Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

AA Loan defaulted 10/2008 still on my CRA file


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can I trouble you for some advice?

 

I have lurked here for quite a while but now want to clear something up.

 

Over the past 18months 1st Credit have been hassling me over an old AA Finance Loan which was sold to 1st Credit in 2011.

 

I received letters from 1st since 2013 and

I wrote to them with usual £1 PO asking for true copy of account documents including signed copy of agreement, statement of acccount and T&Cs.

I have received nothing from them.

 

 

I have not acknowledged the debt and I have a letter from them where they state "I understand that you consider that you have no knowledge ofthe account"

 

The outstanding balance was £16K and for one reason and another I couldn't pay it.

I managed to make payments until 2008 and then through a debt management company i made more payments to April 2009.

 

 

I believe it is now statute Barred but I am not saying anything for another month. they have not sent me any statements of account

 

However. I have recently checked on Equifax and on my account is an entry by 1st credit stating that there is an active loan account for 16K.

 

Advice.

should i ask for a statement of account and ask why they have an entry such as this when i have no loan agreement with them that they can prove or can be collected?

 

It doesnt show as defaulted or as a red entry it just shows as outstanding.

 

I have attached what is on file at equinox. Experian has nothing and Noddle has nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the default has gone. But they seem to have entered it as a loan ??? and the ammount outstanding is still the same. It is not shown as default any longer but it is still there. Can I make them take it down via ICO ?

 

YES.

 

You need to make offical complaint to the data controller at First Crud as well!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you ever sent a Default Notice ?

 

If you did not, then you will have to wait for 6 years, plus at least 2 months to give you a fighting chance on claiming statute barred.

 

Was this a secured or unsecured loan and was there any Payment Protection Insurance on the account.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have proof of the defaulted date

write to the CRA provider

simply asking why it is still showing

 

quote the ICO Guidance:

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

 

 

inc a copy of default proof

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have proof of the defaulted date

write to the CRA provider

simply asking why it is still showing

 

quote the ICO Guidance:

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

 

 

inc a copy of default proof

 

As I said further up this thread. The default has been removed but has been replaced with an entry that says I have a loan with them for the full amount. And that no payments are being made to it. It is effectively the same as a BAD entry. Sort of "default" but not saying that. As they cannot produce the original agreement or a signed copy of it AND the debt is statute barred can I ask - force them to remove the "Loan" entry ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

but the orig loan/entry did have a defaulted date that has exceeded 6yrs from its birth

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but the orig loan/entry did have a defaulted date that has exceeded 6yrs from its birth

 

 

dx

 

The 6 years was up on 31/10/2014 and it was removed and no longer appears.

 

It's whether I can do anything about this so called "Loan"

 

Bloke

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are obviously not understanding post 10

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...