Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

blemain finance want to GIVE me a refund?


bobdylan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I

hope someone can shed some light on a letter I got from this company yesterday.

 

 

In March this year my ex wife passed away

we divorced in 2004 after sorting finances out and selling the house at the time.

 

 

Now I got a letter from blemain finance saying they have a refund for me it was addressed to me and my ex.

 

 

When I rang them they were unaware that my ex had passed away and asked if I could send them a death certificate

as proof and my bank details as they have a substantial refund to pay back.

 

Now if this was something my ex started to claim before she passed she did not tell anyone,

also I can not remember who my mortgage was with at the time and blemain will only tell me that it is linked to a mortgage

and a secured load as I did not have most of the answers to their security questions.

They did say if I was not happy giving my bank details they could send me a cheque.

 

So does anybody know if this is a legit or not as I have never heard of this company before

and a google search just comes up with negative stories of bad practises and ripping people off,

 

 

they don't sound like they would give refunds without being forced to do so

and I do not want to send them documents like a death certificate.

Any info would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is a turn up for the books!

 

BF giving people money is a first for me too

 

poss PPI?

 

if you wanted too

send them an sar request

 

include your old addresses and a copy of your current CTAX bill as ID.

 

then you'll get all the info and the reason they are trying to refund you.

 

it MIGHT be that there was a period whereby they sent no statements and they need to refund the associated interest/charges?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

it may be linked to the FSA fine the company received, The FSA said about 2,000 affected customers of Cheshire Mortgage Corporation could receive compensation.

follow this link http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/henry-moser-and-cheshire-mortgage-corporation-698694

P.S Chesire mortgage Corporation is part of Blemain Finance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

threads three years old devo

start a new thread

OF YOUR OWN please

you wont get seen here

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...