Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

5Day learner driver training False Advertisment


hammer0908
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Friend has been on a 5 day driver training course.

 

she was not to the required standard DSA level 5 so was not put forward for the test on day 5. This she understands.

 

However the reason I query this for you wise comments are the following:

 

The website does not explain at what level you need to be, or that if they cannot get you to DSA level 5 then you will not be put in for the test or return for the test. see 5day website

On the website it states

  1. If you are unsuccessful on your Theory Test or Practical Test
  2. Get FREE, unlimited theory and practical correction lessons until you pass.
     
  3. The complete course is only £914.00. This not only includes all the driving tuition but also the fee for your theory test and practical test


 

This is not true. Could I complain to trading standards or anyone about this?

 

in T & C's which you get after you have paid, it does state that in the case of non achievement further lessons can be agreed between the pupil and the trainer.

 

My query here is, it sate that it includes the hire of the car for the test and if you do not Pass there is a MENTORING RETEST PROGRAMME should the candidate fail on the first test or any successive retest the driver. blah Blah Blah. FREE remedial help will be offered from the training centre until you pass.

 

the Question.

Additional lesson required to bring her to the standard required is the reasonable for these to be charged

Should they only be provided by the centre to validate the MENTORING RETEST PROGRAM

 

You comment would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.5day.co.uk/

 

5day.co.uk... is this the one hammer ?

 

 

 

Practical and theory tuition and full onsite support at our dedicated training centre. Located at centres around the UK, we provide you with a perfect learning environment.

 

If you are unsuccessful on your Theory Test or Practical Test

Get FREE, unlimited theory and practical correction lessons until you pass.

 

The complete course is only £914.00. This not only includes all the driving tuition but also the fee for your theory test and practical test.

 

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is, it says absolutely nothing on the site. There has to be terms and conditions issued before the course starts otherwise they cannot hold you to a 'no return deposit'.

 

Interesting, it did give you the terms with the invoice which you then have 48 hours to read or it cannot be canceled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Conniff

 

Are they able to advertise without T&C or a smal not explaining the small pint, as you have with financial transactions etc.

 

However, in the T&C as I mentioned it does not indicate the level that is expected. The instructor said that to pass in 5 days 99% have had some lessons (to DSA level 2).

 

In addition, the contract was accepted with the offer that retest will be free. They now say that this is not the case as she was not put in for the test.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they can advertise without terms and conditions as long as the terms and conditions give you all your consumer rights and not try to suppress any of them.

 

 

I think there wording and methods are very cleverly worked out. If you take a test and fail they continue with lessons until you do pass which, of course, costs them money, so by not putting you through for a test they don't have to continue with the lessons.

 

 

The site gives a breakdown of the fees which shows the test fee separately, was that fee returned to you ?

 

 

I would like to see these terms and conditions hammer if you could scan them and put them up here. They will need to be in .pdf format or will be too small to read.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]55995[/ATTACH]

 

Thank you for this.

 

I understand although disappointed advertising can be allowed to be so unclear. Still letter to someone may help?

 

I have also as suggested attached their t&c's for your thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"For the avoidance of doubt the standard required is level 5 as published on the Driving Standards Agency website and the Agency’s Drivers Record."

 

 

So it would seem they have said what the required standard to reach must be. The continue with lessons is only if you fail the test not if you don't take it.

They offer extra lessons which you have to pay for should you not reach the standard.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

It seams to achieve the level 5 in the time provided on the road (the course included the theory test so not all the time is on the road). That it was expected that the candidates would already have some experience at the controls of a car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"In the case of non achievement further training options include lessons from a DSA approved instructor or private practice until such time that the required standard is achieved. 5DAY are not responsible for any further lessons agreed between the pupil and a 5DAY instructor, payment for such lessons are entirely the responsibility of the pupil and the instruct"

"There is no guarantee implied written or otherwise that a pupil will get to the required standard to be able to pass a driving test as achieving this standard is entirely down to the pupils ability."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff,

 

Than you for your help.

 

I understand you have pasted the relevant parts of the T&C but that does not answer my quires.

 

That in your own opinion that once that ability (LEVEL 5 ) is reached that in is reasonable to then go back to them and request the instructor to asses them (chargeable) they then if you fail carry training and retest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

so because my wife have got not time having a autistic child limits her time we went for the 5 day school what they say in the website is misleading not unlimited lessons but they make you pay the teachers extra lessons and the teachers so busy we couldent get lessons theis website is a [removed] better throw your money before using them that is my best advice

 

none of their promeses in the website are true they get you to pay thay money then that is it bye bye

Edited by honeybee13
Potentially libellous words edited.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...