Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

co-op Credit card debt, multiple DCA's confusion.


matt0677
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I defaulted on a Co-op credit card debt a few years ago. It was eventually passed to Fredrickson International, with whom I have an agreement, which I have never missed a payment on. The debt has fallen from over £6k to just under £5k, so my intentions are clear. I believe, but cannot be sure, that at one point the Co-op sent me a letter saying that they're done with me, no more contact etc.

 

I recently received a letter from "Link Financial", with an enclosed letter from the Co-op, saying that the Co-op has sold my debt to Link, both agreeing that I should now be paying Link. It mentioned that if I was already paying a DCA, then they'd sort it out among themselves. I am fairly sure my contract with Co-op was terminated when I started dealing with Fredrickson.

 

I heard nothing more for a couple of months, except Fred said I had missed a payment on Jan 1st, but I think that was a glitch in timing. In late Feb I got another letter from Link which told me to stop ignoring my debts and get in touch with them to arrange a payment plan.

 

I emailed them a week ago detailing my confusion, and have not received a response. Today I did receive another letter from Link demanding that I sign and return a standing order form (no thanks, I can set that up myself thank you!) - the terms were all the same as my deal with Fredrickson except for the payment date, which states 30th of each month rather than 1st. Obviously this will be a major issue every other month, when I'm paid on 31st!

 

In all this time I've had no contact from Fredrickson, who have been happily accepting my payments and updating my balance accordingly - each letter from Link has the account balance printed on it, and it has reduced according to my payments.

 

So should I alter my standing order to pay Link instead of Fred? Won't Fred still be wanting the money? Why has Fred remained silent on the matter? I've already received a "non-payment" threat from Fred, SINCE the transfer Link claims happened, even though the payment was made on time as it is every month.

 

Thanks for any advice - I've been a bit succinct because tbh, I don't know which details are relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this on yoiur credit file?

 

if plink have it

 

then something is prob wrong

 

send plink a cca request

 

and freddies one too

 

something smellshere

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the small print at the bottom of the letter from Frederickson International - does it mention any connection to Link Outsourcing? I am pretty certain that they are.

Edited by citizenB

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this were me, I would be sending a letter asking why there are 2 DCAs making attempts to collect and could they please confirm in writing who you need to make payment to.

 

Advise them that you are aware of the Debt Collection Guidelines which does not permit 2 agencies to pursue one debt.

 

Then send one letter to Link with a copy to Frederickson - use head office/registered office addresses for both letters and obtain proof of posting which is free, from the post office.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I got a bit caught up in some personal issues since posting this. Thanks for the replies.

 

To the people suggesting CCA's and SRA's, I do acknowledge this debt and have been paying it off slowly but surely.

The tone used by Link, though, is leaving me cold.

If I am forced to deal with them I'll probably be less co-operative (hah!)

 

Just to clarify,

I have received NO communication whatsoever from Fredrickson on this matter.

They have continued to accept my payments (paid by a standing order set up by myself)

and my account balance has been updated every month

- the letters from Link both show my balance so somewhere, centrally, the three companies are sharing this.

 

No fees have been added since the Co-op washed their hands of the matter, which is as it should be, I believe.

 

 

I have kept all correspondence, which includes one single statement from Fredrickson, I think.

They demand that you set up an account on their website which I did not do

- I emailed my payment offer to their "enquiries" email and set up a standing order manually

- they'd rather it was a DD!! No chance!

 

It is on my credit file.

And yes, something smells.

My "account" has been sold on,

but not by the party who I'm currently dealing with..

. Surely once I made an agreement with Fred, Co-op are no longer involved.

 

I'll scan the letters and put them up, but I think citizenB's advice sounds like the right course of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to send plink a CCA request

and an sar to the co-op

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to send plink a CCA request

and an sar to the co-op

 

 

No I don't. I need clarification on who exactly is supposed to be dealing with the debt which I am quite happy to pay, and I will then pay them. I'm not trying to evade a legitimate debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I don't. I need clarification on who exactly is supposed to be dealing with the debt which I am quite happy to pay, and I will then pay them. I'm not trying to evade a legitimate debt.

 

 

if plink have it . it is not a legitimate debt!

 

 

tell me

 

 

why would a billion £ company like co-op sell a debt on

why not take you to court....??

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, fair enough rocky start and all that. I'll behave ;-) Thanks for your help so far.

 

What is plink and is it something to do with Link? You've mentioned it more than once as though I should know about it. Why does their involvement automatically make it a cause to fight for??

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes its our pet name for LInk

 

 

you've only got to read a few threads to see what link are like.

 

 

this is where your money goes...

 

 

http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/news/millionaire-debt-collector-digs-deep-south-kensington

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...