Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio claimform - old SLC loans - stayed - now N244 **WON SJ refused**


patterns
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am ready to send off the PAP form and reply.

No CCA to be requested as agreed but wasnt sure about the following points to add.

I have posted my response draft below.

 

I will tick box D, and im pretty sure i dont need to send my income and financial statement forms or should i?

i will be sending pages 10, 11, 12 and 13 signed with the below letter:

 

_______________

 

I enclose the form requested to be returned.

I bring your attention to that this debt is in dispute as I am not in arrears.

My account should be deferred.

I have been in correspondence with your client, all of which proof is noted.

The deferment forms were sent in the correct timescales and correct under the decision of the financial ombudsman service.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

___________

 

 

Should i tick box I and add:

 

I will also require:

 

A copy of the Default Notice (mortgage style loan so N/A?)

A copy of the Notice of Assignment (N/A as Not assigned to anyone new?)

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, by the original creditor or Arrow the debt purchaser or any predecessor.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

Not sure those further requests are necessary but wasn't sure.

Anything else i should add? in this thread

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?490204-SLC-Erudio-1993-loan-now-Dryden-PAP-letter/page2

 

They have sent a copy of all their deferment forms (unsigned) ticking box H, along with a SAR request to erudio (ticking box I), should i do the same?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am ready to send off the PAP form and reply.

No CCA to be requested as agreed but wasnt sure about the following points to add. if you've not ever sent a CCA request yes send one staple it to our version of the pap reply form]

I have posted my response draft below.

 

I will tick box D, put as blue below i dispute the debt because..

 

 

and im pretty sure i dont need to send my income and financial statement forms or should i? no we have said don't in that thread.

 

i will be sending pages 10, 11, 12 and 13 signed with the below letter: no you DONT SIGN IT read the text post 4 here https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

 

_______________

 

I enclose the form requested to be returned.

I bring your attention to that this debt is in dispute as I am not in arrears.

My account should be deferred.

I have been in correspondence with your client, all of which proof is noted.

The deferment forms were sent in the correct timescales and correct under the decision of the financial ombudsman service.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

___________

 

 

Should i tick box I and add:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

read the advise here.

I will also require:

 

A copy of the Default Notice (mortgage style loan so N/A?)

A copy of the Notice of Assignment (N/A as Not assigned to anyone new?)

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, by the original creditor or Arrow the debt purchaser or any predecessor.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

Not sure those further requests are necessary but wasn't sure.

Anything else i should add? in this thread

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?490204-SLC-Erudio-1993-loan-now-Dryden-PAP-letter/page2

 

They have sent a copy of all their deferment forms (unsigned

 

 

ticking box H, along with a SAR request to erudio

 

 

(ticking box I), should i do the same?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks, i have read that a few times just unclear on a couple things

 

so i will NOT include deferment copies

 

I WILL Tick box D

 

Yes i did request my CCA from Erudio but what they sent me was microfiche copies with reconstitiuted T & C's , i did upload but i cant see where those pages have gone, however i have them. Also have SAR from SLC. So should i still request this again?

 

i WILL tick box I and request

I also require you to supply the following..

a copy of the Default Notice

A copy of the Notice of Assignment

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, be them by the original creditor or you xxxx the debt purchaser or any predecessor DCA.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

Do i include my statement on my covering letter - you highlighted in blue not sure what that meant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have deferred then they have them you don't need to copy again to them.

when did you last CCA?

 

you cant do anything 'wrong' so I wouldnt really sweat too much about what you need to put or include or say

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All, so update

 

2 separately posted letters received by Drydens:

 

1 - stating the client (erudio) confirms they never received any request for deferment since they took over the loan.

Under the terms i can no longer defer and the full amount is repayable.

if i dont pay in full by the 26th Nov i need to call and arrange a plan

 

Strange considering this all initially started because they sent me their deferment which i didnt want to sign and sent the original.

I have letters back and forth and complaints which they acknowledge and i have proof of these being sent, and of them even telling me about my deferment options and still attaching their forms.

 

2 - second letter is of them acknowledging my requests attached with PAP, returning my £1 PO, stating this is no longer required??

They state the account will go on a 30 day hold while they investigate.

