Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M+S Default Removal


Harry May
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I had a dispute with an M&S agreement which was a very bad copy of an application form back in 2008 sending all the relevant letters etc... This is now seven years ago. M&S sent me a default notice at the time and then sold the alleged debt on.

 

below is a time line of what happened and a few questions hope someone can help.

 

March 2008

 

Disputed debt from M&S sent letter cca request (poorly eligible application form) Approx £4000

 

August 2008

 

M&S transferred alleged debt to debt collectors (Collect Direct)

Collect Direct wrote threatening to take me to court - Sent them a letter explaining that the debt was in dispute and that was the last we heard from them.

I also sent a letter back to M&S as they sent the same eligible application form and I stated that the account was in dispute under section 78(6) states that while the account is in dispute it cannot be enforced.

Note This was the last correspondence we had with anyone todate

 

Dec 2009 - Present

 

Started getting numerous letters from 1st Credit (Finance) Limited threatening to take me to court to offering substantial discounts off the alleged debt received over the next few years at least once a week. Along with phone calls and texts.

Also Letters from Lowell Finance & Connaught Collections

 

Below are a few of the letters received:

 

May 2014

 

Received letter from M&S stating that they have sold the debt to 1st Credit ( Finance) 4 Limited on the 25/01/2013

Received letter from 1st credit "County Court Proceedings Being Considered"

 

July 2014

 

Received letter from M&S stating that they have sold the debt to 1st Credit ( Finance) 4 Limited on the 25/01/2013

 

October 2014

 

Received letter from Solicitors Moon Beever acting for 1st Credit

Day later letter from Connaught Collections

 

August 2014

 

Letter from Lowell Financial stating that they have written to us on numerous occasions and offering a discount.

 

March 2015

 

Received letter from M&S stating that they have sold the debt to 1st Credit ( Finance) 4 Limited on the 25/01/2013 ( Cannot understand why they have contacted me now when the alleged debt is now over six years from 2008 Also they had already sold alleged debt off to Collect Direct in August 2008 which is also over six years ago and also to Lowell Financial).

 

Also received letter from 1st Credit (Finance) Limited stating that they have assigned a debt from 1st Credit (Finance) 4 Limited.

When checking credit reference agency I noticed a default from 1st Credit Limited suddenly appear which was not there last month but on further investigation found that they had lodged a default in Dec 2009 ( did not receive any Default Notice) and when I recently updated my credit file with old addresses it appeared so must of been linked to an old address.

 

Questions

 

1) If a debt is over six years old and gone off my record can a debt collector still keep a default on your credit file even if the account is in dispute and now statute barred?

 

2) Also M&S have written to me way over the six years to tell me that they have sold the debt in 2013 to 1st Credit (Finance) 4 Limited.

 

Are they in breach as the account was in dispute and the alleged debt is now statute barred?

 

3) Is there a limit to the number of creditors that can chase you for a debt?

 

I have had 1st Credit & Lowell Financial Chasing me at the same time.

 

4) Can a creditor put a Default on your credit file if the account is in dispute?

 

5) M&S issued a Default Notice in 2008 & 1st Credit added a default on my credit file in Dec 2009 is this allowed?

 

At no time have I received any Default Notice from 1st Credit and only recently since checking my credit rating have noticed this default.

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

Harry May

Edited by Harry May
Link to post
Share on other sites

Questions

 

1) If a debt is over six years old and gone off my record

can a debt collector still keep a default on your credit file

even if the account is in dispute and now statute barred?

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

 

2) Also M&S have written to me way over the six years to tell me that they have sold the debt in 2013 to 1st Credit (Finance) 4 Limited.

- doesn't matter

 

Are they in breach as the account was in dispute and the alleged debt is now statute barred?

no

 

3) Is there a limit to the number of creditors that can chase you for a debt?

ideally only one should be 'asking' for payment, but many are the same 'group' anyway

an sb'd debt in E&W can still be chased

as it still 'exists'

 

I have had 1st Credit & Lowell Financial Chasing me at the same time.

 

4) Can a creditor put a Default on your credit file if the account is in dispute? yes

5) M&S issued a Default Notice in 2008 & 1st Credit added a default on my credit file in Dec 2009 is this allowed?

no as above

 

At no time have I received any Default Notice from 1st Credit and only recently since checking my credit rating have noticed this default.

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

Harry May

 

 

.............

 

edit, I'm a bit confused, above you say it doesn't show on cra, but later you say it does?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks DX for your quick response.

 

Regarding the cra I only recently joined one and did not enter my past addresses and my credit file was excellent!

 

Then last week I updated my file with my old addresses and that is when I noticed the default suddenly appear.

 

I then found out that 1st Credit had put this on in Dec 2009.

 

 

So are you saying that after six years of the debt being gone with no payments and no correspondence that all the defaults should be gone as well even if they put them on later?

 

M&S account stopped paying Dec 2007 six years would be Dec 2013

 

No correspondence since Aug 2008

 

If I understand you correctly any defaults should of gone when the account went (after six years) if so how do I go about getting this default taken off?

 

Best regards

 

Harry May

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are lumping defaults with statute barring

there is no direct link.

 

 

if the debt in its summary top line has a defaulted date

 

 

that debt should be totally removed from the cra file on the defaults 6th birthday.

never to return, regardless to any later defaults etc etc

 

 

that's does not mean the debt might not still be owed mind.

 

 

statute barring is 6yrs from last use or written & signed acknowledgement

if/if not a debt shows on your CRA file is nowt to do with any SB criteria.

 

 

if you have proof that the debt was listed as defaulted

more than 6yrs ago and still shows

you need to provide that proof to the CRA people and demand the debt is removed under the ICO guidelines.

 

 

placing another default on the file should not hold the debt on the file

for another 6yrs

unless you rectified the old default within 14 days.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no not needed.

 

 

if you have documented proof

like and old cra file printout

or a copy of the M&S DN or record of it in say and sar

 

 

all you need to do is simply send that with a cover note

asking why the file is still showing outside of this defaults 6th birthday.

 

 

don't forget mind

there are three cra providers

 

 

might be an idea to tackle one

 

 

then fwd that around the others when successful.

 

 

most of them have live chat

noddle has a free query service.

simply ask the question there?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

they cant change the OC's original defaulted date from the CRA file

but 6mts is not really an issue

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

 

Thanks again for your quick response

 

 

do you think if I wrote to the cra after July and show them the original default notice

they will take first credits default off or is it best just to wait until December!

 

Regards

 

Harry May

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 6 answered already

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...