Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help Needed with RBOS Royalties A/C


Yvonne90
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I've never posted on here before but I've been watching the threads with interest. I'll fill you in on the background before I start asking questions. The a/c was in my name for a few years from June 01 to Jan 04 then I added my fiance on as a joint name on the a/c. To cut a long story short he went to work for a so called friend who for 18 months never paid him on time etc. so charges just snowballed on our joint a/c. At the time I added him on to my a/c his one with RBOS was a mess and he also has a loan with him but these 2 a/c's are in his name only - my name was never anywhere near them. He now has a new job (thankfully!!) and a payment arrangement with RBOS to clear his old current and loan a/c.

 

I sent my preliminary letter 19/10/06 requesting £3483 in charges they've taken. I've had no response to this and am about to sent my LBA tomorrow.

 

Couple of questions:

1/ As the a/c I'm claiming for is now in joint names can they penalise this a/c for what went on with his old a/c's? Some of the charges I'm claiming for are obviously pre-joint but others are since it became a joint a/c.

 

2/ His old a/c that's in his name only was a mess with bank charges snowballed on prior to him becoming named on my a/c. Are we still entitled to start a separate claim to get these charges back as well?

 

3/ Are they likely to start chasing repayment of the loan because of the claim even though we have a payment arrangement with them?

 

I'd be really grateful for any help anyone can give me with this situation - it's a bit messy to say the least! If anyone has any insight as to how these things works, it would be most appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Yvonne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yvonne

 

What follows here are entirely my thoughts, and have no "real" grounding!

 

1) No, I believe each account has to be handled separately and claimed separately.

 

2) Yes, Claim every charge back on every account. Closed accounts, joint accounts, single accounts etc. The only case where this may not be applicable is if he has filed for bankrupcy.

 

3) I think that would be unlikely, but if he is claiming charges back on the loan account that are more than the balance outstanding they may use that to close the loan.

 

Hope that helps somewhat, although I would get a few answers to be sure!!

 

iPeach

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that icklepeach. It's a complete nightmare. We've both always been fairly good with money until we had the nightmare where he was working for his ex-friend. Considering all the negative press about people getting into debt etc. they're not willing to help at all the minute you start suffering and having a few problems! If they'd been more helpful in the first place we wouldn't have had half the mess we ended up in - it's taken us 18 months to get back on our feet again. Still, I suppose historically, that's how these places have always made their money!

 

Thanks again,

Yvonne

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...