Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Was RBS rude to do this?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey everybody,

 

New poster here, I have been a lurker on here for a while now :-)

 

I am just wondering what other opinions are on this.

 

 

I contacted my bank RBS via their online complaints form 1 week ago.

I did not receive any kind of email verification from them to say that they had received my message,

the terms of their complaints procedure says that they will be in contact within 5 working days.

 

I have a disability and am unable to use the telephone because of it,

I explained this in the message,

I asked in webchat on Friday if they had received my message

but the person I chatted with said they had not received any thing,

but, she said that may be because it hadn't been 'logged' yet.

 

this evening I went back in again to ask if they had logged my complaint yet

and the person I chatted with said that he would get the complaints team to give me a ring,

so of course I explained to him again that this wouldn't be an option.

 

The conversation went a little something like this -

 

RBS man: I will get the complaints team to ring you shortly.

Me: I won't be able to speak to them via the telephone unfortunately due to my disability

RBS man: Sorry to hear that dear

Me: I will come back tomorrow and use the webchat

RBS man: Come back tomorrow and we will transfer the chat, will that do.

 

Now, I know this is probably horribily trivial

,but it's not the most professional thing in the world to call a customer 'dear',

I am personally not a senstive person at all but it did come across as condescending and perhaps rude?

 

I am just looking to see what peoples personal opinions are on this really?

Should I mention it to the complaints team?

I don't want to get this individual into any kind of trouble if he genuinly did not mean to be rude,

but other people may take this the wrong way?

 

He only seemed to become condescending after finding out I have a disability,

and that does get rather boring and irritating (As does typing the bloody word 'disability' :!:)

 

If he was being deliberately rude then I would mention it,

but I am not sure and really don't want to be overly sensitive.

 

Anyway, thank you all for reading my ramblings.

Edited by JaneJaneLane
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, I know this is probably horribily trivial,but it's not the most professional thing in the world to call a customer 'dear', I am personally not a senstive person at all but it did come across as condescending and perhaps rude?

 

It annoys me when someone I do not know addresses me as "mate", or even worse, "chap". My usual response is "don't be so damned impertinent. That will be sir to you.". If the message doesn't sink in, a quick word with his/her manager suggesting that the staff are given training in etiquette sometimes works.

 

But if a bank clerk ever addresses me as "dear", be assured, I would be filing a complaint at the highest level.:mad2:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its prob a slip of the tongue and they didn't mean any offence

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably did know how to respond ..

 

 

if the conversation had been on the phone

and you are female

and you indicated an issue

 

 

then its 'reasonable' for people to say dear vocally, 'sorry to hear that dear'...it shows empathy

 

 

its unusual to see it in type yes

but it was the 'webchat' which could be viewed as an alternate to phone.

 

 

so I'd say its reasonable to use in that context via that method of comms

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input, I won't worry about mentioning it :-)

 

Things got a bit odd today with RBS though, I was chatting with the complains team via the webchat option and the person I was speaking to somehow got me confused with my mother (Probably because of the same address?) and gave me my mums transaction details over the chat log, whoops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...