn't talking about points of law but a set of guidelines drawn up by one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans. It is ludicrous that the 5 minute consideration period doesn't apply if the motorist parks, such nonsense. As for legislation, I was referring to the government legislation (if it is legislation?) document which has been withdrawn. Does that stand until it has been reintroduced? In the explanatory document it is quite clear. Otherwise, how does one hold them to the consideration and grace periods? Or is that at the discretion of the judge?
    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday Express failed to investigate my complaint


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi admin, couldn't find a Payday Express forum, could you please move this conversation to correct place for me.

 

OK I have made a complaint to payday express re a loan provided even though my credit rating at the time was shot to bits with lots of defaults and other pd loans. They have come back to me and said they have'nt been able to look into my complaint due to a heavy workload.

 

So now I want to take my complaint to FOS but need help on how to word my complaint now that PDE have failed to respond within the weeks they were given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to correct forum.

 

So, basically they are saying they won't even investigate the complaint due to the workload? You couldn't make it up could you.

 

I think a basic letter (or email) to the FOS should state just what you have put above. I would think PDE are hoping you won't continue with this.

 

After the first 25 complaints (which are free) the FOS will then charge PDE for each complaint which will cost them far more than they would have to pay out in the first place.

 

Strange!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

am still waiting for their official response, but it boils down to the fact due to a heavy workload etc etc.....but that they still might come back with a response at some point in the future, and that I am free to contact FOS if I am not happy.....my complaint as above was for 2 loans back in 2013 - one in june and the 2nd in july, the 2nd one i defaulted on and although I cant remember how much the original loan was for, with default charges late fees etc the debt now stands at just over £800....my complaint was to get back all loan charges and write the unpaid debt off.....does the fact that they have failed to respond with a final offer make my case stronger to get the debt written off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they have said they 'might' come back with a response, I feel that to complain to the FOS may be fruitless unless it already is over the 8 week response time.

 

Just because they have a heavy workload is not your fault so they should investigate.

 

The FOS has made many decisions in the consumers favour however, it isn't a given.

 

Detail what you have done previously to resolve this, include any letters (or emails) they have sent you. Don't make it too long and include bullet points to make it easier for the adjudicator to understand.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Escalate to the FOS then. That will cost them another £500 on top of any compensation to you.

 

Bear in mind the FOS are also VERY busy so it will take time unless PDE fold at the first contact.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok then, this would be my complaint to FOS and what I would like as a resolution;

 

My complaint is that Payday Express failed to carry out the appropriate credit reference checks on 2 loans taken out in 2013. Should they have carried out even a basic level credit check they would have clearly seen that I had taken out numerous payday loans in the recent past, had numerous defaults against me and at least two CCJ’s which had only recently been settled and therefore the loans would not or should not have been granted.

I have raised a complaint with Payday Express regarding both loans asking them to remove all references for these loans from my credit files, to refund all loan charges, interest charges and default charges and to write the unpaid debt off. I gave Payday Express 8 weeks to respond and they have advised that due to a heavy workload that they have been unable to look into my complaint within this time period, but that they may still come back to me with a final resolution, although no time frame has been given for this.

Secondly, after receiving an email from Payday Express dated 4th April 2014 stating that I owed £850ish to which I replied that “To whom it may concern, I have neither admitted this debt nor have I made any agreement to any form of payment. Please ensure your records show this”, that Payday Express failed to respond with any form of reply and that on the 17th April 2014 another email was rec’vd from Payday Express stating that they had still tried to take the amount of £850.50 from my account even though they had provided no to information to prove that I owed this debt. (Copies of these emails are included).

I also think that it would have been clear to Payday Express that any loan would have been a risk as I also failed to pay back on time previous loans taken with them. (A copy of an email sent to Payday Express on the 01/03/2013 relating to a previous loan is included).

 

What I would like to be done;

I wish to ask that all references to loans taken out with Payday Express to be removed from my credit files.

Any and all interest charges, loan charges and default charges on loans taken out with Payday Express - not limited to the 2 loans mentioned in this complaint but associated with any loans tkaen with Payday Express to be refunded to me.

The loan that is currently outstanding to be written off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I've had the same response. When I asked PDE what the issue is I just got a standard reply "you are free to contact the FOS etc"

 

Do you have a thread on this?

 

My suspicion is that they are fobbing people off as they know a lot of complainants won't go as far as the FOS.

 

Do you have any idea of how much you think they may owe you? If not, you may need to get the statements to get a better picture.

 

It would be a lot quicker to take court action BUT never threaten them with action unless you are prepared to follow through.

 

If you have good enough figures to make a claim, a Letter Before Action is the first step giving them 14 days to respond. On day 15, claim!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

update - final response rec'vd due to the intervention of FOS - PDE have accepted no liability, said everything was done, credit checks etc etc - unless its a typo error on their part thay state in their final response that my "your net monthly salary as £12,152.00" ...I wish it was....I took 2 loans with them at a time when I was reliant on PDL's - the first loan was for £200 paid back on time - the 2nd loan was for £500 taken out the day I repaid the 1st loan. Anyways usual story could afford to repay it and now the debt stands at £850 - they have offered as a gesture of good will to waiver the £250 of charges - but not stated what is to appen to the remainder nor have they confirmed that they will remove the details of these loans from my credit files

Link to post
Share on other sites

they also state in their final response/offer - Our Settlement offer is made without any admission of liability and will remain open for fourteen days from the date of this letter. Our offer is strictly confidential and conditional upon you agreeing not to disclose to any third party details of the offer, the fact that an agreement has been reached and the terms of our agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you have just breached the terms of the agreement :lol: but I don't think it matters because it is only binding if you agree to it. I suspect they don't want the Ombudsman doing anything more.

 

Personally, I would reject it and let the Ombudsman make a decision. Remember, it is an adjudicator that makes the initial decision and if you disagree, they will escalate it to the Ombudsman. If the Ombudsman doesn't agree with you, you can still reject the offer and take matters into your own hands (legal action)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would point out to them that if you were earning that much a month, then you wouldn't have had to borrow from them in the first place ? Also, if they can make such a mistake in a letter to a customer then what other mistakes have they made ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep - i have decided to thank them for their response and emailed them asking for confirmation f a few things, like if i did state my monthly take home was that much then it would have shown on my credit files, and why on earth would i want a payday loan if i earnerd that much - and given them 3 days as theyve already had 10 weeks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think i read somewhere that FOS will charge PDE £500 if FOS deal with my complaint - if this is correct???? would it be worth reminding PDE of this as I would still owe them £500 and am happy to make an arrangement to pay it off providing they remove it from my credit files

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my own recollections (and as posted above #2) each firm pay a fixed amount each year and for that they get 25ish cases free of further charge. After that, for each complaint accepted by the FOS, they will charge the company approx £500 for the privilege of investigating them. Pay day loans are still high with the FOS so I would imagine that PDE has already exceeded its free ones.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Any news?

247 Moneybox - balance written off, default removed

Cash Genie - bogus default removed

Peachy - interest refunded, default removed

1 Month Loan - interest refunded, data removed

Peachy - balance written off, default removed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any news?

 

Hi, they found in my favour for the 2nd loan as this was over twice the amount of the first loan. I still have to pay the loan amount back but all interest, defaults etc are to be removed and when it is repaid removed from my credit files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...