Kind of conflicting since above they state i must pay in full within the next 9 days.

 

I have a lot of recorded proof and letters back and forth which clearly had my deferments in them but not their deferment hence them playing silly buggers.

 

i dont however have recorded proof of every year only 2 years, but letter responses from them 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 where they acknowledge my complaints not directly addressing my deferments but again all relating to the same issue, and even sent me deferment forms

 

Not sure if i should reply and state i have all of this and send proof?

i do feel if i ignore they will take this to court which i would rather not do, but if must be so be it, i have done as requested and i am still under the deferment threshold so i should have been entitled to this.

 

But of course i shall await to see what your thoughts are

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

ball is in their court

you do nothing

sit on your hands

 

post 10 and post 16 refer.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Quick update. i drafted a letter to erudio re-post 16, thank you again dx100uk

 

But also Drydens have sent me yet another PAP! Im presuming as its a PAP i must again respond? Either they are just automating this crap or they are ignoring the previous one and sending again

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep someone else has had a duplicate too just like you

same again.

I suspect drydens have realised there are numerous loans within the erudio ref number

and are sending out one for each

trouble is they are using the same number :lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the same as you did for the last PAP reply form

no-one said send payslips before did we?

hope you didn't

or was that part of the SLC deferement stuff you have to send when using their old form I forget?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx100Uk sorry for the late reply,

 

Sure thing im doing the pap form right now again.

 

Nope never sent payslips or anything. Only thing i have ever sent in the past to erudio is my original SLC deferment form, a CCA request and SAR request. And also re: post 16 a letter demanding that, which they sent a stupid non sensical reply to, which we ignored.

 

This time i am planning to send the same letter re; post 16 demanding they give me my entitlement to my deferment, but to clarify shall i send another SLC deferment? and im signing the deferment correct? i think we agreed signing was ok because i didnt dispute the debt only the right to deferment.

 

Hi europa16, haha so ridiculous isn't it, fully entitled to my deferment and very frustrating. I shall be watching your thread and wish you luck. Thank god for this forum and dx100uk's help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd just send the old SLC deferment forms for the loans on years whereby you didn't.

nothing more..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Update!

 

Received the same generic letter from drydens 'looking into it' as last time, they returned by £1 postal order RE CCA saying not applicable?

 

Erudio replied telling me that they investigated the matter and that my last deferment was 2009!

i dished out a letter from them stating my deferment ended in 2014!

interesting... seeing as thats when all this kicked off as the whole reason behind this is they wouldn't accept my original SLC deferment.

 

im tempted to send the proof of their letter stating the 2014 deferment ending, contradicting their letter stating 2009 was my last deferment althought wanted advice first

 

as always thank you for the support

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

if your last deferment was in their eyes 2009 the debt is statute barred.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

last deferment or written and signed letter by you.

 

see where it goes

 

most of these letters that resulted in various posts here and elsewhere have gone quiet.

 

me thinks an office junior was tasked with raising money for the firms mass xmas holiday in the Bahamas funded by mugd that will panic and pay up.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha sounds about right!

 

Great ill see what happens next but yes i have sensed it go quiet.. last letter from drydens is they were supposed to come back to me and havent so far.. twice

 

Thanks once again and ill report as soon as i hear anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a quick update:

erudio sent a letter notifying transfer to drydens? bit odd seeing as they have already contacted me with 2 sets of PAP (as above posts), potentially just an automated system letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys

 

UPdate: drydens sent me a letter stating they have taken the debt to County court claim. Received the county court claim in the post today. Looks like i may well be going to court! Never defended a CCC before, ive started compiling all my evidence and refreshing all the posts in here and others.

 

Any advice on what my ext step should be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues forum in view of the court claim.

 

Please read the following link and then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice on how to proceed.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/357877-you-have-received-a-claim-what-you-need-to-do-updated-jan-2019/

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Erudio - Sent me my slc CCA - now Court Claim

Thanks Andy, im going to read carefully and fully respond tomorrow. To clarify im just concerning myself with the first post only for now as this is the claim form NOT the N1 summons? i cant see N1 written anywhere and imagine thats the next stage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...