Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells claimform - old Vanquis card 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1968 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

A few years ago me and my wife got an application form through the post for a Vanquis credit card.

She applied by post and I applied online.

We were both accepted.

 

They used to mess us about saying we had made late payments or gone over our limits despite them taking a direct debit successfully they chose not to take enough money.

 

they ended up spiralling out of control with fees and as I had just started a new business cash was tight and we couldn't pay.

I sent both of them this letter-

 

CCA request.

 

then sent FORMAL COMPLAINT/ ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE letter

 

Again they completely ignored it!

 

Stupidly I didn't follow this up as I was snowed under with a new business and a subsequent house move.

 

I have just checked my credit report and its on there as Lowell Portfolio I Ltd.

Default balance is roughly £2800 and IIRC the credit limit was around £2000, that's £800 in fees!

Default date is September 2014 and to my old address.

Last update was March 2015.

 

Its the only bad thing on my credit report.

The business is starting to do well and we will want to get a mortgage in the next 2-3 years.

I'm not sure how to proceed.

I cannot afford to pay this off in a lump sum, although I expect I'll be able to afford to settle next year.

 

However, I want to dispute the entire thing especially as they went ahead and defaulted it whilst I was disputing it.

I could afford some monthly payments but I'm trying to think long term about my credit file and ideally want to get the default removed.

 

Some pointers in the right direction would be appreciated. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Unfortunately once its on there it stays there for six years, paid or not.

 

If lowlifes haven't contacted you about it, then personally I'd let sleeping dogs lie.

 

Paying it off, either through monthly instalments or in one go, won't have any bearing on your credit worthiness, and unless they are reporting inaccurate data then there is no way of having it removed.

 

They have fell at the first hurdle, they have failed to provide you with the CCA, albeit they will be able to enforce the agreement in court should they wish, as it was taken out on line, so they can magic up a recon to show a judge.

 

The only thing you can do is to reclaim all of their fees and charges including interest if you wish? to bring the amount down and then pay it off, but there is no real incentive to do that really...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But when we apply for a mortgage wouldn't having it settled look better?

 

No not in the slightest, and TBH you would need a good few years clear credit history for a mortgage, or at the very least one with decent ish interest rates.

 

If the dates are correct on the CRF, and the data is accurate then it won't be moved until its 6 year anniversary where it will drop off automatically never to return, paid or not.

 

The failure to supply the CCA only means that they can't take enforcement action, ie, court.

BUT, as this was taken out on line, then they will be able to provide a recon to the DJ should they try and go down the legal route.

 

Most if not all, agreements taken out post 2007 are deemed compliant as they learnt the error of their ways with successes like CAG.

 

Have Lowlifes been corresponding with you at all about this?

  • Confused 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Failure of the CCA request is not enough to stop the Default and termination process

 

What will be a golden arrow is to demand the notice of default sums under section 86A CCA 1974 for each penaly charge made

 

Look at 86(d)(4) as well

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/86D

 

(4)The debtor or hirer shall have no liability to pay—

 

(a)any sum of interest to the extent calculated by reference to the period of non-compliance or to any part of it; or

 

(b)any default sum which (apart from this paragraph)—

 

(i)would have become payable during the period of non-compliance; or

 

(ii)would have become payable after the end of that period in connection with a breach of the agreement which occurs during that period (whether or not the breach continues after the end of that period).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The greater problem now when making a mortgage application is the very intrusive " questionnaire " that has to be completed.

Questions are asked not just about current credit accounts but historic ones and any problems with the management of accounts, late or missed payments, will be questioned some of there questionnaires I think look at 5-6 years of credit history. Apart from that a defaulted account paid off is not reported as " settled " just satisfied or partially satisfied by a full and final settlement payment of less than the full amount outstanding.

Any visible record of a default or payment problems even if it's something very simple like a mobile phone account Most of which are not credit agreements will see an application denied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Failure of the CCA request is not enough to stop the Default and termination process

 

What will be a golden arrow is to demand the notice of default sums under section 86A CCA 1974 for each penaly charge made

 

Look at 86(d)(4) as well

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/86D

 

(4)The debtor or hirer shall have no liability to pay—

 

(a)any sum of interest to the extent calculated by reference to the period of non-compliance or to any part of it; or

 

(b)any default sum which (apart from this paragraph)—

 

(i)would have become payable during the period of non-compliance; or

 

(ii)would have become payable after the end of that period in connection with a breach of the agreement which occurs during that period (whether or not the breach continues after the end of that period).

 

 

 

That looks very interesting, thank you. I made the original CCA on 6th May to Vanquis while the account was still open and the Default date according to the crf is Septmber 30 so that was plenty of time for more fees. However the default is registered as Lowel (Vanquis is not mentioned anywhere on the crf). Obviously the default would have come from Vanquis and it has since been sold to Lowell?

 

 

I am 1 year into my 6 year wait so I don't want to compromise statue barred if this isn't going to work. Can I make the demand without admitting liability?

 

 

I'm sure I've received the odd letter from Lowel but I don't have them and it was probably whilst I still had my post redirected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CRF will show the name of the outfit doing the chasing, which is why lowlifes name appears next to the default marker, so as long as the date doesn't change then it is only the name of the gophers chasing that will alter.

 

Requesting the CCA, does NOT affect the SB clock, the only thing that affects that is payment or a written acknowledgement.

 

But you have already made a CCA request, and they have failed to respond.

 

However this is post 07 and taken out online, so will almost certainly be enforceable if they choose to go down that road.

 

IMO the best way to attack this would be to get a complete history of the account, see how much fees/charges (including interest on those fees/charges) has been added and request they be refunded, whereby you will set up a payment plan that is realistic and comfortable for YOU, not them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi everyone. Over a year later I have just recieved a Letter of Claim (LBA?) from Lowell Solicitors. They say they will be commencing with the CCBC without further notice.

 

They want the original £2860, plus £230 fees, £185 court fee and £80 solicitors, totalling £3355.

IIRC the original debt was £2000 max.

 

They have sent the odd letter over the year offer a 40% discount but I haven't made any contact with anyone since my complaint to the OC which was ignored.

 

What would be the best way to proceed?

Should I request a history to see what all these charges are?

Or should I wait for court proceedings and ask for it then?

Or something else?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, welcome back...

 

What exactly does that letter say?

Is it a letter of claim, OR a letter before action?

 

Did you ever SAR Vanquis to determine what fees and charges they have added that you can reclaim?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To clarify, here is the letter-

 

Dear *******

 

Letter of Claim

 

We have not heard from you regarding your Vanquis account and are instructed by our client, Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, to commence Legal Action and issue a Claim against you in the County Court Bulk Centre in respect of this debt.

 

You must contact us or make arrangements to pay within the next 14 days or a Claim will be issued without further notice to you.

 

In then lists the fees and CCJ consequences etc

 

Letter says I have til the 28/12/16.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Just to check thats to Vanquis and not Lowel?

 

Just read the template yes it goes to OC.

 

Also it seems I have to give 40 days for them to reply, what happens if Lowel stick to their timeframe of 14 days to start proceedings? Also Vanquis ignored my CCA and dispute, I'm guessing they'll ignore this too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan the letter up to PDF letter of claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send a new CCA request to lowlife.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

new cca to lowlife

do not refer to anything else or past

 

 

sar to a dca is pointless

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...